Linear Differential Equations and Functions of Operators

Linear Differential Equations and Functions of Operators

Linear differential equations and functions of operators Andreas Ros´en (formerly Axelsson) Link¨opingUniversity February 2011 Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 1 / 26 The simplest example 7 −9 Given initial data x(0) 2 C2 and coefficient matrix A := , solve 3 −5 the linear system of first order ODEs x0(t) + Ax(t) = 0 for x : R ! C2: 3 1 Coordinates in eigenbasis y(t) := V −1x(t), where V := , give 1 1 decoupled equations 4 0 y 0(t) + y(t) = 0 for y : R ! C2: 0 −2 e−4t 0 Solution to the initial ODE is x(t) = V V −1x(0): 0 e2t Definition 4 0 e−4t 0 A = V V −1 gives e−tA := V V −1. 0 −2 0 e2t Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 2 / 26 Functional calculus through diagonalization of matrices A generic matrix A 2 Cn×n is diagonalizable, −1 A = V diag(λ1; : : : ; λn) V ; for some invertible \change-of-basis" matrix V 2 Cn×n. Definition For a function φ : σ(A) = fλ1; : : : ; λng ! C defined on the spectrum of A, define the matrix −1 φ(A) := V diag φ(λ1); : : : ; φ(λn) V For fixed A, the map φ 7! φ(A) from symbol φ : σ(A) ! C to matrix φ(A) 2 Cn×n is an algebra-homomorphism: (φψ)(A) = φ(A) (A): −tA −tA −sA −(t+s)A Example: fe gt2R is a group of matrices, e e = e . Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 3 / 26 1 Functions of matrices 2 Functions of linear Hilbert space operators 3 Spectral projections and the Kato conjecture 4 Operational calculus and maximal regularity Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 4 / 26 Functional calculus for general matrices For general A 2 Cn×n there are natural definitions of matrices A2; A3; A4;:::; (λI − A)−1; λ2 = σ(A): We want to define in a natural way a matrix φ(A) for any φ 2 H(σ(A)) := fφ :Ω ! C holomorphic ;Ω ⊃ σ(A) openg: Definition For a function φ 2 H(σ(A)), define the matrix 1 Z φ(A) := φ(λ)(λI − A)−1dλ, 2πi γ where γ is a closed curve in Ω counter clockwise around σ(A). The holomorphic functional calculus of A is the map H(σ(A)) 3 φ 7! φ(A) 2 Cn×n. Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 5 / 26 Properties of the holomorphic functional calculus 1 The holomorphic functional calculus of A is an algebra-homomorphism and its range is a commutative subalgebra of Cn×n: φ(A) (A) = (φψ)(A) = ( φ)(A) = (A)φ(A): 2 For polynomials we have (zk )(A) = Ak ; for k = 0; 1; 2;::: 3 If H(σ(A)) 3 φk ! φ uniformly on compact subsets of Ω, then φk (A) ! φ(A). 4 For diagonal matrices we have φ diag(λ1; : : : ; λn) = diag(φ(λ1); : : : ; φ(λn)): 5 For any invertible \change-of-basis" matrix V , we have φ(VAV −1) = V φ(A)V −1. Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 6 / 26 Example: a Jordan block Fix a 2 C and consider A = aI + N, where N is nilpotent: Nm = 0 for some m. Spectrum is σ(A) = fag and m−1 1 1 1 X Nk = = : λI − (aI + N) λ − a I − N=(λ − a) (λ − a)k+1 k=0 Cauchy's formula for derivatives gives m−1 m−1 X 1 Z φ(λ) X φ(k)(a) φ(A) = dλ Nk = Nk : 2πi (λ − a)k+1 k! k=0 γ k=0 For example 02 31 2 0 1 00 1 (3) 3 3100 φ(3) φ (3) 2 φ (3) 6 φ (3) B60 310 7C 6 0 φ(3) φ0(3) 1 φ00(3) 7 φ B6 7C = 6 2 7 : @40 0 31 5A 4 0 0 φ(3) φ0(3) 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 φ(3) Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 7 / 26 Generalization to bounded operators on Hilbert spaces Letting n ! 1, we extend the above holomorphic functional calculus from matrices A 2 Cn×n; to bounded linear operators T : H!H on Hilbert space H (or more generally to Banach space operators). The Dunford (or Riesz{Dunford or Dunford{Taylor) integral 1 Z φ(T ) := φ(λ)(λI − T )−1dλ 2πi γ defines a bounded linear operator φ(T ): H!H. Spectrum σ(T ) ⊂ C is compact (but typically not finite). Symbol φ :Ω ! C is holomorphic on open neighbourhood Ω ⊃ σ(T ). Closed curve γ ⊂ Ω encircles σ(T ) counter clockwise. Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 8 / 26 Example: self-adjoint operators Let T : H!H be self-adjoint: hTf ; gi = hf ; Tgi, f ; g 2 H. The spectral theorem shows −1 T = VMλV ; where V : L2(X ; dµ) !H is a bijective isometry, with a Borel measure dµ on a σ-compact space X , and Mλ : L2(X ; dµ) ! L2(X ; dµ) is multiplication by a real-valued function λ 2 L1(X ; dµ): (Mλf )(x) := λ(x)f (x) for f 2 L2(X ; dµ) and a.e. x 2 X . Then 1 the spectrum σ(T ) ⊂ R is the essential range of λ : X ! R, and 2 φ(T ) is similar to multiplication by φ(λ(x)), or more precisely −1 φ(T ) = VMφ◦λV : Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 9 / 26 A boundedness conjecture Even though φ is assumed to be holomorphic on a neighbourhood of σ(T ) in the definition of φ(T ), it is natural to ask whether φ(T ) only depends on φjσ(T ) ? Do we have the estimate kφ(T )kH!H ≤ sup jφ(λ)j ? λ2σ(T ) For self-adjoint operators we have kT kH!H = kMφ◦λkL2!L2 = sup jφ(λ)j: λ2σ(T ) Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 10 / 26 The conjecture is false! The estimate kφ(T )kH!H ≤ sup jφ(λ)j λ2σ(T ) cannot be true for general non-selfadjoint operators, since changing to an equivalent norm on H may change the RHS, but not the LHS (not σ(T )!). Example 0 1 A simple counter example is A = : We have A2 = 0, so 0 0 σ(A) = f0g. However, φ(0) φ0(0) A = : 0 φ(0) We cannot bound A (φ(0) and φ0(0)) by φ(0), uniformly in φ. Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 11 / 26 A classical positive result The estimate kφ(T )kH!H ≤ sup jφ(λ)j λ2σ(T ) holds if we replace the spectrum σ(T ) in the RHS by the disk fjλj ≤ kT kg⊃ σ(T ): The following is a classical result by J. von Neumann (Eine Spektraltheorie f¨urallgemeine Operatoren eines unit¨arenRaumes. Math. Nachr., 1951). Theorem (von Neumann) Let T : H!H be a bounded linear operator on a Hilbert space H. Then kφ(T )kH!H ≤ sup jφ(λ)j jλ|≤kT k holds for all φ holomorphic on some neighbourhood of jλj ≤ kT k. Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 12 / 26 A sharpening of von Neumann's theorem M. Crouzeix (Numerical range and functional calculus in Hilbert space. J. Funct. Anal., 2007) has proved the following. Theorem (Crouzeix) Let W (T ) := fhTf ; f i ; kf k = 1g be the numerical range of a linear Hilbert space operator T : H!H. Then kφ(T )kH!H ≤ 11:08 supλ2W (T ) jφ(λ)j holds uniformly for all φ holomorphic on some neighbourhood of W (T ). Hausdorff–Toeplitz theorem: W (T ) is a convex set. σ(T ) ⊂ W (T ) ⊂ fjλj ≤ kT kg The second inclusion quite sharp: kT k ≤ 2 supfjλj ; λ 2 W (T )g. For a normal( A∗A = AA∗) matrix A, W (A) is the convex hull of σ(A). Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 13 / 26 Spectral projections: a simple example Often one needs to apply φ which are not holomorphic on a convex neigbourhood of σ(T ) (like W (T )). Example 23 0 03 Let A := 40 7 15, so that σ(A) = f3; 7g (algebraic multiplicity 2 for 0 0 7 ( 20 0 03 0; jλ − 3j < 1; λ = 7). For φ(λ) = we have φ(A) := 4010 5 being 1; jλ − 7j < 1; 0 01 the spectral projection onto the two-dimensional generalized eigenspace at λ = 7. Von Neumann's and Crouzeix's theorems do not apply, but still kφ(A)k ≤ C supfjφ(λ)j ; jλ − 3j < 1 or jλ − 7j < 1g is clear from the Dunford integral! Andreas Ros´en (Link¨opingUniversity) Diff. equations & functions of operators February 2011 14 / 26 Partial differential equations (PDEs) Applications to PDEs typically involves functional calculus of unbounded n differential operators D on a space like H = L2(R ) (rather than bounded operators T ). Pn 2 Consider the positive Laplace operator −∆ = − 1 @k ; with spectrum σ(−∆) = R+. The heat equation @t ft − ∆ft = 0 has solution −t(−∆) ft = e f0; t > 0: 2 The wave equation @t ft − ∆ft = 0 has solution p p sin(t −∆) ft = cos(t −∆)f0 + p (@t f )0; t 2 R: −∆ n For functions ft (x) = f (t; x) we write x 2 R for the space variable and t for the time/evolution variable.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    26 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us