Study on the Transmission of Coconut Lethal Yellowing in Ghana

Study on the Transmission of Coconut Lethal Yellowing in Ghana

AGRONOMIE – ENVIRONNEMENT Study on the transmission of coconut Lethal Yellowing in Ghana 1 René PHILIPPE Abstract: 1 Research on the Cape Saint Paul Wilt Disease (CSPWD) vector in Ghana began from 1990 Simon REIGNARD (1990-1997; 2002-2004) and did not give convincing results. From July 2005, new test standards 1 Sophie DESCAMPS were applied: shading, daily collections and releasing of insects at the less hot hours and use of various 2 Joe NKANSAH-POKU sizes of cages and test plants. More than 70,000 Myndus. adiopodoumeensis were introduced in cage Robert QUAICOE2 for 28 months (520 adults/seedling/month). Controls in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on the five Fabian PILET1 coconut of this Myndus cage and on 935 adults were always negative. The tests of transmission with Sandrine FABRE3 M. adiopodoumeensis apparently not a vector of the disease were thus stopped. The phytoplasma of Michel DOLLET3 the CSPWD was identified by PCR in a coconut having received 4,380 Diostrombus (four species of Derbidae) 4 months after the beginning of the test. This coconut never presented symptom of the dis- 1 CIRAD, Département BIOS, UPR29, ease 28 months later and all the successive PCR were negative. Auchenorrhyncha collected by sweeping P.O. Box 245, Sekondi, Ghana on the adventitious plants in and around the plot during the day were also tested without success. The <[email protected]> hypothesis of a ground transmission was also taken into account because of the presence of scale in- 2 OPRI, Coconut Programme, sects and nematodes. P.O. Box 245, Sekondi, Ghana Key words: lethal yellowing, vector, Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha, scale insects, coconut, Ghana 3 CIRAD, Département BIOS, UPR29, Campus international de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier, France Phytoplasmas are known to be associated with Identification of vector insects by experimen- with the same species after spending 3 days in- coconut Lethal Yellowing (LY). It is also known tally reproducing disease symptoms under side a large sleeve on a diseased coconut palm. that all phytoplasma diseases are transmitted controlled conditions is essential [9]. It will en- The aim was to check for the existence of the by leafhoppers (Membracidae, Cicadellidae), able optimum application of all the researches phytoplasma in the insects and in the nursery planthoppers (Delphacidae, Cixiidae, to be undertaken for a better understanding of plants using the PCR analysis method. A PCR Derbidae, etc.) or Psyllidae [1]. These the epidemiology and for designing control analysis laboratory was set up by DFID (ex- Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha [12-15] also methods. NRI) at the University of Legon (Accra). The play a role in transmitting viral diseases of We describe here the work being conducted in nursery plants did not display any yellowing palms [2-6]. Ghana to search for the Cape Saint Paul Wilt symptoms and the PCR analyses were negative. (CSPW) vector. To date, only the Cixiidae Myndus crudus has From the end of 2002 onwards, an Agricultural been experimentally identified as an effective Services Sub-Sectors Investments Programme vector of LY, and only in Florida [7]. Thus, it is History of disease (AGSSIP) budget made it possible to relaunch only in Florida that it has been possible to de- transmission studies in Ghana two series of disease transmission trials. The in- tect the existence of the LY phytoplasma in the sects also underwent an acquisition phase. No body of M. crudus through an electronic micro- The first disease transmission studies were un- positive PCR case was obtained. In the second scope. At that time, there was no check by po- dertaken with World Bank funding from 1990 series, a plant onto which all the Derbidae spe- lymerase chain reaction (PCR). Cloning and se- to 1992. A European Union project (STD 3) cies had been released gave a positive PCR anal- quencing were not in practice. So, it is difficult then took over from 1993 to 1997. ysis. DNA sequencing showed that it was not to say that the phytoplasma observed was re- Starting in 1990, 18,000-20,000 Myndus adio- that of the phytoplasma responsible for CSPW. ally that of coconut LY in Florida. podoumeensis Synave (Cixiidae) and around 20,000 Derbidae and other Homoptera were doi: 10.1684/ocl.2009.0248 However, it has so far been impossible to con- tested in large cages (6.7 × 6.7 × 7.5 m) with firm the role of Myndus as a vector in Jamaica or New transmission studies one 6- to 7-year-old West Africa Tall (WAT) per in Mexico. cage. Some enigmatic results were obtained, under project FSP 2004-34 In Tanzania, the Derbidae Diostrombus mkuran- which were not backed up by PCR tests at the The CSPW transmission trials began in July gai Wilson and Meenoplus sp (Meenoplidae)are time [10, 11]. 2005 with new experimental conditions: suspected by the sole fact that LY phytoplasma Starting in January 1996, attempts were made has been detected by the PCR technique [8]. in medium-sized cages to transmit the disease – Construction of a shade over each cage; 102 OCL VOL. 16 N° 2 MARS-AVRIL 2009 – Insects were collected in the morning from Table 1. Tests of Homoptera collected in sweep nets for lethal yellowing transmission on coconut palms aged 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. and in the evening from 12–18 months. 4 p.m. to 5.30 p.m.; – – Those insects were released immediately into Species Jan Oct 2006 Average insects/ the respective cages after each of the two daily (Total insects/ month/plant collections. three plants/10 months) Small Cicadellidae 4,801 160 Large Cicadellidae + Cercopidae 12,822 427 Material and method + Pentatomidae + Flatidae Medium-sized cages Total: Jan-Oct 2006 17,623 587 – An initial set of five shaded cages (2.2 × 2.2 × Species Nov 2006 Mar 2008 Average insects/ (Total insects/two month/plant 2.2 m) housed Myndus and Derbidae; All a Homoptera that are collected with sweep net plants/17 months) from the plant cover under the coconut palms Small Cicadellidae 9,498 279 and around the coconut plot; a control with – Large Cicadellidae 22,343 657 shade; a control without shade six 12 to 18- Pentatomidae 421 12 month-old nursery plants (3 Malayan Red Cercopidae 3,435 101 Dwarf palms [MRD] and 3 Malayan Yellow Flatidae 275 8 Dwarf palms [MYD]) per cage; each plant was fitted with a sleeve. Total: Nov 2006-Mar 2008 35,972 1,058 A medium-sized cage was reserved for the small aThe plants of the second series from November 2006 to March 2008 were different from those in the first se- and large sucking insects collected at the two ries from Jan to October 2006. periods of the day using a sweep net in the her- baceous cover inside and around the plot. Those insects belonged to two major groups of one control cage. These insects were released found; second group with Patara armata (Van Homoptera: leafhoppers (Cicadellidae and onto three plants (MYD × VTT) over 2 years Stalle); third group with four species of Cercopidae) and planthoppers (Delphacidae, old, placed in each cage without sleeve. Diostrombus in a mixture: D. mayumbensis Achilidae, Meenoplidae), along with a few Note: The cages have a red wooden or metal (Synave), D. dilatatus (Westwood), D. luteus Heteroptera (Pentatomidae). (angle iron) frame and they are covered with a (Muir), D. nitidus (Muir). μ First series: Six nursery plants (three MRD and polyester sleeve (Fyltis) with 600 or 800 – One plant that received an average of 4380 three MYD) aged 12 to 18 months per cage; meshes. Diostrombus (table 2), tested positive in PCR. In each plant was fitted with a sleeve. From July addition, the DNA was identified after cloning to December 2005, it proved possible to release Results and sequencing as being that of the LY a total of 9910 insects, that is, an average of phytoplasma. around 275 insects per plant per month. – Second series: Two plants were kept (one MYD With medium-sized cages Unfortunately, that plant did not display dis- ease symptoms. Subsequent PCR analyses (2 and one MRD) from the previous six. One plant Myndus adiopodoumeensis received only small leafhoppers, the other only and 4 months later) did not reveal the presence This test was halted after 4 months and the large leafhoppers + Pentatomidae + Flatidae of the phytoplasma.That may have been due plants were kept under a veranda that was + Cercopidae (table 1). to the fact that: sunny but protected from any visiting Third series: Two new plants were introduced • Homoptera. None of the coconut plants receiv- the plants were too young and the sap did (MYD × VTT = Vanuatu Tall) (table 1). ing 1,400 M. adiopodoumeensis adults for not offer good conditions for phytoplasma de- 4 months displayed any disease symptoms velopment and, Large cages 27 months after the trial was halted. • the plants under shade were not traumatized Myndus adiopodoumeensis1 Derbidae and were able to more effectively resist any A large cage (3 × 3 × 3.5 m) was constructed phytoplasma aggression. Three groups of two plants each fitted with a to house five hybrid coconut seedlings sleeve were placed in the medium-sized This plant was also kept under the sunny ve- (MYD × VTT) not covered with a sleeve. Derbidae cage: first group with Metaphenice randa protected from any visiting Homoptera. 1 Derbidae stellulata (Boheman), a species in which a phy- It did not express any disease symptoms Three large cages (4 × 4 × 4 m) housed, toplasma different from that of CSPW has been 27 months after insect releases were halted. respectively, four species of Diostrombus: D. mayumbensis, D. nitidus, D. luteus, D.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us