Parallel Strand Lumber (PSL) –Parallam™ • Laminated Strand Lumber (LSL) – Timberstrand™ • I-Joists (I-Beams) – Masonitebalken™, TJI™ Examples

Parallel Strand Lumber (PSL) –Parallam™ • Laminated Strand Lumber (LSL) – Timberstrand™ • I-Joists (I-Beams) – Masonitebalken™, TJI™ Examples

Engineered Wood Products for Structural Purposes Charlotte Bengtsson SP Trätek Växjö University Contents • General about EWP •Productioncontrol • Overview over EWPs •New developments EWP definition • EWP are made from ”pieces” of timber which are arranged or formed for structural purposes. Bonding with adhesives or heat and pressure. • General concept Cut in smaller pieces and re-assemble (reducing defects) Tailor-made structural members •Resulting products more homogeneous less variability (less orthotropic) EWP - general • Overcoming weaknesses of solid wood • Taking advantage of low-quality raw material • Structural members of “any size” • Less variability in material properties – higher design strength Diff. in design value Diff. in mean value Number of beams Strength EWP - general • Strong • Large interval of spans • Made with durable adhesives • Dimensionally stable – Made from dry material Structural Timber Strength [MPa] C24 24 C30 30 Glulam GL32 32 GL36 36 LVL 40-50 EWP - general • Accurate production control is required • Sometimes, 3rd party surveillance is required • Development of Plywood started beginning of 20 century • Glulam was developed early 19th century – C.F. Wiebking (1762-1842) Examples • Glued-laminated timber (glulam) • Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) – Kerto™, Microllam™ • Parallel Strand Lumber (PSL) –Parallam™ • Laminated Strand Lumber (LSL) – TimberStrand™ • I-Joists (I-beams) – Masonitebalken™, TJI™ Examples • Oriented Strand Board (OSB) • Plywood • High Density Fibre Board (HDF) –Masonite™ •Particleboard Production control of EWP • Optimised products • Sensible to production errors •Productioncontrol – Quality system – Internal control –Externalaudits • Certification – CE-marking Production control of EWP • Quality system according to a standard –Production place • Ex. requirement on moisture and temperature –Production methods • Description, instructions –Equipment • Description, maintenance –Internal quality control • Visual control • Random control (ex strength) Production control of EWP • External control/audit – Carried out by inspection body – Unannounced visits – Control of the internal quality system (production place, journals etc…) – Sampling for tests by an approved laboratory –Testing Certification and marking • Requirements on products and production are given in a standard • A notified body checks that the requirements are fulfilled • The notified body issues the right to mark the product (CE- marking) • Ex of products that can be CE-marked –Glulam –Panelproducts – I-beams – Stuctural timber Glulam •Low variability in properties •Arbitrary size •Shape stability •Otpimised use of material •Arbitrary shape Manufacturing of glulam • Laminations (spruce) – 40-50 mm thickness (curved: 20-30 mm) – 1.5-5.0 m length –Dry timber (12-15 %MC) – Machine stress graded – Finger joints –Cut to size – Planing Manufacturing of glulam •Beams – Laminations to form cross-section – Apply adhesive, pressure, heat, curing – Planing •Adhesives –PRF, MUF, PUR •Shapesand sizes – Prismatic, curved, single and double tapered – Pot life of adhesives, transport Manufacturing of glulam • High degree of added value •Industrialisedprocess • Stress graded timber (C, L, LS or LD-grades) • Quality control – Finger joints – Delamination of glulam • CE-marking in Europe according to harmonised standard EN 14080 Glulam - characteristics • Lamination effect – Beam bending strength superior to lamination tensile strength • Large beams (deep) – Nominal strength decrease with increasing size (size factor) • Influence of finger joints – 50-75 % of failures in finger joints Glulam - inspiration Parallel Strand Lumber (PSL) • Common in Canada and US • 1986 • Large strands cut from veneers • Defect removal – adhesive – assembly – pressure and curing -trimming –ripping –end product • High density • Characteristic surface • Used for large and small members • Possible to treat with preservatives due to voids in the structure • Fire: comparable to sawn timber PSL - examples Laminated Strand Lumber (LSL) • Common in Canada and US • Early 1990 • Small strands (waste or from fastgrown trees) • Drying of strands – addition of resins – blending – forming - press – sanding - cutting • High density • Characteristic surface • Used for wood framing LSL - examples LVL • Thin veneers (3-5 mm) • Introduced around 1955 • Drying – grading of veneers – adhesive application – hot pressing – trimming – cutting – grading –end product • Same fibre orientation in (almost) all layers • Used for structural framing, I-joist flanges, scaffolding… LVL (KERTO) LVL I-joists • Introduced 1970 •Lowweight •Lowvariabilityin properties •Reliable products • Accurate dimensions • Dimensional stability • ”Squeak-free” floors • Solid wood/LVL flanges • HDF/OSB/Plywood web • Replacing large dimension solid timber I-joists - manufacture • Strength grading of timber, by machine with visual complement (flange) • Fingerjointing to desired length (flange) • Cutting of groove (flange) • Jointing and cutting of tongue for the webmaterial • Jointing of flanges and web to a beam I-joists - manufacture • Manufacturing varies between mills • Strength grading, then cutting • Orientation of the flange Experiences from testing I-joists Failure modes • Tension failure at knot or fingerjoint • Buckling of upper flange • Shear failure very seldom Evaluation - E • Evaluation of E in three different ways • Mid-span deflection, curvature and density of the flanges 1 . 577 E = ρ0 , 12 Variation in beam properties •Data from SP´s quality control (data from 350 I-joists) •Two classes, mentioned ”Class 1” and ”Class 2” Emidspan Ecurvature Edensity Quality Mean Cov Mean Cov Mean Cov [MPa] [%] [MPa] [%] [MPa] [%] Class 1 12500 11 12440 12 12920 9 Class 2 13440 7 13420 8 13780 8 (Requirements 11000 and 13000 MPa) Variation in beam properties Bending Total Depth Flange depth strength Quality 5th Cov Mean Cov Mean Cov perc. [%] [mm] [%] [mm] [%] [MPa] Class 1 26.1 16 299.5 0.2 46.8 1.4 Class 2 30.2 15 249.7 0.2 46.9 1.1 (Requirements 22 and 27 MPa) COV in bending strength for machine strength grading is normally around 20 %. I-joists •New plant (Masonite beams) opened some weeks ago in Rundvik •CE-marking possible by ETA Oriented Strand Board - OSB • Introduced 1970 • Flakes and adhesive formed under heat and pressure to structural panels • Three orthogonal layers • Outer layers parallell to the long axis of the panel, inner layer perpendicular or randomly aligned • Careful production control is required to control the quality Developments • Cross laminated timber • Composites (wood-plastic, alternatives) • Question of formaldehyde emissions (new tough requirements) •??.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    36 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us