Search for Light Dark Matter-Electron Scatterings in the PandaX-II Experiment Chen Cheng,2 Pengwei Xie,3 Abdusalam Abdukerim,1 Wei Chen,1 Xun Chen,1, 4 Yunhua Chen,5 Xiangyi Cui,3 Yingjie Fan,6 Deqing Fang,7 Changbo Fu,7 Mengting Fu,8 Lisheng Geng,9, 10 Karl Giboni,1 Linhui Gu,1 Xuyuan Guo,5 Ke Han,1 Changda He,1 Shengming He,5 Di Huang,1 Yan Huang,5 Yanlin Huang,11 Zhou Huang,1 Xiangdong Ji,12 Yonglin Ju,13 Shuaijie Li,3 Qing Lin,14, 15 Huaxuan Liu,13 Jianglai Liu,1, 3, 4, ∗ Liqiang Liu,5 Xiaoying Lu,16, 17 Wenbo Ma,1 Yugang Ma,7 Yajun Mao,8 Yue Meng,1, 4, y Parinya Namwongsa,1 Kaixiang Ni,1 Jinhua Ning,5 Xuyang Ning,1 Xiangxiang Ren,16, 17 Nasir Shaheed,16, 17 Changsong Shang,5 Guofang Shen,9 Lin Si,1 Andi Tan,12 Anqing Wang,16, 17 Hongwei Wang,18 Meng Wang,16, 17 Qiuhong Wang,7 Siguang Wang,8 Wei Wang,2 Xiuli Wang,13 Zhou Wang,1, 4 Mengmeng Wu,2 Shiyong Wu,5 Weihao Wu,1 Jingkai Xia,1 Mengjiao Xiao,12 Xiang Xiao,2 Binbin Yan,1 Jijun Yang,1 Yong Yang,1 Chunxu Yu,6 Jumin Yuan,16, 17 Ying Yuan,1 Xinning Zeng,1 Dan Zhang,12 Tao Zhang,1 Li Zhao,1 Qibin Zheng,11 Jifang Zhou,5 Ning Zhou,1 and Xiaopeng Zhou9 (PandaX-II Collaboration) 1School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai 200240, China 2School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China 3Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China 4Shanghai Jiao Tong University Sichuan Research Institute, Chengdu 610213, China 5Yalong River Hydropower Development Company, Ltd., 288 Shuanglin Road, Chengdu 610051, China 6School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China 7Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE), Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China 8School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 9School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 10International Research Center for Nuclei and Particles in the Cosmos & Beijing Key Laboratory of Advanced Nuclear Materials and Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 11School of Medical Instrument and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China 12Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA 13School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 14State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China 15Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China 16Research Center for Particle Science and Technology, Institute of Frontier and Interdisciplinary Science, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China 17Key Laboratory of Particle Physics and Particle Irradiation of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China 18Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China (Dated: May 10, 2021) We report constraints on light dark matter through its interactions with shell electrons in the PandaX-II liquid xenon detector with a total 46.9 tonne·day exposure. To effectively search for these very low energy electron recoils, ionization-only signals are selected from the data. 1821 can- didates are identified within ionization signal range between 50 to 75 photoelectrons, corresponding to a mean electronic recoil energy from 0.08 to 0.15 keV. The 90% C.L. exclusion limit on the scat- arXiv:2101.07479v2 [hep-ex] 7 May 2021 tering cross section between the dark matter and electron is calculated with systematic uncertainties properly taken into account. Under the assumption of point interaction, we provide the world's most stringent limit within the dark matter mass range from 15 to 30 MeV=c2, with the corresponding cross section from 2:5 × 10−37 to 3:1 × 10−38 cm2. The existence of dark matter (DM) is established by mass range with electrons, while still possible, is difficult overwhelming evidence in cosmological and astronomi- to be kinematically probed as the energy of electron re- cal observations [1]. Possible interactions between DM coils (ERs) is suppressed by the smallness of electron particles and baryonic matter have been searched for in mass. For sub-GeV light DM, on the other hand, the underground laboratories using ultra-low background de- nuclear recoil energy becomes much more difficult to de- tectors by directly detecting recoil signals [2, 3]. DM tect with conventional detection techniques. It was re- within a mass range between GeV=c2 to TeV=c2 have alized that these light DM can scatter with shell elec- been mostly searched for via its elastic scattering off trons, which may subsequently produce sufficiently large atomic nucleus [4{12]. The scatterings of DM within this ionization signals in the detector [13]. Such DM-electron 2 38 36 Run 9 Run 10 Run 11 34 32 30 28 26 24 Rate [events/day] 22 20 2015-12-25 2016-07-21 2017-02-15 2017-09-13 2018-04-10 2018-11-05 Date FIG. 1. Event rate of the US2 signals with charge range from 50 to 200 PE scatterings open up a new experimental paradigm, which calibration data. Events are further selected with a more has since been pursued by numbers of groups [14{19]. conservative radial cut so events within 15 cm from the The PandaX-II experiment [4, 20{29], located in the wall are removed to avoid un-paired field cage surface China Jinping Underground Laboratory (CJPL), utilizes events, leading to a 117.0 ± 6.6 kg fiducial mass of LXe. a dual-phase Time Projection Chamber (TPC), which The uncertainty is dominated by the 4.2 mm radial posi- contains an active cylindrical target with 580 kg of liq- uid xenon (LXe). DM scattering produces prompt scin- tillation photons (S1) in the liquid region, and ionized electron signal (S2) through delayed electroluminescence E [keV] 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 in the gaseous region. Both S1 and S2 can be detected by two arrays of Hamamatsu R11410-20 photomultiplier 0.9 tubes (PMTs) located at the top and bottom of the 0.8 cylindrical volume, with a corresponding photon detec- 0.7 tion efficiency and electron extraction efficiency around 0.6 10% and 50%, respectively [28]. Conventional analysis 0.5 0.4 searched for recoil energy from keV and above by requir- Efficiency Run 9 0.3 Trigger ing correlated S1 and S2 signals. In this work, we search Quality cut (tritium) 0.2 241 for light DM through its scattering off shell electrons, Quality cut ( Am-Be) E [keV] 0.1 Combined event selection which would produce energy deposition in the order of 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 100 eV [13]. In this region, S1 would be nearly invisible, 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0.9 but unpaired S2 (US2) signals can still be used to probe Ionization Signal [PE] 0.8 these scatterings effectively. 0.7 All DM search runs (Runs 9, 10, and 11), and calibra- 0.6 tion runs with tritium, 220Rn, and 241Am-Be sources are 0.5 used in this analysis. Most S2 related data quality cuts Runs 10/11 0.4 are inherited from previous analysis [28], including a S2 Efficiency Trigger 0.3 Quality cut (tritium) isolation time cut of 0.02 s [30], a position reconstruction Quality cut (241Am-Be) 0.2 quality cut to suppress single electron pileup due to mul- Quality cut (220Rn) 0.1 Combined event selection tiple scatterings, and a gate event cut which searches sub- threshold charge between 1.5-3.5 µs window preceding an 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Ionization Signal [PE] US2. Three cuts are tightened, including the full-width- 10%-maxima, the rising edge (defined as the ratio of the charge in the first 1 µs to the total), and the top/bottom FIG. 2. Data quality cut efficiency (red), trigger efficiency (blue) and combined efficiency (black) vs. detected ionization charge ratio of the US2s, based on the distribution of signals in the Run 9 (top) and Runs 10/11 (bottom). Details the ER calibration data [30]. Although the US2 data about the uncertainties are described in [30]. The quality are not intentionally blinded, which allows a confirma- cut efficiencies (dashed) from 241Am-Be and 220Rn calibration tion of the validity of the basic data quality cuts from runs are used to validate that from tritium. The upper axes previous analysis, cuts that are most relevant to the se- correspond to mean ER energy computed using the constant lection efficiency (S2 width, rising edge, and top/bottom model (fe = 0:83 and E = 13:7 eV × S2=SEG=EEE=fe, see ratio) are developed entirely based on multiple sets of Fig. 3). 3 tion resolution, estimated using different reconstruction 100 algorithms. The event distribution within the fiducial 90 volume (FV) is mostly uniform [30]. The radial cut effi- 80 ciency, since it has little dependence on the charge and characters of the US2s, is factored in the FV and expo- 70 sure. The time evolution of the surviving candidates in 60 the three DM search runs with charge range from 50 to 50 200 photoelectron (PE) is shown in Fig. 1, and appears 40 ROI Charge Yield Run 9 to be reasonably stable within a total time span of two 30 NEST 2.0 model years. 20 PandaX-II model Constant model The combined event selection efficiency for US2 events 10 127I X-ray data is a product of the trigger efficiency and data quality 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 cut efficiency.