Gone with the Wind: Sequencing Its Type Species Supports Inclusion of Cryptolechia in Gyalecta (Ostropales: Gyalectaceae)

Gone with the Wind: Sequencing Its Type Species Supports Inclusion of Cryptolechia in Gyalecta (Ostropales: Gyalectaceae)

The Lichenologist 51(4): 287–299 (2019) © British Lichen Society, 2019 doi:10.1017/S0024282919000240 Gone with the wind: sequencing its type species supports inclusion of Cryptolechia in Gyalecta (Ostropales: Gyalectaceae) Robert LÜCKING , Bibiana MONCADA and David L. HAWKSWORTH Abstract: Cryptolechia carneolutea is the type species of the genus Cryptolechia, a rare taxon classified as endangered in the UK, now largely confined to ancient Fraxinus trees. The only tree with abundant growth of the species in one of its strongholds, the Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve in Devon, was blown over in a storm in April 2017, making it possible to collect material for molecular studies and transplant specimens to other Fraxinus trees in the area. The results of the phylogenetic analysis revealed C. carneolutea to be nested within the genus Gyalecta (Gyalectaceae). This further supports a broad circumscription of Gyalecta, after also including species previously placed in Belonia and Pachy- phiale as proposed in other recent studies. It might be possible to introduce an alternative genus concept in Gyalectaceae, not schematically based on ascoma type and ascospore number, but presently not enough data are available to proceed with such a novel classification. A review of the taxonomic concept of Cryptolechia demonstrates that this name was used inconsistently in the past, and its possible inclusion in Gyalecta was anticipated by other authors. As the majority of species presently classified in Cryptolechia had been placed in Gyalecta before, only five new combinations are required to provide formal inclusion of all taxa in the latter genus: Gyalecta bicellulata (Kalb) D. Hawksw. & Lücking comb. nov., G. caudata (Kalb) D. Hawksw. & Lücking comb. nov., G. pittieriana (Kalb et al.) D. Hawksw. & Lücking comb. nov., G. saxatilis (Vězda) D. Hawksw. & Lücking comb. nov. and G. stellaris (Müll. Arg.) D. Hawksw. & Lücking comb. nov. We also supersede the previous lectotypification of Parmelia carneo- lutea Turner with the discovery of the holotype specimen in BM. Key words: Devon, Fraxinus, Gyalecta canariensis, Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve Accepted for publication 9 May 2019 Introduction Vezdǎ included eight species: G. carneolutea (Turner) Vezda,̌ G. myriadella (Nyl.) Vezda,̌ The genus known as Cryptolechia A. Massal. ̌ ̌ G. nana (Tuck.) Vezda, G. plurilocularis was instated in its current sense by Vezda (Vain.) Vezda,̌ G. saxatilis Vezda,̌ G. stellaris (1969) under the name Gyalectina ̌ ̌ (Müll. Arg.) Vezda, G. subincolorella (Nyl.) Vezda, based on Parmelia carneolutea Turner. Vezdǎ and G. versicolor (Müll. Arg.) Vezda.̌ In the protologue, Vezdǎ (1969) gave a Latin R. Lücking (corresponding author): Botanischer Garten description of the genus but no diagnosis to dis- und Botanisches Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, tinguish it from other genera in Gyalectaceae, Königin-Luise-Straße 6–8, 14195 Berlin, Germany. particularly Gyalecta Ach. and Pachyphiale Email: [email protected] Lönnr. Since Vezdǎ listed Biatorinopsis sect. B. Moncada: Licenciatura en Biología, Universidad Dis- trital Francisco José de Caldas, Cra. 4 No. 26D-54, Torre Polyphragma Müll. Arg. as a synonym, and de Laboratorios, Herbario, Bogotá D.C., Colombia; Müller (1894)haddefined that section as hav- Research Associate, Science & Education, The Field ing 8–16 ascospores per ascus, it is probable Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore, Chicago, IL 60605, that Vezdǎ (1969) considered the number of USA ascospores the principal diagnostic feature, D. L. Hawksworth: Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London then separating Gyalectina from Gyalecta by SW7 5BD, UK; Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology, polyspored asci and from Pachyphiale in having Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; more than eight but a maximum of 16 ascos- Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province, pores per ascus. 130118 China Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Athens, on 05 Oct 2021 at 15:16:48, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282919000240 288 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol. 51 Hawksworth (1972) pointed out that the While Dimerella was synonymized with Coe- type of Gyalectina, Parmelia carneolutea, had nogonium and excluded from Gyalectaceae previously been placed in the monospecific (Lücking & Kalb 2000; Kauff & Lutzoni genus Cryptolechia by Massalongo (1853). 2002; Rivas Plata et al. 2006), both Cryptole- According to Hawksworth (1972), Vězda chia and Ramonia later also accommodated had been aware of this but had argued that species with 8-spored asci (Kalb 2007; Apt- Massalongo (1853) had derived his concept root et al. 2015), rendering the traditional of Cryptolechia from a specimen erroneously separation from Gyalecta difficult. The phylo- identified as P. carneolutea but which actually genetic position of Ramonia within Gyalecta- represented Pertusaria carneopallida (Nyl.) ceae is uncertain; the available sequences Anzi ex Nyl. (currently a synonym of P. protu- have variously been identified as Ramonia berans (Sommerf.) Th. Fr.). This had led sp. and Xerotrema sp., and their identity is Zahlbruckner (1907) to include Cryptolechia unclear (Lücking et al. 2004; Schmitt et al. as a synonym of Ochrolechia A. Massal., 2005; Wedin et al. 2005; Miadlikowska et al. before he changed his mind and listed the 2014). The separation of Cryptolechia from name as a synonym of Gyalecta (Zahlbruck- Pachyphiale was obscure from the beginning. ner 1924). When Vězda (1969) established Zahlbruckner (1907) considered Cryptolechia Gyalectina, the Code was ambiguous as to to be based on Lecanora (i.e. Pertusaria) car- the correct typification of a generic name neopallida, and so in Gyalectaceae he only dis- when the name of the type species had been tinguished Pachyphiale with polysporous asci misapplied, and so he did not adopt Cryptole- and more than 1-septate ascospores, but chia but considered it a synonym of Pertusaria gave the number of ascospores for that (Vězda, in Ainsworth et al. 1971: 631). Sub- genus as 12 or more. The species of Pachy- sequently, a provision was added to the Code phiale accepted by Zahlbruckner at the time to fix the typification of a generic name to (i.e. P. carneola (Ach.) Arnold, P. corticola the name of its type, not the specimen to Lönnr. and P. fagicola (Arnold) Zwackh) which the name had been misapplied (Tur- had (8–)24–48 spores per ascus but, for land et al. 2018: Art. 7.3). As a result, Hawks- unknown reasons, Zahlbruckner did not con- worth & Dibben (1982) adopted Cryptolechia sider Parmelia carneolutea as belonging here. as the correct name for Gyalectina and pro- The latter was later included in Pachyphiale vided the necessary combinations for the spe- by Sampaio (1921) and in Gyalecta by Zahl- cies previously placed in Gyalectina. bruckner (1924). Prior to molecular phylogenetic studies, When Vězda (1969) erected Gyalectina,he most workers accepted Belonia Körb., Coeno- apparently intended to separate species gonium Ehrenb., Cryptolechia, Dimerella Tre- with ≤ 8 spores per ascus (Gyalecta), (8–)12– vis., Gyalecta, Pachyphiale and Ramonia 16 spores per ascus (Gyalectina) and (8–)24– Stizenb. as genera in Gyalectaceae (Poelt 48 spores per ascus (Pachyphiale). This is sup- 1969; Purvis et al. 1992; Andrés 2003). In ported by his combination of Gyalecta geoi- addition to Belonia (ascomata perithecioid) coides Vain., a species with 24–48-spored and Coenogonium (thallus filamentous), pre- asci, into Pachyphiale in the same work, but molecular concepts separated these genera contradicted by his acceptance of Lecidea sub- as follows: incolorella Nyl., a species with 8-spored asci, – ascospores 1-septate, ≤ 8 per ascus = in Gyalectina.Vězda’s concept was neverthe- Dimerella less broadly accepted, although modified in – ascospores 1-septate, > 8 per ascus = subsequent works. Poelt (1969) distin- Ramonia guished the three genera as follows: – ascospores 3- to multiseptate or muri- – Gyalecta: asci 8-spored, (transversely septate form, ≤ 8 per ascus = Gyalecta to) muriform; apothecia variously coloured – ascospores 3- to multiseptate, > 8 per – Gyalectina: asci (8–)12(–16)-spored, trans- ascus = Cryptolechia, Pachyphiale. versely septate; apothecia yellowish Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Athens, on 05 Oct 2021 at 15:16:48, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282919000240 2019 Cryptolechia included in Gyalecta—Lücking et al. 289 – Pachyphiale: asci (8–)16(–48)-spored, Belonia and Pachyphiale nested within Gya- transversely septate; apothecia reddish lecta and subsequently both were formally brown. synonymized with the latter (Baloch et al. 2013). At that time, it seemed logical to also Poelt (1969) thus added apothecial colour subsume Cryptolechia within Gyalecta, but as an additional diagnostic feature to separate the only sequences then available, from a spe- Gyalectina from Pachyphiale. This concept cimen identified as Cryptolechia sp. from was adopted by Purvis et al. (1992) and Kenya (Mangold et al. 2008) and later Smith et al. (2009) for Cryptolechia, although labelled C. nana (Rivas Plata et al. 2013), a similar range of colour variation, from pale either clustered with the genus Lepra Scop. yellowish to red-brown, was accepted within (mtSSU: EU075572) or represented a con- the single genus Gyalecta. Other authors,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us