Geodesics of Projections in Von Neumann Algebras

Geodesics of Projections in Von Neumann Algebras

Geodesics of projections in von Neumann algebras Esteban Andruchow∗ November 5, 2020 Abstract Let be a von Neumann algebra and A the manifold of projections in . There is a A P A natural linear connection in A, which in the finite dimensional case coincides with the the Levi-Civita connection of theP Grassmann manifold of Cn. In this paper we show that two projections p, q can be joined by a geodesic, which has minimal length (with respect to the metric given by the usual norm of ), if and only if A p q⊥ p⊥ q, ∧ ∼ ∧ where stands for the Murray-von Neumann equivalence of projections. It is shown that the minimal∼ geodesic is unique if and only if p q⊥ = p⊥ q =0. If is a finite factor, any ∧ ∧ A pair of projections in the same connected component of A (i.e., with the same trace) can be joined by a minimal geodesic. P We explore certain relations with Jones’ index theory for subfactors. For instance, it is −1 shown that if are II1 factors with finite index [ : ] = t , then the geodesic N ⊂M M N 1/2 distance d(eN ,eM) between the induced projections eN and eM is d(eN ,eM) = arccos(t ). 2010 MSC: 58B20, 46L10, 53C22 Keywords: Projections, geodesics of projections, von Neumann algebras, index for subfac- tors. arXiv:2011.02013v1 [math.OA] 3 Nov 2020 1 Introduction ∗ If is a C -algebra, let A denote the set of (selfadjoint) projections in . A has a rich A P A P geometric structure, see for instante the papers [12] by H. Porta and L.Recht and [6] by G. ∞ Corach, H. Porta and L. Recht. In these works, it was shown that A is a C complemented P submanifold of , the set of selfadjoint elements of , and has a natural linear connection, As A whose geodesics can be explicitly computed. A metric is introduced, called in this context a Finsler metric: since the tangent spaces of A are closed and complemented linear subspaces of P , they can be endowed with the norm metric. With this Finsler metric, Porta and Recht [12] As showed that two projections p,q A which satisfy that p q < 1 can be joined by a unique ∈ P k − k geodesic, which is minimal for the metric (i.e., it is shorter than any other smooth curve in A P joining the same endpoints). ∗Instituto Argentino de Matematica,´ ‘Alberto P. Calderon’,´ CONICET, Saavedra 15 3er. piso, (1083) Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, J.M. Gutierrez 1150 (1613), Los Polvorines, Argentina e-mail: [email protected] 1 In general, two projections p,q in satisfy that p q 1, so that what remains to consider A k − k≤ is what happens in the extremal case p q = 1: under what conditions does there exist a k − k geodesic, or a minimal geodesic, joining them. In the case when = ( ) the algebra of all bounded linear operators in a Hilbert space A B H , it is known (see for instance [4]) that there exists a geodesic joining p and q if and only if H dim R(p) N(q) = dim N(p) R(q). ∩ ∩ The geodesic is unique if and only if these intersections are trivial. The purpose of this note is to show that these facts remain valid if is a von Neumann A algebra, if we replace dim by the dimension relative to . Namely, it is shown that there exists A a minimal geodesic joining p and q in A, if and only if P p q⊥ p⊥ q. ∧ ∼ ∧ Here denotes the infimum of two projections, p⊥ = 1 p, and is the Murray-von Neumann ∧ − ∼ equivalence of projections. Also, it is shown that there exists a unique minimal geodesic if and only if p q⊥ =0= p⊥ q. ∧ ∧ We show that if is a finite factor, any pair of projections in in the same connected component A A of A (i.e., with the same trace), can be joined by a minimal geodesic. P In the final section of this paper, we explore the relationship with the index theory of von Neumann factors, introduced by V. Jones in [10]. A pairing of factors of type II , N ⊂ M 1 induces a sequence of projections, by means of the basic construction. We show that one recovers Jones index as a geodesic distance (minima of lengths of curves joining two given points): if e, f are two consecutive terms in the sequence of projections, then d(e, f) = arccos(t1/2), where t−1 = [ : ]. Also we show that if , with Jones’ projections e , e , M N N0 N1 ⊂ M 0 1 satisfy that e e < 1, then the unique geodesic δ(t) induces a smooth path of conditional k 0 − 1k expectations between and intermediate factors , and the parallel transport of this geodesic, M Nt induces a smooth path of normal -isomorphimsms between and . ∗ N0 Nt 2 Preliminaries The space A is sometimes called the Grassmann manifold of . The reason for this name is P A that in the case when = ( ), B H parametrizes the set of closed subspaces of : to each A B H P ( ) H closed subspace corresponds the orthogonal projection PS onto . Let us describe below S⊂H S the main features of the geometry of A in the general case. P 2.1 Homogeneous structure ∗ ∗ Denote by A = u : u u = uu = 1 the unitary group of . It is a Banach-Lie group, U { ∈ A } ∗ A whose Banach-Lie algebra is as = x : x = x . This group acts on A by means of ∗ A { ∈ A − } P u p = upu , u A, p A. The action is smooth and locally transitive. It is known (see · ∈ U ∈ P [12], [6]) that A is what in differential geometry is called a homogeneous space of the group P 2 A. The local structure of A is described using this action. For instance, the tangent space U P (T A) of A at p is given by (T A) = x : x = px + xp . P p P P p { ∈As } The isotropy subgroup of the action at p, i.e., the elements of A which fix a given p, is U = v A : vp = pv . The isotropy algebra I at p is its Banach-Lie algebra I = y : Ip { ∈U } p p { ∈Aas yp = py . } It is useful, in order to describe and understand the geometry of A, to consider the diagonal P / co-diagonal decomposition of in terms of a fixed projection p A. Elements x which A 0 ∈ P ∈A commute with p , or equivalently, commute with the symmetry 2p 1, when written as 2 2 in 0 0 − × terms of p , have diagonal matrices. Co-diagonal matrices correspond with elements in which 0 A anti-commute with 2p 1. 0 − Then, the isotropy subgroup and the isotropy algebra , I at p , are respectively the sets Ip0 p0 0 of diagonal unitaries and diagonal anti-Hermitian elements of . On the other side, the tangent A space (T A) is the set of diagonal selfadjoint elements of . P p0 A 2.2 Reductive structure Given an homogeneous space, a reductive structure is a smooth distribution p H , 7→ p ⊂ Aas p A, of supplements of Ip in as, which is invariant under the action of p. That is, a ∈ P A I ∗ distribution H of closed linear subspaces of verifying that H I = ; vH v = H for p Aas p ⊕ p Aas p p all v ; and the map p H is smooth. ∈Ip 7→ p In the case of A, the choice of the (so called) horizontal subspaces H is natural. The P p 0 z ⊥ horizontal H defined in [6] is H = ∗ : z p p , i.e., the set of co-diagonal p p { z 0 ∈ A } anti-Hermitian elements of − A As in classical differential geometry, a reductive structure on a homogeneous space defines a linear connection: if X(t) is a smooth curve of vectors tangent to a smooth curve p(t) in A, P i.e., a smooth curve of selfadjoint elements of , which are pointwise co-diagonal with respect A to p(t), then the covariant derivative of the linear connection is given by D X(t) := diagonal part w.r.t. p(t) of X˙ (t)= p(t)X˙ (t)p(t)+ p⊥(t)X˙ (t)p⊥(t). dt It is not difficult to deduce then that a geodesic starting at p A is given by the action of 0 ∈ P a one parameter group with horizontal (anti-Hermitian co-diagonal) velocity on p0 . Namely, 0 x given the base point p A, and a tangent vector x = ∗ (T A) 0 , the unique 0 ∈ P x 0 ∈ P p geodesic δ of A with δ(0) = p and δ˙(0) = x is given by P 0 tzx −tzx δ(t)= e p0e , 0 x where zx := ∗ − . The horizontal element zx is characterized as the unique horizontal x 0 element at p0 such that [zx,p0]= x. 2.3 Finsler metric As we mentioned above, one endows each tangent space (T A)p with the usual norm of . We P ∗A emphasize that this (constant) distribution of norms is not a Riemannian metric (the C -norm 3 is not given by an inner product), neither is it a Finsler metric in the classical sense (the map a a is non differentiable). Therefore the minimality result which we describe below does 7→ k k not follow from general considerations. It was proved in [12] using ad-hoc techniques.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us