Efficacy of Insecticides Against Major Defoliators of Rice

Efficacy of Insecticides Against Major Defoliators of Rice

Indian Journal of Entomology 83(2021) Online published Ref. No. e20228 DoI No.: 10.5958/0974-8172.2021.00024.9 EFFICACY OF INSECTICIDES AGAINST MAJOR DEFOLIATORS OF RICE SANDEEP KUMAR* AND KULDEEP SHARMA Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, V C Farm, Mandya, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru 571405 *Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) ABSTRACT A field experiment carried out at the College of Agriculture, V C Farm, Mandya, Karnataka evaluated the efficacy of insecticides viz., indoxacarb 15.8EC @ 0.5 ml/ l, flubendiamide 48SC @ 0.15 ml/ l, chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC @ 0.12 ml/ l, benfuracarb 3G @ 33 kg/ ha, cartap hydrochloride 4G @ 25 kg/ ha, fipronil 0.3G @ 25 kg/ ha, acephate 75SP @ 1g/ l and chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 2ml/ l against major defoliators of rice viz., rice hispa, leaf folder, caseworm and horned caterpillar during kharif, 2018. The reduction of leaf damage over untreated control after imposing treatments was maximum with flubendiamide 48SC (56.99-82.72%) followed by cartap hydrochloride 4 G (52.24- 79.69%). Also, flubendiamide 48SC @0.15 ml/ l was the most effective with maximum cost benefit ratio. Key words: Rice, defoliators, insecticides, efficacy, flubendiamide, cartap hydrochloride, indoxacarb, chlorantraniliprole, benfuracarb, fipronil, acephate, chlorpyriphos, cost benefits Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important include: indoxacarb 15.8EC @0.5 ml/ l, flubendiamide cereal crops of the world, and its productivity is 48SC @0.15 ml/ l, chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC @0.12 hampered by insect pests. Amongst these the defoliators ml/ l, benfuracarb 3G @33 kg/ ha, cartap hydrochloride viz., rice hispa, Dicladispa armigera Oliver, leaf 4G @ 25 kg/ ha, fipronil 0.3G @ 25 kg/ ha, acephate folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee, caseworm 75SP @1g/ l, chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 2ml/ l and untreated Nymphula depunctalis Guenee and horned caterpillar control. The variety Jaya was sown with a spacing of 20x Melanitis leda ismene Cramer are of major importance 15 cm, in plot size of 4x 4.5 m with a total of 108 subplots. and cause economic damage (Sidde Gowda and The evaluated insecticides were used as soil application/ Gubbaiah, 2011; Bhattacharjee and Ray, 2010; Ahmad foliar spray, with granular insecticides being benfuracarb, et al., 2010; Alvi et al., 2003; Singh and Singh, 2014; cartap hydrochloride, fipronil applied seven days Pathak and Khan, 1994). Of these, the rice horned before those applied as foliar spray. The pretreatment caterpillar usually occurs in less number and infest rice observations were made a day before treatment, and crops of lowland and upland. This pest has gained major the post treatment counts at 1, 7 and 14 days after. For pest status in various parts of India. In Southern parts rice hispa counts were made on 10 randomly selected of Karnataka, the infestation of all these defoliators plants/ replication by counting number of leaves showing have become serious for the past two decades causing feeding damage by adults (white parallel streaks along heavy damage in both kharif and summer crops. Since, leaf axis) and total number of leaves, and % leaf damage the southern parts of Karnataka are important rice computed. For rice leaf folder it was computed with the growing region in the state, the management of these number of folded leaves (scrapping on leaf blade). In case defoliators are of prime importance. The present study of rice caseworm, it was done with number of leaf cases, evaluates the efficacy of some insecticides against the and for horned caterpillar it was done with the damaged major defoliators. leaves (defoliated leaf blade irregularly) (IRRI, 2013). At harvest, yield of grain and biomass were recorded, with MATERIALS AND METHODS data converted to q/ ha. The data of % leaf damage was The field experiment was carried out in kharif, subjected to suitable transformation before ANOVA and 2018 at the College of Agriculture, V C Farm, Mandya, means were separated by Tukey’s HSD (Tukey, 1953). Karnataka (12032’N, 76053’E, 690 masl) during kharif, Further, cost economics was worked out by following 2018. l. For each defoliator, separate experiment was formula. laid out in Randomized Completely Block Design with Benefit Cost Ratio = (Net profit (Rs.) three replications in each treatment. The treatments (Total cost (Rs.) 2 Indian Journal of Entomology 83(2021) Online published Ref. No. e20228 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION against rice leaf folder. Similarly, Javaregowda and Naik (2005) and Kulagod et al. (2011) also indicated The results revealed that with D. armigera, the that flubendiamide 39.35SC was the best against rice pretreatment data varied from 2.03 to 2.41%, and 2.02 defoliators. Similarly, Seetharamu et al. (2005) and to 2.39 on one day after treatment (DAT); seven DAT Sachan et al. (2006) revealed the superiority of cartap least damage (1.61%) was observed with acephate 75SP hydrochloride against lepidopteran pests of rice. Thus, which was on par with that of flubendiamide 48SC flubendiamide 48SC @ 0.15 ml/ l was found to be the (1.67%) and cartap hydrochloride 4G (1.72%); on 14 most effective insecticides against defoliators of rice DAT 1.13% damage was observed with flubendiamide followed by cartap hydrochloride 4G @ 25 kg/ ha. 48SC which was on par with cartap hydrochloride 4G However, the flubendiamide 48SC @ 0.15 ml/ l and (1.33%). Thus, reduction of damage at 14 DAT was more indoxacarb 15.8 EC @ 0.5 ml/ l gave maximum cost in flubendiamide 48SC (59.78%). Maximum grain yield benefit. (61.12 q/ ha) was obtained with flubendiamide 48SC followed by cartap hydrochloride 4G (57.22 q/ha). The ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS maximum cost benefit was 1:3.07 with flubendiamide 48SC. For C. medinalis, the pretreatment observations The authors thank the Department of Agricultural revealed 9.70 to 10.92% damage, and 1 DAT, it was Entomology, College of Agriculture, Mandya, 9.62 to 10.34%, with significant differences observed University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru for 7DAT- the least damage (6.09%) was observed in providing necessary facilities. The award of ICAR-NTS flubendiamide 48SC followed by cartap hydrochloride 4 (National talent scholarship) to the first author is also G (6.43%) against 13.97% in untreated control. After 14 acknowledged. DAT similar results were obtained with flubendiamide REFERENCES 48SC which was on par with cartap hydrochloride 4G, with maximum reduction of 82.72% in damage over Ahmad H, Khan R B, Sharma D, Jamwal V V S, Gupta S. 2010. Seasonal incidence, infestation and trap catches of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis untreated control. Maximum yield of 66.47 q/ ha was in rice. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 18(2): 380-383. observed with flubendiamide 48SC giving cost benefit Alvi S M, Ali M A, Chaudhary S, Iqbal S. 2003. Population trends and being 1:3.15 (Table 1, 2). chemical control of rice leaf folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis on rice crop. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 5(4): Against N. depunctalis which was showing a 615-617. pretreatment damage at 9.79 to 10.66%, and 9.75 Bhattacharjee P P, Ray D C. 2010. Population dynamics of rice hispa, to 10.58% on 1 DAT, revealed damage of 5.60% Dicladispa armigera (Olivier) in Barak Valley of Assam and effectiveness of bio-pesticides for its management. Oryza 47: on 7 DAT with flubendiamide 48SC; and it was on 307-311. par with cartap hydrochloride 4G; on 14 DAT again Chaudhari B N, Shamkuwar G R, Raut R F, Shende P V, Undirwade flubendiamide 48SC was the most effective on par D B, Katti G R. 2017. Screening of newer insecticides against with cartap hydrochloride 4G, leading to 74.94% and major insect pests of rice. International Journal of Researches in 71.91% reduction in damage, respectively. Maximum Biosciences Agriculture and Technology 5(2): 506-509. yield (59.83 q/ha) was observed with flubendiamide Devi P R, Singh K L. 2015. Efficacy of new molecules, spinosad and monocrotophos on the incidence of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis 48SC giving maximum benefit cost ratio (1:3.00). In Guenee under kharif rice crop ecosystem of Manipur Valley. the experiment on M. leda ismene, pretreatment damage International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology was from 6.19 to 6.53% and after 1 DAT it was 6.10 to 6(1): 8-14. 6.68%. After 7 DAT this daamge reduced to the least IRRI. 2013. Standard Evaluation System (SES) for rice. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines. value of 5.58% with cartap hydrochloride 4G which was Javaregowda, Krishna Naik. 2005. Bioefficacy of flubendiamide 20 on par with others; and after 14 DAT it reduced to 3.26% WDG (RIL-038) against paddy pests and their natural enemies. with flubendiamide leading to a reduction of 56.99%. Pestology 29(11): 58-60. Maximum yield (60.36 q/ ha) was obtained with Kulagod S D, Mahabaleshwar H, Vastrad A S, Basavanagoud K. 2011. flubendiamide 48SC followed by cartap hydrochloride Evaluation of insecticides and biorationals against yellow stem 4G, with benefit cost ratio of 1:3.02 (Table 1,2). borer and leaf folder on rice crop. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24(2): 244-246. These results are in close conformity with those Pathak M D, Khan Z R. 1994. Insect pests of rice. International Journal of Devi and Singh (2015), Sandhu and Dhaliwal of Tropical Insect Science 35(2): 51-53. Sachan S K, Singh D V, Chowdary A S. 2006. Field evaluation of (2016) and Chaudhari et al. (2017) who observed insecticides against rice stem borer and leaf folder. Annals of Plant that flubendiamide 39.35SC was the most effective Protection Sciences 14(2): 462-464. Table 1. Effect of insecticides against defoliators in rice D.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us