ANNELI MIHKETEV IMITATION in the POETIC TFXT It

ANNELI MIHKETEV IMITATION in the POETIC TFXT It

ANNELI MIHKETEV IMITATION IN THE POETIC TFXT has contrccted d:iffc'rent , r , Ll , rl i()lt is an old inter-semiotic phcnomenon which arrd diffcreni works of art, so wc may say th.rt , . rl |t,li6d5, diffcrent cultures ,,,,r ,lr,)il is a cr-rltural crossroacls in a diffcrent sense. Althor'r[5h imiti'rtion can ,, , r rregi,rtive mcanings, for cxample plagiarisrn, copying or counterfciting, it ,l (,,il] activc hurnan mot'lelling pr()ccss which htrs generated and coutit]ut-s , r('ratc variegated ancl changing ctrltttrtrl fonns I6, 128l' lt!'roots of thc treatmcnts of in-ritation c'xtend ttl anticluity and are key cle- alsrr ,,, r,1,, itr P1.rto',s and Aristotic's work. As we know, thc- tcrm'imittltion'is ,rrrr|t.tecl with thc term 'mimc'sis" r,r4rich was used by both philosophcrs. There ,r, t\\,o types of mimesis according to Plakr: the first rcPresents the physical 7, 2lJ2-3101' r,1, , ts artistically, and the sccond rcPrcsents thc'ideas inwardly lscc the , , ,,r.ding kr Plakr's paradoxic.rl opit-lio11 tl-rc artist who crc'ates imitations of somc. kind of decciver: "lmitation, then, is far from 1 trr,,ical objccts seems to be attacks 1,,. l[rth, and apparcntly it manages to rnake all things just because-'it ,,,,1r a small parrt of each, and that an irnagc' Thc painter, for exampie' will paint he has ncr r .. rVC safz a shocmakcr, a ctrrpentcr, aucl all other workmen, though L,,,ivlecigc whatcver of their crafts. But ncvertheless, if he is a good Paintcr, he chil- il,rV ptliltt a carpenter and show thc thing at some distatlce, trnd so cheat ,lr,,rr .rnd stupid mcn into thinking it is rcally a carPenter" [ibid., 286]. Plakn's antl ctrnst't1ut'Irtly art rr li'.r waS that trll re'Prcscntec'l things are already irnitatiotts, L l.rr from knowlcclge. Or as Worton and Still havc written: "ln the case of l,l,rtonic imitation, the 'poet'always copics an earlier act of cteation, which is itlera of rr.;clf alrcacly a copy" [12,31. So, an artist rcPresents orrly thc copy of the tlu' object, i.e. art is a double lie. Aristotle belicves that mimcs'is is governed by thc rtrlcs of its form raih€rl than differ i,v the accuracy with which it represents the object: he means that thc arts vcry rn the methocls through which they creatc imitations. Threc Phenomena ale the llr-rp()rtant for Aristotle, whcn he speaks of imitation: "those of thc mcans, n= )62 KULTURAS KRUSTPUNKI.I 2. ]aiL]ICilS I-I MIKIIEL!]V. IMIIATION IN THF] POE'IIC TEXl' 163 s b1 imitation tn lmrtate' Aristotle11, jl,,ff uy wrwIrICll' ri ch, whatwha t andan ,', ,,lrrctriiy thcre are different modcs and purposes for :T,ilT""--stresses: "To imitate*::. ::i::ord d r..,,,,,,hor't' llrt'l r,,l AII'T]:;l: ,"rirr.,], e ln man from Genctte strcsses thc rencwable energy of imita- men, likewise. nafrlr^ilr,.o-,-:-.^ " his infarrr't. t I ,, 1, r{ .)t difterent ttmes. -^, - of *ll#"J"|#'.T::T1J#:xi::*,."'tilili'.,TlTil,:il:':,Til,,l ,, ,,,,1 llte aspects of in'u'ention trncf imitatiorr in the pre'-modern sense : i'll iliTl ",',: "the discovery of arppropriate material to imitatc' Hil ll; Tli'ff : ,, L,,lr lsee 4,73-751, i.c. :',i:l 1 ilH::l',Tll ll"':::'ll ii,t"*' : : (for ' ----'-'"'-l' rtruluLiy ano rhythm yet in accordance with pre-dispose'd ,':'.":,'ll::iliilii'i,'#:*:y;ii:#;:l':T;'xl';ii'#l1llj'llil:as to metre, it is plai. ' being also nirtrrr,r ,rl,r rrr,tteriai is the'u trrrtrnged ancl'r', thosep"..o,',tnose two polcs are in contact in imrta- rraryIrally tlreserrrese o;o;,,;;;Y":.:i,::'::":::Ythm),propensiiies ;,;- Persons ui*r,n-",,,,,,,in whom .rrgr , ,,r,, 1,'r'S (tlispttsitio)" t6, 1081. [t seems the extemporaneousrxremporaneous -"* ";*::._::':.','""'':ttr ni:turallytl'ltural]y attempfcartemDrs ::,:ti"r^,r.j-r- .:jl:'lt::t.-- .were ledleci toro ruclt,rucrt, ,rr'l,rr '.tIr.'staticanclclynamicorthe.olc]arrdtht:rrew.Thectlntactbctwccn --"r'"' "vtttcrr' Hrddltally improvecl, thc'older I1bid.,226l. gave birth to prx,trr , t\\,{) poles also creartcs a tension betwecn old t-rnd new lt seems in the new agree rt'itrr Mary ,.', I lr,rs a static and balancing function, although it is changcd .I orr's opinion that, arthougrr prat.nic and Aristotelia. rlr, tl-hatbalancingirnclstaticftrncticlnptonrtlte.srecognition.I'dlikctcl :;il" ag, ,, 1r,rlt' this theorctlcal stattlment through Estonian poet Kristian Jaak uatesiiF:::ffffi":t7J::;iln5i*;;l :onlcr or:r",ro";; Aristotc'lian art respcctivc-ly as forn thlr5 ,,11 r r, | .(rn/s Poems. either an illusio' an tmitati.n Mimetic valrre is clicrr.torrrous, .f nature" 16, ,tr'l t; t;;;;r ancl false clependsnotoninnatt :*". "...because minrr,r,r: -l gth """;;;"-.-,;]-ill:" ', ,1(,rsol1 of thc century. He was born or qua, iryi ng u,,,,,, | wrote his poems at the beginning I {r^-".i.i,y, Hc are rheref.re ";il;ff::T:': il.:l,::l,llll ::i::"morntnt... (..) All crrlttrral ,, tr|t,r 1E01 anc'l hc was only 21 ycars old when hc diccl in 1822in ltiga in the rhrall of imitation,s;;i: for.rrn in Rlgn ("Kristiani Petcrsoni ,;i pr r,,t('only two collelctions of poc'ms: Sorrgs lr Jagc'r a to a n d o'-,,i* i,.ol ] laulud' :[T :i ?:llfi ::ifil r,rrlrrLl. Rialinnas", 1Blft) and Sorr,qs in'fttrtrt ("Kristiani Jago l)etersoni lff "; :illi: I ; I "Hf :,,' -l819"), lrrtrrlirtttt-ts, as wcll as some poems in German, which were publishcd ::**n;i',.,:*i;"-'1"iJ.:*'T:11ff il:iltilIif ,llrLrmously. "'i',tT,'.:',::ffi *:l: 1,, ' jffi lrnitation is a vcry important phenomcnon in Pcterson's ptlctic style. 5]il::t".fi than influence' as his m:l*ii::i*,:"JrF,i!:;{ I trlli'rc'flt preclccelssors infh-renced him. In fact, it was more thlluqh Iiteraryimitation: * il*iu:;l influence textuality' r.ro, )lP aitho,grr the term ,int.r, (.r.ics oftcn imitatecl the preclccessors'styles. Although imitation ancl the 1960s' the pl-renomenon perhaps "ri.r"a is , r in sclme ways, we c.ln still perceive the as oltl i' fact much I I ( connectecl and somctimes also simila as ,-'r-llo1societ)z and 'rt,rl. oldt,r, believe culturc Isee also l'erh;rps T.S. Eliot capturcd the essence tlrat inter-tex,tan rel;rtions *.rri,,r]ncr stirl ,lrilcrences betwec.n thc two phenomc.na. are characteristic greatness trf texts [ibid.]. aorl.".nr,-,t'ut of all cliscotrrses aborrl ,,t the cliffcrence clultc preciscly: ""'Poet of the slrPrL'me imitation' they write that "Every ,,,pptr.,rr,''j-ii;,:ilrt iiterary imitarion js ',lr.rkespcare can hardly iufluence, he can onlv be imitatecl: and thc differcnce ancl suppian,t ir tr.ns the original tl-rat cau fc'cundate, whereas imita- at times for,"r,.....t^orllTplete oio ruir.r-, r.rr-'. I ,,,i\veen influence ancl imitation is influencc 'origina' (..) Beside's, imitation j..:, r i rron - especially ur-rconscious irnitation - can oniy stcrilize. force :':: "".;;;;;;";',:;;,1:. ;f,Tfi:;:,n",l* lrerary_and socielinguistic",.i,,",,. oftcn bc profitable becausc we cannot st-tc- at the time .f i. *,,r_,.;.:l cocles in , rl a writer in a foreign languagc can - , i'cd" [2, 181. *,:.lll,;.''".i:tiii"il:;l'*:.T:*:;1j[.[:11*l*tsocrolects jl in an imitativc. text ConcerningKristianJaakl,ete.rsorr'spoetry,wecanseethatEliot,swtlrds libid.l. O, ,n..,o^" timc., the alnclcnt the,_rr"r,n,.',, ,ot ,rrc ;rt least partially applicable. of course, Peterson's moclels were or in terp reta t,.* or_,ty *it.i d epend s on trre etc. and thcre is morc imitirtion than influ- il'JXl'i},:::Ji:11",,il' tplies wriri n g ancl llreats, Pindar, Vcrgil, Anacrcon a'd depc.ds upon a time" tl-rere Iibid., 6J. p.o""r, ;;;;;;;-.;r."" t,nce that connects the ancient poets ancl Pcterson. But at thc samc and is imitation in the foreign lernguages (antique languages and Ccrman)' K U I-'f U RA S I(R 1b5 U STI'U N K I"1 I I i MIKIIFLEV. IMIl'AI'I(]N IN TIJE POF'IIC]'IF'X1' the resnlt of peterson,s . imitation is n r somett I t t' tl e r a c p r tt c m i a r o n t ttt discovered \1 t J ttc t n r u tr f ancl became uncr erstandabr",. nl'lliliT"uo"J,-*iffl llts tttisctttt sttparis: ne gt:lidunt rtcnttts ning of the 20th cerltllry. petc'rson I ;l ;' i r broke t t1 tr I t'zt c s c u r t r S tt t t1 r s cln i ground r n tr rt c for innovati.rr, N 1 t u p h r natio.al poetry, but trrose innovations 'ew rrr were rearized only in the 20th '',tct't'trrrrtt yoPulo ( .) d,ring the intermetriate c(,.rrrI years in the 19th century he was forgotten. Peterson imitated Altrr.rrgrt great and we,-kr-rown preclecessors, irr*r'r his work was n.r rr,r,rl q;rilri ;i ttrr I ttt i,i; , ti/llrtt. i' known to Estonian readers during rris rrre, a'd although :it['!ittti iLtttr ,irltt0 ,'r't litt Cerman, """"".'rr herrL' wrotewroL( ars, rrr lt't lris innovationq u/prp rn,r'rr-.-^.. -__';.. Llortrt. Oc1. l, I [5, 33] rea d e r sh i p *r, i . n.l iJ L6; i:! ; :: iil j; "r.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us