HIATUS RESOLUTION STRATEGIES in NON-RHOTIC ENGLISH: the CASE of /R/-LIAISON

HIATUS RESOLUTION STRATEGIES in NON-RHOTIC ENGLISH: the CASE of /R/-LIAISON

ICPhS XVII Regular Session Hong Kong, 17-21 August 2011 HIATUS RESOLUTION STRATEGIES IN NON-RHOTIC ENGLISH: THE CASE OF /r/-LIAISON Jose A. Mompeána & F. Alberto Gómezb aUniversity of Murcia, Spain; bUniversity College London, UK [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT /aɪdɪər əv ɪt/–, a phenomenon known as ‘intrusive’ This paper looks at the different hiatus resolution /r/. Finally, in potential contexts in which the first vowel is [+high] and unrounded, a palatal glide is strategies in potential cases of /r/-liaison in non- j rhotic English. Potential contexts of /r/-liaison often inserted –e.g. flying [flaɪ ɪŋ]–while if the first vowel is [+high] and rounded –e.g. going were identified in a corpus of BBC newscasts and w analysed auditorily and acoustically for the [ˈɡəʊ ɪŋ]–, a labial-velar glide is inserted. occurrence of /r/-liaison, glottal stops, creaky voice 2. HIATUS-BREAKING IN POTENTIAL /r/- or hiatus. The results show that /r/-liaison is a LIAISON CONTEXTS: A STUDY common hiatus-breaking strategy although there are significant differences between linking /r/ and Although the hiatus-breaking strategies in varieties intrusive /r/. They also show that glottal hiatus- of English have long been observed and described, breaking strategies are common and that creaky little empirical research has so far been carried out voice is more frequent than true glottal stops while into different aspects of the use of those strategies hiatus is not very frequent. The discussion focuses and their variability. As a case in point, /r/-liaison on the reason why glottal strategies seem to be has long been discussed in the relevant literature gaining ground as opposed to the use of /r/. e.g. [4] but few empirical studies have focused on its variability, with some remarkable exceptions Keywords: /r/-liaison, hiatus, glottal stop, creaky e.g. [6, 10]. The findings obtained in these studies voice show, for example that linking /r/ is more frequent 1. INTRODUCTION than intrusive /r/. However, little is known about the hiatus-breaking strategies used when /r/-liaison Hiatus refers to the situation in which two vowel does not apply. Evidence of an anecdotal nature sounds occur in adjacent syllables with no suggests that speakers use glottal stops –see [3] for intervening consonant between both. a review–. As mentioned below, however, glottal Many languages disallow or restrict hiatus, the stops are often realised as creaky voice, typically insertion of an epenthetic consonant being one of associated with vocal folds tightly adducted but the most common strategies to avoid it. Most open along a portion of their length. If hiatus is varieties of English, for instance, have at their understood as the occurrence of two modally disposal a wide rage of hiatus-breaking strategies. voiced vowels in adjacent syllables with no change For example, in a standard non-rhotic British in phonation at the boundary between them, creaky English variety like Received Pronunciation – voice can be considered as a further strategy to henceforth RP–, three of the most common prevent hiatus. strategies are the use of /n/ with the indefinite Given the apparent variability in the use of article ‘a(n)’, where a relic [n] is inserted to block hiatus resolution strategies in potential /r/-liaison hiatus (cf. a pear /ə peə/ vs. an apple /ən æpl/). contexts, different questions can be asked Also, in potential hiatus contexts in which the first regarding those strategies and their frequency of vowel is [-high], /r/ is often used to prevent hiatus occurrence. This study addresses four of those across word boundaries, a phenomenon known as questions: how common is /r/-liaison?; b) are /r/-liaison or /r/-sandhi. When this phenomenon is differences in rate of occurrence between linking the consequence of the historical loss of rhoticity /r/ and intrusive /r/ described so far confirmed?; c) but spelling still retains <r(e)> –e.g. fear of it are laryngeal strategies (use of glottal stops, creaky /fɪər əv ɪt/–, it is typically referred to as ‘linking voice) a common hiatus-breaking strategy when /r/’. However, /r/ can also be inserted when there are no etymological traces of /r/ <r> –e.g. idea of it 1414 ICPhS XVII Regular Session Hong Kong, 17-21 August 2011 /r/-liaison is not used?; d) how common is hiatus in linking /r/ as well as tokens of <a/aw> followed by potential /r/-liaison contexts?. a space bar and a vowel letter (e.g. <..(Asi)a Based on previous studies, it is hypothesized a(nd)..>, <..(s)aw i(t)..>, etc.) for intrusive /r/. This that: a) /r/-liaison will be a common hiatus- process resulted in the identification of 2721 breaking strategy; b) linking /r/ will be more potential spelling-based of /r/-liaison (linking /r/: common than intrusive /r/; c) laryngeal hiatus 1971; intrusive /r/: 750), produced by a total of 215 resolution strategies will be very common; and d) speakers (59 females, 156 males). hiatus will be uncommon as strategies to avoid it The second stage involved a phonetic will be used instead. ‘trimming’ of the potential spelling-based /r/- liaison contexts. This involved analysing all those 2.1. Method potential contexts auditorily and acoustically to 2.1.1. Data rule out contexts where the presence of a pause prevented the appearance of hiatus or a hiatus The study focused on the non-rhotic accent of resolution strategy. Bearing in mind future English known as RP, as exemplified in the speech subsequent analysis of the material studied, only of BBC newsreaders. RP was chosen as it is speakers with potential intrusive and linking /r/ relatively easy to find considerable recorded were considered, which ruled 20 females and 33 speech that exemplifies it, and because it was males so the total number of speakers was 39 considered important to rule out speakers’ accent females and 123 males. In the end, 140 potential as a source of variation in the results. Following spelling-based cases of linking /r/ were ruled out, previous studies e.g. [10], use was made of a and 351 of intrusive /r/. Thus, a final number of corpus of newscasts from the BBC World Service, 1875 potential ‘trimmed’ cases of /r/-liaison were available in the Words in the News link. For the identified (linking /r/: 1476; intrusive /r/: 399). current study, a relatively large-scale sample The third and final stage was a further acoustic corresponding to the years 1999-2009 was used. and auditory analysis of the trimmed cases for This resource amounted to a total of 1503 speakers with both intrusive and linking /r/ newscasts, 1263 eventually included in the analysis contexts. Two independent researchers looked at and 240 ruled out because the speaker was not a the cases. When in disagreement, the opinion of a newsreader, the speech was not RP, the text was third judge was sought for. To carry out the technically unavailable, or the speaker’s identity spectrographic inspection of the sound files, use was unknown. Observing these criteria, 344 was made of SFS/WASP version 1.41, free speakers were considered and 86 left out due speech research software developed at UCL. to the absence in the latter’s speech of Oscillographic, spectrographic and F0 displays phonological/phonetic features typically of RP e.g. were made of all the trimmed cases. Auditory [4]. The relevant texts analysed amount to ca. inspection of the files was often enough to decide 250,000 words and 32 hours of audio material. whether /r/ was produced but presence of a low F3 2.1.2. Procedure was taken as a strong cue to /r/ in dubious cases. As to the presence of glottal stops, it has been Once the RP newscasts had been identified, the pointed out that a full voiceless glottal stop should procedure involved three stages: a) identification have complete obstruction of airflow at the glottis, of potential spelling contexts; b) phonetic preventing simultaneous phonation so a glottal ‘trimming’ of those contexts; and c) auditory and stop is unvoiced by definition. In theory, then, a acoustic analysis of the trimmed contexts. glottal stop should be easy to identify acoustically The first stage involved the identification of and it should be perceived when a single glottal potential spelling contexts of /r/-liaison, i.e. pulse occurs. Creaky voice, however, should be contexts where the spelling suggests /r/-liaison perceived when several such pulses occur in a row, could apply. To achieve this, automatic searches giving the impression of a rapid series of taps [5]. were made on a database created ad-hoc with the In practice, however, it is often hard to written version of the newscasts. The searches discriminate a glottal stop from creaky voice, even identified typical spellings of /r/-liaison contexts. for trained phoneticians [2], which may be partly Representative cases are tokens of <r/re> followed due to the fact that glottal stops and creaky voice by a space bar and a vowel letter (e.g. <..(ca)r are both produced with the same physiological i(s)..>, <..(mo)re o(f)..>, etc.) for potential cases of mechanism [7]. In fact, the occurrence of true 1415 ICPhS XVII Regular Session Hong Kong, 17-21 August 2011 glottal stops in English may be unusual e.g. [2] as With regards to the second research question, the so-called glottal stops in English are often i.e. whether there are differences in rate of realised as creaky voice, not requiring a complete occurrence between linking and intrusive /r/, the stop closure and immediate cessation of vocal fold data obtained show that there are significant pulses.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us