LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 December 2009 3467 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 17 December 2009 The Council continued to meet at Nine o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JASPER TSANG YOK-SING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN IR DR THE HONOURABLE RAYMOND HO CHUNG-TAI, S.B.S., S.B.ST.J., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN THE HONOURABLE FRED LI WAH-MING, S.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE MARGARET NG THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG MAN-KWONG THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG DR THE HONOURABLE PHILIP WONG YU-HONG, G.B.S. THE HONOURABLE WONG YUNG-KAN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LAU KONG-WAH, J.P. THE HONOURABLE MIRIAM LAU KIN-YEE, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING, J.P. 3468 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 December 2009 THE HONOURABLE ANDREW CHENG KAR-FOO THE HONOURABLE TIMOTHY FOK TSUN-TING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LI FUNG-YING, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALBERT CHAN WAI-YIP THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK FUNG KIN-KEE, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE AUDREY EU YUET-MEE, S.C., J.P. THE HONOURABLE VINCENT FANG KANG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-HING, M.H. THE HONOURABLE LEE WING-TAT DR THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALAN LEONG KAH-KIT, S.C. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG KWOK-HUNG THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG HOK-MING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE RONNY TONG KA-WAH, S.C. THE HONOURABLE CHIM PUI-CHUNG PROF THE HONOURABLE PATRICK LAU SAU-SHING, S.B.S., J.P. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 December 2009 3469 THE HONOURABLE KAM NAI-WAI, M.H. THE HONOURABLE CYD HO SAU-LAN THE HONOURABLE STARRY LEE WAI-KING DR THE HONOURABLE LAM TAI-FAI, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAK-KAN THE HONOURABLE PAUL CHAN MO-PO, M.H., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, J.P. THE HONOURABLE TANYA CHAN DR THE HONOURABLE PRISCILLA LEUNG MEI-FUN DR THE HONOURABLE LEUNG KA-LAU THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG KWOK-CHE THE HONOURABLE WONG SING-CHI THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-KIN, B.B.S. THE HONOURABLE WONG YUK-MAN THE HONOURABLE IP WAI-MING, M.H. THE HONOURABLE IP KWOK-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE MRS REGINA IP LAU SUK-YEE, G.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PAN PEY-CHYOU THE HONOURABLE PAUL TSE WAI-CHUN DR THE HONOURABLE SAMSON TAM WAI-HO, J.P. 3470 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 December 2009 MEMBERS ABSENT: DR THE HONOURABLE DAVID LI KWOK-PO, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN THE HONOURABLE MRS SOPHIE LEUNG LAU YAU-FUN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LAU WONG-FAT, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ABRAHAM SHEK LAI-HIM, S.B.S., J.P. PUBLIC OFFICERS ATTENDING: THE HONOURABLE MATTHEW CHEUNG KIN-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. SECRETARY FOR LABOUR AND WELFARE PROF THE HONOURABLE K C CHAN, S.B.S., J.P. SECRETARY FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES AND THE TREASURY CLERKS IN ATTENDANCE: MRS CONSTANCE LI TSOI YEUK-LIN, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GENERAL MRS JUSTINA LAM CHENG BO-LING, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GENERAL LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 December 2009 3471 PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): Good morning. The meeting will now resume and the debate on "Formulating operational standards for public organizations" will continue. MEMBERS' MOTIONS FORMULATING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS Continuation of debate on motion which was moved on 16 December 2009 DR RAYMOND HO (in Cantonese): Good morning, President. At different times and under different circumstances, many public organizations were established in Hong Kong, each with its unique objectives outside the Government in order to enhance flexibility. While enjoying the operational autonomy that they need, many of them operate under commercial principles, and some operate in the form of subvented organizations. These organizations have appointed quite a number of independent individuals from the community to their managing boards, and some of them are required to undergo value-for-money audits of the Audit Commission. However, the governance problems of these organizations have still aroused the concerns of society from time to time. The Director of Audit, through value-for-money audits, has revealed a lot of administrative problems with these public organizations, and examples are too many to enumerate. These include some cases that happened several years ago, such as the extravagance and chaotic management of the Tourism Commission, the spending of $180,000 by the Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute Company Limited on fengshui matters, and other governance problems. A more recent case was the one concerning the Hong Kong Productivity Council, in which three high-ranking officers transferred from the civil service or subvented bodies were found to be enjoying double housing benefits, and large quantities of fixed assets were found missing. These examples have aroused a public outcry. Such endless public organization scandals are similar in nature, often involving expenses on remuneration, chaotic administration and waste of public money. It is difficult to convince the public that they are just isolated cases 3472 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 December 2009 having nothing to do with the structural problems of public organizations. As these organizations are all funded by the public coffers, the Government has the responsibility to adopt suitable measures in order to ensure that their governance can live up to public expectations. Even though these public organizations are outside the government bureaucracy and enjoy operational autonomy, representatives are still appointed by the Government to sit on their management committees. These representatives are obliged to meticulously and closely monitor the operations and decision-making processes of these organizations in order to ensure that their decisions comply with and manifest their founding objectives and tally with the community's overall interests. As for those which operate in accordance with commercial principles, the Government's monitoring is particularly important. As the remunerations of the high-ranking executives of some individual public bodies are linked to profits, they may place too much emphasis on profitability and business development at the expense of their founding objectives. The audits by the Audit Commission on public bodies have been playing an important role. Apart from disclosing their various problems, more importantly, such audits can enable the organizations to identiy their specific problems, thus prompting them to roll out improvement measures for ensuring the proper use of public money. As far as I know, public organizations which do not receive recurrent funding are not subject to the Director of Audit's monitoring. Although these organizations have put internal audit mechanisms in place and are required to appoint independent auditors from the outside to carry out audits, regular value-for-money audits by the Director of Audit should still be an appropriate arrangement for enhancing their transparency. In order to ensure that the operation of public organizations can live up to public expectations, the Government should enhance their accountability and transparency. While enjoying operational autonomy, they should also uphold the spirit of accountability. President, I so submit. Thank you. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 17 December 2009 3473 MR WONG TING-KWONG (in Cantonese): Good morning, President. I think that the motion debate moved by Mrs Regina IP is a very timely one, and I also maintain that it is necessary to enhance the supervision of some public organizations because there are dozens of public organizations in Hong Kong with portfolios involving various aspects, sectors and industries, and the operation of many of them is far from transparent. Therefore, speaking of the 10 wrongs of public organizations mentioned by Mr WONG Kwok-hing last night, I think we should draw a lesson from them. Nevertheless, I think we should not take a lopsided stance, so I also want to put in a fair word. Recently, following all the media reports, we all know that the Audit Commission has pointed out that the internal management of the Hong Kong Productivity Council (HKPC) is very chaotic. But the other side of the story is that the HKPC has been providing a lot of assistance to various industries. In particular, it has assisted many manufacturers in the Pearl River Delta in resolving problems connected with their upgrading, restructuring and production, apart from helping them resolve many other thorny problems. I think we should put in a fair word for them. Today, President, I would like to focus on the issue of competing with the private sector for profits mentioned in the original motion. In my opinion, the difference between competing with the public for profits and serving the public lies in the word "public". Who are the "public"? Does the word "public" refer to the service recipients, or just a small group of people? The case of the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (TDC) is an example. I think the exhibitions and trade fairs organized by the TDC for the various trades and industries are in fact welcomed by them. The TDC's services are good, charges are low and the effect is excellent. However, some exhibition companies consider that the TDC is competing with them for profits.