31St Report of the ABA Checklist Committee 2020

31St Report of the ABA Checklist Committee 2020

31st Report of the ABA Checklist Committee 2020 PETER PYLE, Staff Biologist for The Institute for Bird Populations chairman, aba checklist committee San Francisco, California • [email protected] MARY GUSTAFSON Mission, Texas • [email protected] TOM JOHNSON Cape May, New Jersey • [email protected] ANDREW W. KRATTER Gainesville, Florida • [email protected] AARON LANG Homer, Alaska • [email protected] MARK W. LOCKWOOD Lorenzo, Texas • [email protected] KRISTIE NELSON Eunice, California • [email protected] DAVID SIBLEY Deerfield, Massachusetts • [email protected] 8 NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS CHECKLIST COMMITTEE REPORT Common Wood-Pigeon, or more records in the ABA Area (Pranty et Pallas’s Gull, Pallas’s al. 2008). A tally of 8–0 for acceptance of a CHANGES Grasshopper-Warbler, record automatically results in the addition IN BRIEF: and Tricolored Munia of the species to the Checklist, whereas a tally of 0–8 results in automatic non-acceptance. added to the Checklist Intermediate vote tallies result in automatic Species Added recirculation (if 6–2, 5–3, or 4–4) or recircu- Based on Established This is the 31st published report of the ABA lation at the request of the dissenting (if 7–1) Checklist Committee (hereafter, ABA-CLC or or any accepting (if 3–5, 2–6, 1–7) member. Populations or New “the Committee”), covering deliberations dur- Records can circulate for up to three rounds, Distributional Records ing 2020. The primary role of the ABA-CLC at which point an 8–0 or 7–1 tally is needed is to consider the addition of new species to for acceptance of the species to the Checklist. ––––––––––––––––––––– (and, in rare cases, the removal of species ❑ Common from) the ABA Checklist. A secondary role Records reviewed by includes reviewing and revising ABA Codes the ABA-CLC in 2020 Wood-Pigeon covering ease of observation in the ABA Area. In 2020, the ABA-CLC voted on records of (Columba palumbus), The ABA-CLC consists of eight voting six species that would represent additions members who serve staggered four-year to the ABA Area, of which four were ac- ABA Code 5 terms; each year, two members typically cy- cepted and added to the ABA Checklist and ––––––––––––––––––––– cle off and are replaced by reelected or newly two were not accepted. Accounts for all six ❑ elected members. Members may be reelected species are provided here. In addition, and Pallas’s Gull after their first four-year term, but they must according to ABA Checklist convention, all (Ichthyaetus ichthyaetus), take at least one year off after two consecu- taxonomic and nomenclatural decisions of tive terms. Since our previous report (Pyle et the American Ornithological Society (AOS) ABA Code 5 al. 2019), the terms of Andrew Kratter and are automatically recognized by the ABA- ––––––––––––––––––––– David Sibley were up after four years of ser- CLC. This year, decisions by the AOS’s ❑ Pallas’s vice. Both members agreed to serve and were North American Classification Committee voted to serve an additional four years of ser- (Chesser et al. 2020, 2021) resulted in one Grasshopper-Warbler vice. Thus, the ABA-CLC membership will addition (Mexican Duck, Anas diazi) and (Helopsaltes certhiola), remain unchanged between 2020 and 2021. one removal (Northwestern Crow, Corvus For each record under consideration, mem- caurinus) of species from the ABA Checklist ABA Code 5 bers vote to accept or not accept a species to on taxonomic grounds, due to a split from ––––––––––––––––––––– the ABA Checklist based on evidence from one Mallard (A. platyrhynchos) and a lump with American Crow (C. brachyrhynchos), respec- ❑ Tricolored Munia tively. The common name of two species (Lonchura malacca), and scientific names of seven species on the Figure 1 • Common Wood-Pigeon. ABA Checklist have also been revised, and ABA Code 5 5 Sep 2019. La Romaine, Québec. linear sequences among and within several ––––––––––––––––––––– Photos © Denis Desjardins. 3 VOLUME 71 • NUMBER 2 (2020) 9 CHECKLIST COMMITTEE REPORT families were re-ordered, as discussed later in this report. The addition of four species reported here has increased the ABA Checklist to 1,120 species. New Species Accepted to the ABA Area Common Wood-Pigeon (Columba palumbus)—ABA-CLC Re- cord #2020–02 (8-0; May 2020). The CLC voted on a record of a Common Wood-Pigeon recorded at La Romaine, Quebec from 5–13 May 2019 (Fig. 1), following acceptance by the Quebec Bird Records Committee in Oct. 2019. The CLC had no issues with the identification, but some concern was expressed by mem- bers about the wood-pigeon’s natural occurrence (i.e., its possi- bly being an escapee or a ship-assisted vagrant). Photographs were not detailed enough to determine the age of the bird or assess it for signs of captivity. However, Common Wood-Pigeon numbers have increased and expanded northward in Europe over the past century (Cramp and Simmons 1985), they are now regularly recorded in Iceland, especially in spring (eBird 2020), and consideration of these distributional changes helped result in unanimous acceptance by the CLC on the first round. There is a previous report from Allan Brooks of a Common Wood-Pigeon aboard a ship crossing the Atlantic toward Newfoundland in May 1935 (Gosselin 1992), but it is unknown whether or not it re- mained aboard as the ship entered waters of the ABA Area. The record in Quebec presumably refers to the nominate subspecies of Europe, C. p. palumbus. Following Clements et al. (2019), the Common Wood-Pigeon is listed after Rock Pigeon (C. livia) in the ABA Checklist sequence. It is given ABA Code 5. Pallas’s Gull (Ichthyaetus ichthyaetus)—ABA-CLC Record #2020–01 (8-0; May 2020). The ABA-CLC voted unanimously to accept a record of a Pallas’s Gull from Shemya Island, Alas- ka 2–4 May 2019 (Fig. 2), following acceptance by the Alaska Checklist Committee in Nov 2019. It was an adult in defini- tive alternate plumage, leaving no questions about its identifica- tion. The bird perished on the last day of observation and was salvaged for the collection at the University of Alaska Museum (UAM 43,000), Fairbanks, where it was sexed as a female and determined to lack signs of captivity or ship assistance. Although only breeding east to central Asia, Pallas’s Gull winters as far south as southern India; it has become a near-annual vagrant to Japan (Brazil 2018); and it exhibits east–west trajectories during migration (Liu et al. 2018). Following Clements et al. (2019), the Pallas’s Gull is listed after Franklin’s Gull (Leucophaeus pipix- can) in the ABA Checklist sequence. It is given ABA Code 5. Pallas’s Grasshopper-Warbler (Helopsaltes certhiola)—ABA- CLC Record #2020–05 (8-0; May 2020). Following acceptance by the Alaska Checklist Committee in Apr 2020, the ABA-CLC voted unanimously to accept a record of a first-fall (formative) Pallas’s Grasshopper-Warbler from Gambell, Alaska 9–12 Sep 2019 (Fig. 3). The identification was fully supported by Asian bird experts 3 Figure 2 • Pallas’s Gull. 3 May 2019. Shemya I., Alaska. Photo © Richard A. Fischer. 10 NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS CHECKLIST COMMITTEE REPORT thological Society Records Tricolored Munia is listed after Scaly-breast- Committee (FOSRC) in ed Munia (L. punctulata) in the ABA Checklist 2014 (Greenlaw 2016), sequence. It is given ABA Code 5. the ABA-CLC considered adding Tricolored Munia Species Not Accepted as to the ABA Checklist but Additions to the ABA Area preferred to await more Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus)— documentation that the ABA-CLC Record #2018–02 (4-4, Sep 2019; closest populations of the 5-3, June 2020; 6-2, Aug 2020). At the re- species, in Cuba, were quest of the observer, the ABA-CLC consid- established according to ered and decided to circulate a report of a ABA standards (Pranty et Eurasian Sparrowhawk from Adak Island, al. 2014). Tricolored Mu- Alaska, 21 Sep 2016 (Fig. 5; see Pyle et al. nia had been considered 2019). The record includes two photographs abundant near Havana of the upperparts, partially obscured by veg- since the 1990s (Garrido etation, and an analysis by the observer of and Kirkconnell 2000); the bird’s size that concluded that it was too and subsequent data small for a Northern Goshawk (A. gentilis), from eBird (eBird 2020) the most likely contending species. The indicate that the species Alaska Checklist Committee deliberated 3 had become abundant over this record in 2017 and considered it in western Cuba as well, likely correct but, despite support of the Figure 3 • Pallas’s Grasshopper- with many recent checklist counts of over identification from Eurasian raptor experts, Warbler. 10 Sep 2019. Gambell, Alaska. 100 individuals. As such, the current ABA- considered the documentation not substan- Photo © Brad Benter. CLC had no problem considering Cuban tiated enough to add the species to the state populations of this prodigious species as list. Despite slowly gaining support through established, and unanimously accepted it three rounds of voting, the record failed to Peter Kennerley and Chris Goodie, who also as a vagrant of an exotic species to the ABA be accepted to the ABA Checklist by the ABA- noted no signs of hybridism with Midden- Checklist. The FORSC had established that CLC on the third and final round, by a 6-2 dorff’s Grasshopper-Warbler (H. ochotensis); it was extremely unlikely that caged munias vote. Supporters of the record pointed to hybridization has been reported from the may have been transported by Cuban refu- several field marks that, alone or when com- lower Amur River basin of Siberia (Kenner- gees (Greenlaw 2016), and evidence of the bined, eliminated Northern Goshawk (see ley and Pearson 2010).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us