Inter-System PPP Ambiguity Resolution Between GPS and Beidou for Rapid Initialization

Inter-System PPP Ambiguity Resolution Between GPS and Beidou for Rapid Initialization

Journal of Geodesy manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Inter-system PPP ambiguity resolution between GPS and BeiDou for rapid initialization Jianghui Geng · Xiaotao Li · Qile Zhao · Guangcai Li Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract Rapid ambiguity resolution in precise point resolvable ambiguity is contributed during the transi- positioning (PPP-AR) has constantly been a difficulty tion from intra- to inter-GPS/BeiDou PPP-AR while preventing efficient initializations of user solutions. A both actually have the same model strength. Moreover, successful initialization normally requires a few tens of we provide a preliminary theoretical framework to im- minutes if only GPS data are processed, but can be plement inter-GNSS or tightly-coupled GNSS models accelerated significantly by integrating a second GNSS which can be extended to other multi-GNSS analysis. to both enhance the satellite geometry for faster am- biguity convergence and double the ambiguity quan- tity for higher partial-AR success rates. However, each Keywords GPS · BeiDou · Precise point positioning · GNSS asks for its own reference satellite to form re- Inter-system ambiguity resolution · Inter-system bias solvable ambiguities, namely intra-system PPP-AR. We propose to estimate station-specific inter-system phase biases (ISPBs) and then form resolvable ambiguities be- tween, instead of within, GNSS (i.e., inter-system PPP- 1 Introduction AR) aiming at providing one more ambiguity candidate for more efficient partial AR. We use 24 days of 5 s GPS/BeiDou data from 47 stations in China spanning an area of roughly 2000×2000 km to carry out both Integer ambiguity resolution at a single GNSS (Global intra- and inter-GPS/BeiDou PPP-AR. We find that Navigation Satellite System) station secures centimeter- about 85% of ISPBs vary minimally within 0.05 cycles level precise point positioning (PPP) accuracy (e.g., Ge from day to day, favoring precise predictions for real- et al., 2008; Zumberge et al., 1997). It is also of great time PPP-AR, despite the rare subdaily ISPB anoma- importance to signifying a successful PPP initialization lies of up to 0.1 cycles and abrupt jumps of up to 0.3 cy- which can hardly be known objectively when keeping cles at a few stations. From hourly kinematic solutions, float ambiguities. Unfortunately, rapid PPP ambiguity we find that 42.3% of them can be initialized success- resolution (i.e., PPP-AR) has constantly been a difficult fully within 5 minutes in case of inter-GPS/BeiDou problem due largely to the low precision of pseudorange PPP-AR in contrast to only 29.7% in case of intra- measurements and the slow change of satellite geome- GPS/BeiDou. The mean initialization time is therefore try. We usually need a few tens of minutes of continuous reduced appreciably from 649 s to 586 s. This 10% im- observations to ensure correct GPS-only PPP-AR (e.g., provement, though minor, is reasonable and still en- Geng et al., 2011). couraging on account of the fact that only one extra A couple of approaches have been developed to achieve J. Geng · X. Li · Q. Zhao · G. Li GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China faster PPP-AR. One widely known strategy is to intro- Collaborative Innovation Center of Geospatial Technology, duce ionosphere corrections with an accuracy of a few Wuhan, China centimeters to speed up (re-)convergences to ambiguity- E-mail: [email protected] fixed solutions (e.g., Geng et al., 2010; W¨ubbena et al., 2 Jianghui Geng et al. 2005, among others). However, such high-precision iono- the presence of inter-system phase biases (ISPBs) be- sphere products cannot be easily attained over wide tween GPS and Galileo at the station end which ham- areas, hence confining rapid PPP-AR to a regional- per the formation of resolvable double-difference am- only service. In this case, multi-frequency and multi- biguities between diverse receiver types. They further constellation GNSS data can be a more preferable so- found, and Paziewski and Wielgosz(2015) later con- lution. Geng and Bock(2013) demonstrated the po- firmed, with several hours of data, that ISPBs are in tential of simulated triple-frequency GPS data in favor general quite stable over time with a standard devia- of rapid PPP-AR gained within 2 minutes with 78% tion of a few thousandth cycle. Odijk et al.(2017) ap- of all epochs resolved. Li et al.(2017) showed that plied ISPB corrections to single-frequency RTK based PPP-AR can be achieved on average from 33.6 min- on GPS, Galileo, QZSS and NAVIC L5 signals, and utes for GPS-only solutions to 24.6 minutes for inte- found that inter-system AR, in contrast to intra-system grated GPS/BeiDou solutions over the Asian-Oceanic AR, can improve the availability of ambiguity-fixed epochs region. For central Europe, Geng and Shi(2017) rein- dramatically from 29% to 96% in case of incomplete forced that integrated GPS/GLONASS PPP-AR can GNSS constellations. While all attempts above were as- be accomplished within about 6 minutes thanks to the sociated with overlap frequencies, Gao et al.(2017) in- greatly enhanced satellite geometry in high-latitude ar- vestigated the feasibility of performing inter-system AR eas. Later, Liu et al.(2017) combined GPS, GLONASS between non-overlap frequencies from GPS and Bei- and BeiDou data over a China region and reached suc- Dou. It was stated that a single-difference ambiguity cessful PPP-AR within 10 minutes for 90% of all test with a wavelength of a few millimeters has to be taken solutions. All these studies, albeit specific to regional into account along with ISPBs before forming a re- or continental areas, corroborated the expectation that solvable inter-GPS/BeiDou double-difference ambigu- introducing more GNSS satellites can indeed contribute ity. With two medium-length baselines, they reported to faster PPP-AR. that the time to first fix could be shortened by a few seconds in case of inter-GPS/BeiDou AR, compared to Moreover, Geng and Shi(2017) found that if more intra-GPS/BeiDou AR, if only seven or fewer satellites ambiguities contribute to partial AR where only a sub- were usable. In addition, Khodabandeh and Teunissen set of candidates are fixed to initialize PPP, its suc- (2016) analyzed in theory the implications of ISPBs to cess rate will be improved considerably from 60% to inter-system PPP-AR which were formulated using un- over 80%. This explains in part why multi-GNSS PPP- differenced uncombined observables. AR can be achieved within a shorter observation pe- riod than that required by GPS-only trials. Recalling In this study, we develop an approach of forming that multi-GNSS PPP-AR is normally carried out ex- inter-system ambiguities using GPS and BeiDou data clusively within each GNSS (e.g., Geng and Shi, 2017; modulated on diverse frequencies with the intent of in- Li et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017), namely intra-system vestigating the potential of inter-system PPP-AR in or loosely-coupled PPP-AR where each GNSS has its further speeding up initializations. The article is out- own reference satellite, we conceive of an idea that inter- lined as follows. Section2 details the methods of both system or tightly-coupled PPP-AR where oppositely all intra- and inter-system PPP-AR, and the strategy of GNSS share one reference satellite may further reduce calculating ISPBs. Section3 exhibits the GPS/BeiDou the initialization time, because the number of resolvable data and the processing schemes, whereas section4 ambiguities will grow, though merely by one. illustrates the achievement of rapid PPP-AR due to inter-GPS/BeiDou data processing. Section5 addresses Inter-system AR has been studied mostly on double- relevant issues on ISPBs and inter-GPS/BeiDou ambi- difference ambiguities formed on overlap frequencies among guities. Conclusions are drawn in section6. GNSS, such as the L5 frequency shared by GPS, Galileo, QZSS (Quasi-Zenith Satellite System) and NAVIC (NAV- igation with Indian Constellation). Julien et al.(2003) simulated Galileo data on E1 and E5a which overlap 2 Methods the GPS L1 and L5 frequencies, respectively, and found that the initialization time in case of inter-GPS/Galileo AR on a 20-km baseline could be a few seconds shorter than that of intra-GPS/Galileo AR. With real observa- For dual-frequency PPP-AR, usually the undifferenced tions, Odijk and Teunissen(2013) began to be aware of Melbourne-W¨ubbena (Melbourne, 1985; W¨ubbena, 1985) and the ionosphere-free combination observables be- Inter-GPS/BeiDou PPP-AR 3 tween station i and satellite k are both used tions1 and2, that is 8 Lk > ^ k i;m > Ni;m = 8 k k k k > λs;m gsLi;1 − Li;2 gsPi;1 + Pi;2 > > Lk = − > > i;m > k s k > gs − 1 gs + 1 > = N˘ + b − b (3a) > < i;m i;m m > k s k <> =λs;m Ni;m + bi;m − bm λ > ^ k ^ k s;m k (1) >λs;nNi;1 = λs;1Ni;3 − Nei;m > g2 1 > gs + 1 > Lk = s Lk − Lk > > i;3 g2 − 1 i;1 g2 − 1 i;2 > > s s > = λ N˘ k + bs − bk (3b) > : s;n i;1 i;n n :> k k s k =ρi + λs;1 Ni;3 + bi;3 − b3 where k ˘ k ^s ^k Nei;m = Ni;m + bi;m − bm (4) where ^ k ^ k ^ k and Ni;m, Ni;1 and Ni;3 denote the wide-lane, narrow- lane and ionosphere-free ambiguity estimates, respec- 8 λ tively; N˘ k and N˘ k denote the nominal integer wide- > λ N k =λ N k + s;m N k i;m i;1 < s;1 i;3 s;n i;1 i;m lane and narrow-lane ambiguities which contain the in- gs + 1 (2) teger parts of UPDs; bs and bs are the station FCBs :> k k k i;m i;n Ni;m =Ni;1 − Ni;2 for wide-lane and narrow-lane ambiguities, respectively, k k k whereas bm and bn are the satellite FCBs; Nei;m is the re- solved wide-lane ambiguity comprising FCB corrections ^s ^k fs;1 bi;m and bm.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us