Shap Station Risk Review / Profile This document assesses the specific performance and risk within the fire station area. It provides more defined risk profiling down to Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) level. The risk profiling process by its very nature provides evidence of the fire risk within each geographical LSOA using detailed known risk and demographic information. The risk formula used to inform our fire risk profile was devised following the Intervention Standards Review, full details are available on our website: www.cumbria.gov.uk/fire The review also identifies other significant risks in the area that need consideration so that our resources are appropriately allocated across the county. As well as looking at county wide issues and trends in the main Integrated Risk Management Plan (IRMP), this individual station risk profile considers: • Current resources • Appliance availability • Operational response activity • Fire risk profile • Next nearest supporting appliances • Location specific risks including: heritage risk, environment risk, site specific risks: flooding risks, rurality and resilience risk. Resources The station is situated towards the north end of the village. There is one fire engine stationed there and it is currently crewed by 9 firefighters working the on call duty system. On-call Fire Engine Availability 2014 During 2014 the fire engine in Shap was off the run 403 hours or 4.60%. Activity Considering incident numbers and types over time, the following table illustrates that the Shap station area has seen a considerable reduction in the number of incidents: Incident Activity in Recent Incident Activity in historical Station Area Fire engines / Crewing System historical Station Area Averaged over 2011‐14 period Fire Station Average Average Average Average Average Average Number Crewing System Number of Number of Number No of No of No of of Incidents Incidents of AFAs Road Property Fire 2003/2004 2008/2009 Incidents Traffic Fires engines Collisions Shap 66 58 36 6.7 11.3 2 1 On Call The following number of incidents have occurred in Shap Station Area but not necessarily attended by the Shap fire engine: 2 Activity continued 3 Activity continued The Shap fire engine has ‘booked in attendance’ at the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended may have been in neighbouring station areas. Incidents Attended Apr‐2009‐Mar‐2015 by C68 Station Pumps CallSign Incident_Type 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 Total C68P1 FA - Apparatus 116945843 FA - Good Intent 8 10 3 8 3 4 36 FA - Malicious 1 2 3 Fire - Chimney 6 5755230 Fire - Primary Dw elling 2 2 6 4 14 Fire - Primary NonResidential 3 3 2 1 3 2 14 Fire - Primary OtherResidential 1 1 Fire - Primary Outdoor 2 2 Fire - Primary RoadVehicle 4 9 3 4 11 5 36 Fire - Secondary 5 2 2 2 1 4 16 SSC - Other 3 3144520 SSC - RTC 6 11 11 14 17 15 74 Total 495240485149289 4 Fire Risk Profile The high level risk profile below, for the station, illustrates how the exposure to risk over the last eight years has moved. Incidents 2003/4 ‐ Incidents 2004/5 ‐ Incidents 2005/6 ‐ Incidents 2006/7 ‐ Incidents 2007/8 ‐ Incidents 2008/9 ‐ Incidents 2009/1 ‐ Incidents 2010/11 ‐ C68 Shap Risk Profile 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 2008/9 Risk 2009/10 Risk 2010/11 Risk 2011/12 Risk 2012/13 Risk 2013/14 Risk 2014/15 Risk 2015/16 Risk Score Risk Grade No. of No. of No. of No. Of No. Of No. Of No. Of No. Of Risk Score SOAs Risk Score SOAs Risk Score SOAs Risk Score SOAs Risk Score SOAs Risk Score SOAs Risk Score SOAs Risk Score SOAs 76 and above High 0000000000000000 35 to 75 Medium3813813613613813610000 34 and below Low 402482522562522482663643 78 3 86 3 88 3 92 3 90 3 84 3 66 3 64 3 Total Risk Score 86 88 92 90 84 66 64 78 10.26% 12.82% 17.95% 15.38% 7.69% ‐15.38% ‐17.95% Risk Score Increase/Reduction over the period Next nearest Supporting Appliances The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Shap Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations. Distance by Station Name Road (MILES) Penrith 9.5 Appleby 11 Kendal 16 Other contextual information Shap village lies on the edge of the English Lake District and has a population of 1700. It is situated on the A6 road which is about two miles from the M6 motorway and near to the West Coast Mainline Railway. Fire crews from Shap attend an assortment of house fires, vehicle fires, chimney fires and grass fires. They also attend flooding incidents and have been involved in the rescue of trapped farm animals. The majority of calls are to the M6 motorway attending road traffic collisions. One of the most notable incidents the Shap crew attended was that of the RAF Hawk Jet that crashed on the railway bridge at the north end of the village killing both pilots. Shap Risk in station area Shap Abbey The Image Garden Grade I listed: Church of St Lawrence, Crosby Ravensworth Grade II* listed: Strickland Hall and stables adjoining, Little Strickland 2 summer houses on bowling green immediately to south of Maulds Meaburn Hall, Maulds Meaburn Maulds Meaburn Hall Garden walls and gate piers to front of Maulds Meaburn Hall Heritage Flass House, Maulds Meaburn Newby Hall and area wall to north, Newby Memorial to Thomas Lawson and shelter against east wall of Friends Burial Ground, Newby Church of All Saints, Orton Petty Hall, Orton Reagill Grange, Reagill Market Hall, Shap Lune Viaduct at Newbys Dub, Firbank SAC: Naddle Forest (NY 494144) Environment 7 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Shap Quarry (CORUS) Limestone Site Specific Shap Quarry (HANSON) Limestone + Tarmac plant Risk Shap Quarry (CEMEX) Granite + Tarmac plant West Coast Main line Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 3 Super Out Put Areas that Rurality make up Shap all are “Village and Hamlet”. The maps below examine the profile of the station in regard to broader risks. In this context, the maps represent the vulnerability (or risk) of a LSOA to a particular incident type, not a prediction of such an event happening in the future. Please note, a threshold has been set across the county in order to identify areas of greater risk from specific incident types, to inform prevention strategies and resource provision. 7 .