2004 Utah Football in Review

2004 Utah Football in Review

2004 UTAH FOOTBALL IN REVIEW A QUICK LOOK AT 2004 2004 UTAH FOOTBALL SCHEDULE (12-0, 7-0 MWC) Overall Mountain West Conference Champions 12-0 record Tostitos Fiesta Bowl Champion 12 wins is the most in school history Date Opponent Result TV First unbeaten, untied season at Utah since 1930 9- 2 Texas A&M W, 41-21 ESPN 16-game win streak ties the school record 9-11 at Arizona W, 23-6 KJZZ 9-18 at Utah State W, 48-6 KJZZ Mountain West Conference 9-25 Air Force* (HC) W, 49-35 ESPN+Plus 7-0 record ties the Utah mark for league wins 10-1 at New Mexico* W, 28-7 ESPN2 Only back-to-back MWC champions in league history 10-16 North Carolina W, 46-16 KJZZ First unbeaten league mark since 1953 10-23 UNLV* W, 63-28 KJZZ 10-30 at San Diego State* W, 51-28 KJZZ Postseason 11-6 Colorado State* W, 63-31 ESPN2 Beat Pittsburgh 35-7 in the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl 11-13 at Wyoming* W, 45-28 ABC First BCS game for Utah or any non-BCS team 11-20 Brigham Young* W, 52-21 ESPN2 1-1 PIttsburgh+ 35-7 ABC National Rankings *Mountain West Conference game; +Tostitos Fiesta Bowl No. 4 Associated Press Final Ranking No. 5 Coaches Final Ranking UTAH FINAL RANKINGS ON OFFENSE No. 6 BCS Ranking (first non-BCS team ever to finish in the top 6) Category .................................. Avg. ........ MWC ......NCAA Rushing Offense ......................... 236.1 ....... 2 ............. 13 Other 2004 Notables Passing Offense ......................... 263.7 ....... 2 ............. 19 Highest ranked Utah team ever (No. 4 AP, No. 5 Coaches, No. 6 BCS) Pass Efficiency ........................... 173.45 ..... 1 ............. 3 Set a home attendance record (44,112) Total Offense .............................. 499.8 ....... 1 ............. 3 4-0 vs. BCS teams Scoring Offense .......................... 45.3 ......... 1 ............. 3 1-0 vs. the Big 12 (Texas A&M) 1-0 vs. the ACC (North Carolina) UTAH FINAL RANKINGS ON DEFENSE 1-0 vs. the Big East (Pittsburgh) Category .................................. Avg. ........ MWC ......NCAA 1-0 vs. the Pac-10 (Arizona) Rushing Defense ........................ 140.2 ....... 3 ............. 48 Six games on national TV (ABC 2, ESPN 1, ESPN2 3) Passing Defense ........................ 203.2 ....... 2 ............. 45 6-0 on national TV Pass Efficiency Defense ............. 108.92 ..... 1 ............. 24 Total Defense .............................. 343.4 ....... 2 ............. 39 2004 Team Captains Scoring Defense ......................... 19.5 ......... 2 ............. 22 Bo Nagahi, Sione Pouha, Morgan Scalley, Alex Smith, Paris Warren UTAH FINAL INDIVIDUAL RANKINGS Player, Category ....................... PG .......... MWC ......NCAA Alex Smith, pass efficiency ......... 176.52 ..... 1 .............2 UTAH’S 2004 WEEKLY RANKINGS Alex Smith, total offense ............. 298.6 ....... 1 .............5 Alex Smith, passing .................... 246 .......... 1 .............n/a Date AP Coaches BCS Opponent Result Paris Warren, receptions ............ 6.67 ......... 1 .............17 7-30* ......................... 21 ..............................none Paris Warren, receiving yards .... 89.7 ......... 2 .............19 8-14* ..........20 .............................................none Steve Savoy, scoring .................. 8.5 ........... 1 .............18 8-29 .......................... 19 ..............................Texas A&M ............W, 41-21 Steve Savoy, receptions ............. 5.58 ......... 3 .............28 9-5 .............17 .......... 16 ..............................Arizona ..................W, 23-6 Steve Savoy, receiving yards ..... 80.1 ......... 5 .............29 9-12 ...........15 .......... 14 ..............................Utah State .............W, 48-6 Marty Johnson, scoring .............. 7.5 ........... 2 .............38 9-19 ...........14 .......... 14 ..............................Air Force ................W, 49-35 Morgan Scalley, interceptions ..... .50 ........... 1 .............4 9-26 ...........14 .......... 14 ..............................New Mexico ...........W, 28-7 Eric Weddle, interceptions .......... .36 ........... 4 .............33 10-3 ...........11 .......... 11 ..............................none Matt Kovacevich, punting ........... 41.7 ......... 5 .............45 10-10 .........11 .......... 10 ..............................North Carolina .......W, 46-16 10-17 .........9 ............ 10 ............. 7 ..............UNLV .....................W, 63-28 10-24 .........9 ............ 10 ............. 6 ..............San Diego State ....W, 51-28 FINAL 2004 MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE STANDINGS 10-31 .........7 ............ 8 ............... 6 ..............Colorado State ......W, 63-31 Team MWC Overall 11-7 ............7 ............ 8 ............... 7 ..............Wyoming ...............W, 45-28 1. Utah 7-0 12-0 11-14 ..........5 ............ 6 ............... 6 ..............Brigham Young ......W, 52-21 2. New Mexico 5-2 7-5 11-21 ..........5 ............ 6 ............... 6 ..............none 3. Brigham Young 4-3 5-6 11-28 ..........5 ............ 6 ............... 6 ..............none 4. Wyoming 3-4 7-5 12-5 ...........5 ............ 6 ............... 6 ..............none Air Force 3-4 5-6 1-4 .............4 ............ 5 ................................Pittsburgh ..............W, 35-7 Colorado State 3-4 4-7 *Preseason rankings; +Final ranking 7. San Diego State 2-5 4-7 8. UNLV 2-5 3-8 www.UtahUtes.com 1 UTAH IN THE NATIONAL RANKINGS UTAH NATIONAL RANKING RECORDS ASSOCIATED PRESS TOP 25 JAN. 4, 2005—FINAL • No. 4 Associated Press final ranking (previous record was No. 10 in 1994) • No. 5 Coaches final ranking (previous record was No. 8 in 1994) No. Team ........................Record .....Points 1. USC (62) ..................13-0 ............1,622 • Received a preseason AP ranking for the first time ever (No. 20) 2. Auburn (3) ................13-0 ............1,559 • Received a preseason Coaches ranking for the first time ever (No. 21) 3. Oklahoma .................12-1 ............1,454 4. Utah .........................12-0 ............1,438 • Ranked in the Top 25 all season in both polls (16 straight weeks AP, 17 straight weeks Coaches) 5. Texas ........................11-1 ............1,391 • Ranked in the top 10 in the last nine AP and Coaches polls 6. Louisville ..................11-1 ............1,261 7. Georgia ....................10-2 ............1,204 • Ranked in the BCS standings all eight weeks 8. Iowa ..........................10-2 ............ 1,111 • Highest first-week BCS ranking ever for a non-BCS team (No. 7) 9. California ..................10-2 ............1,060 • Highest final BCS ranking ever for a non-BCS team (No. 6) 10. Virginia Tech .............10-3 ...............996 • First non-BCS team to be ranked in the top 7 all eight weeks 11. Miami ........................9-3 .................917 • First non-BCS team to earn an automatic BCS bowl berth 12. Boise State ...............11-1 ...............888 13. Tennessee ................10-3 ...............868 14. Michigan ...................9-3 .................842 15. Florida State .............9-3 .................754 16. LSU ..........................9-3 .................711 BOWL CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES STANDINGS (DEC. 5, 2004) 17. Wisconsin .................9-3 .................482 18. Texas Tech ...............8-4 .................476 Team A.P. Coaches Computer 19. Arizona State ............9-3 .................463 Rank Rank Rank Points Avg. Pvs. 20. Ohio State ................8-4 .................423 21. Boston College .........9-3 .................314 1. USC 1 1 2 97 .9770 1 22. Fresno State .............9-3 .................203 2. Oklahoma 2 2 1 99 .9681 2 23. Virginia .....................8-4 .................157 3. Auburn 3 3 3 92 .9331 3 24. Navy .........................10-2 ...............126 4. Texas 6 5 4 88 .8476 5 25. Pittsburgh .................8-49 ...............919 5. California 4 4 6 80 .8347 4 6. Utah 5 6 5 83 .8181 6 ESPN/USA TODAY TOP 25 7. Georgia 8 7 8 67 .6966 7 8. Virginia Tech 9 9 T-9 65 .6712 12 JAN. 4, 2005—FINAL 9. Boise State 10 10 7 76 .6564 8 10. Louisville 7 8 13 52 .6490 9 No. Team ........................Record .....Points 11. LSU 12 11 T-9 65 .6109 11 1. USC (61) ..................13-0 ............1,525 12. Iowa 11 13 12 55 .5553 13 2. Auburn ......................13-0 ............1,460 13. Michigan 13 12 17 38 .5058 14 3. Oklahoma .................12-1 ............1,366 14. Miami (FL) 14 14 T-14 45 .4705 10 4. Texas ........................11-1 ............1,324 15. Tennessee 15 17 T-14 45 .4057 15 5. Utah .........................12-0 ............1,300 16. Florida State 17 15 21 22 .3466 16 6. Georgia ....................10-2 ............1,191 17. Wisconsin 16 16 20 24 .3439 17 7. Louisville ..................11-1 ............1,166 18. Virginia 18 18 18 30 .2983 18 8. Iowa ..........................10-2 ............1,022 19. Arizona State 21 24 11 56 .2700 19 9. California ..................10-2 ...............937 20. Texas A&M 22 25 16 44 .2225 20 10. Virginia Tech .............10-3 ...............906 21. Pittsburgh 19 20 NR 0 .1546 23 11. Miami ........................9-3 .................903 22. Texas Tech 23 21 22 19 .1489 21 12. Michigan ...................9-3 .................802 23. Florida 20 19 NR 0 .1375 22 13. Boise State ...............11-1 ...............792 24. Oklahoma State 32 28 19 25 .0943 24 14. Florida State .............9-3 .................776 25. Ohio State 24 22 NR 4 .0847 25 15. Tennessee ................10-3 ...............771 16. LSU ..........................9-3 .................693

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    38 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us