Relations Between Brain and Cognitive Development

Relations Between Brain and Cognitive Development

Relations between Brain and Cognitive Development Kurt W.Fischer University of Denver and Haruard Unioersity FISCHER,KURTW. Relations between Brain and Cognitive Development. CHILDDEVELOPMENT, 1987, 58, 623-632. Goldman-Rakic reports important new data on cortical development in rhesus monkeys. Some of her findings, especially concurrent cortical synaptogenesis, may be related to cognitive capacities that develop in infancy. The developmental pattern of concurrent synap- togenesis in rhesus is consistent with a straightforward model of relations between brain and cogni- tive development: Concurrent synaptogenesis is hypothesized to lay the primary cortical foundation for a series of developmental levels in middle infancy that have been empirically documented in both human and rhesus infants. Other general brain changes, especially in the electroencepha- logram, also seem to correlate with these levels, as well as with other levels that develop at other periods. In the simplest form of the model, these several factors all show synchronous develop- mental discontinuities at the time of emergence of a level. Specific research methods are available for specifying when discontinuities occur in development of both brain and behavior. Obviously brain development relates to researchers had difficulty agreeing on even cognitive development. Developmental sci- the ages of emergence of major capacities entists generally make that assumption when (Biggs & Collis, 1982; Flavell, 1982; Gelman, they consider relations between brain and be- 1978). For brain development, researchers havior. Yet it has proved to be difficult to had produced relatively few data on specific establish specific developmental relations. neural changes that might relate to significant Global correlations exist, of course: Myelina- cognitive developments in human beings or tion occurs progressively throughout infancy, other primates. childhood, and even adolescence (Gibson, 1977; ~akbvlev& Lecours, 1967). ~bthden: As Goldman-Rakic (in this issue) sug- dritic branching and synaptic density change gests, however, the field of developmental systematically during infancy (Conel, 1939- neuroscience seems to have entered a new 1963; Goldman-Rakic, 1987, in this issue; era. At the same time, the field of cognitive Huttenlocher, 1979). During the same pe- development has also advanced, with major riods, children become progressively more in- new achievements in theory and method. As telligent by most criteria. Unfortunately, such a result of these advances in the two disci- correlations say little about real links between plines, there is genuine promise of the dis- brain and behavioral development because covery of meaningful links between specific they are too global. Any factors that show gen- brain and cognitive developments. Indeed, eral change with age will correlate with each two of the major sets of findings reported by other, as every statistics book demonstrates. Goldman-Rakic seem to have important im- To be meaningful, a relation must be speci- plications for links between brain and cogni- fied more precisely. For example, what partic- tive developments. ular changes in the brain relate to what One major set of findings is the provision specific new capacities emerging in children? of a relatively complete "wiring diagram" for In the past, the state of research in both a region of the prefrontal cortex in rhesus cognitive development and brain develop- monkeys, especially in terms of its relation to ment made it difficult to test hypothesized performance on a standard cognitive assess- specific relations. For cognitive development, ment tool, the delayed-response task (Gold- Preparation of this article was supported by a fellowship from the Cattell Fund and grants from the Spencer Foundation and the Camegie Corporation. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. I would like to thank Robert G. Anderson, Eric Fischer, Sandra Pipp, Sam Rose, and Sheldon White for their contributions to the concepts and data pre- sented and Bruce Pennington and Linda Crnic for their thoughtful editorial suggestions. The author is now at Harvard University. Address reprint requests to Kurt W. Fischer, Larsen Hall, Appian Way, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. [Child Development, 1987, 58,623-632. 8 1987 by the Society for Research in Child Development, Inc. All rights resewed. 0009392@/87/58050022$01.00] 624 Child Development man-Rakic, 1986). To my knowledge, this is be a general spurt in brain growth, as mea- the first such description of part of the neural sured by global indexes other than synap- basis of an intelligent behavior. togenesis itself. The second major set of findings is the Four levels of sensorimotor develop- phenomenon of concurrent cortical synapto- ment.-With recent advances in cognitive- genesis (Rakic, Bourgeois, Eckenhoff, Zecevic, developmental method and theory, research- & Goldman-Rakic, 1986). Neural connections ers have found clear-cut evidence for at least between parts of the cerebral cortex have al- four periods of rapid behavioral change in ready begun to form almost 2 months before infant development, often called develop- birth in rhesus, yet at birth rhesus behavior is mental levels or transitions. Data from a num- still far from the adult form. What happens ber of different laboratories have led to sim- during infancy is the formation of synapses, ilar conclusions (Comgan, 1983; Fischer & the links by which neurons communicate. In- Silvern, 1985; McCall, 1983; Seibert, Hogan, deed, synapse formation shows a sharp spurt & Mundy, 1984; Uzgiris, 1976). Based on and subsequent drop, and this pattern occurs longitudinal assessments with standardized across all areas investigated in the cortex. tests, McCall, Eichorn, and Hogarty (1977) There is no obvious developmental sequence found these rapid changes at 2-4 months, 7-8 in which one area shows synaptogenesis be- months, 12-13 months, and 18-21 months in fore another. It is this pattern that Goldman- human infants. (There may be additional pe- Rakic and her colleagues call concurrent sy- riods of rapid change in the first 4 months; see naptogenesis. Fischer, 1980, and Fischer & Hogan, in press.) As Goldman-Rakic points out, concurrent synaptogenesis relates closely in time to the Each of these periods of rapid change ap- appearance of an important cognitive advance pears to mark the emergence of a specific new on the delayed-response task, which involves cognitive capacity, as summarized in Table 1. what Piaget (193711954) called object perma- The new capacity does not lead to instanta- nence. This task requires the coordination of neous change in all skills, since it must be a number of cortical functions, and conse- applied to each individual skill to reconstruct quently it makes sense that synaptogenesis it in a more complex, advanced form. In this throughout the cortex should correspond to an way, many skills (but not all) will advance advance in performance on the task. Indeed, a within a relatively brief age period (Fischer & number of other skills develop at approxi- Pipp, 1984). Concurrent synaptogenesis may mately the same age, and all require a similar provide the cortical basis for these level- coordination of a number of cortical functions. specific capacities. Considered together with recent research At 2-4 months, human infants become in cognitive development, these findings sug- able to reliably control variations in a single gest two classes of hypotheses about relations action in the service of a simple goal. For ex- between brain and cognitive developments. ample, a 4-month-old girl can keep her gaze First, the spurt and subsequent drop in synap- on a face as it moves around in front of her, or togenesis may relate closely to certain key she can voluntarily grasp a rattle that is lying cognitive capacities that emerge in middle in- next to her, pursuing it until she gets hold of fancy. I will suggest a specific model of these it. Before 2 months, infants show little evi- relations as well as methods for testing them. dence of the capacity to reliably adopt such Second, the development of new general cog- actions. nitive capacities seems to involve concurrent changes in numerous areas of the cortex. Ap- At 7-8 months, infants demonstrate the parently, the coordination of the functions of ability to consistently relate a few actions in a diverse regions is necessary for major cogni- single unit. An 8-month-old boy can skillfully tive advances. pull a string to make a mobile jiggle, and he can look at a toy and use what he sees to guide his hand to grasp the toy in many dif- A Relation between Concurrent ferent locations. The delayed-response task Synaptogenesis and Sensorimotor studied by Diamond and Goldman-Rakic Development (1983; Diamond, 1985) involves this kind of Concurrent synaptogenesis may lay the eye-hand coordination. Other types of rela- primary cortical foundation for important cog- tions of actions also develop at this age, such nitive capacities that emerge in infancy. Dur- as the coordination of vocalization and hear- ing the period of synaptogenesis, new cogni- ing in the repetition of simple sounds such as tive capacities appear, and there also seems to "mamarna" (Rarnsay, 1984) and the coordina- Kurt W. Fischer 625 TABLE 1 FOURDOCUMENTEDSENSORIMOTOR LEVELS IN HUMANINFANTS Modal Age of Level Some Characteristic Behaviors Emergence Single sensorimotor actions . .. .. Single actions and perceptions; first social-

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us