BEng Individual Project Imperial College London Department of Computing Issuing Green Bonds on the Algorand Blockchain Supervisors: Prof. William Knottenbelt and Author: Dr Maria Vigliotti Gidon Katten Second Marker: Dr. Arthur Gervais August 25, 2021 arXiv:2108.10344v1 [cs.CR] 23 Aug 2021 Abstract Green bonds have been shown to be effective tool for sustainability however market growth is impeded by high issuance and transaction costs. The lack of appropriate standardisation and frameworks raise fear of greenwashing. In this paper, we propose a platform for green bond issuance on the Algorand blockchain. It offers Green Bonds as a Service, increasing accessibility through automation. The solution has minimal associated costs and supports fractional asset ownership, both of which will help adoption especially in developing countries. A financial regulator must preapprove an investor and can freeze assets in the case of financial irregularities. Green bonds can be bought directly from an issuer or in the secondary market. We also introduce a novel mechanism whereby an issuer can upload proof of impact reports. A green verifier uses these to submit a green rating; poor green ratings result in reputational damage and economic penalties. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people: • My project supervisors Professor William Knottenbelt and Dr Maria Vigliotti for our insightful meetings and discussions throughout the project. • Dr. Arthur Gervais for his advice early on in the project and his course, Principles of Distributed Ledgers. • Dr. Enrico Biffis for his recommendations and ideas relating to the financial side of the project. • My personal tutor, Dr. Krysia Broda, for her continued support throughout my time at Imperial College London. Contents 1 Introduction5 1.1 Motivation . .5 1.2 Objectives . .6 1.3 Contributions . .6 2 Background8 2.1 Bonds . .8 2.2 Green Bonds . .9 2.2.1 Green Bond Standards . .9 2.2.2 Green Bond Market . 10 2.2.3 Blockchain Green Bonds . 11 2.3 Blockchain . 12 2.3.1 Proof of Work vs. Proof of Stake . 12 2.3.2 Smart Contracts . 13 2.3.3 Decentralised Applications . 14 2.3.4 Tokens and Stablecoins . 14 2.4 Algorand . 15 2.4.1 Accounts . 15 2.4.2 Algorand Standard Assets . 15 2.4.3 Atomic Transfers . 16 2.4.4 Smart Contracts . 16 2.4.5 Stateless Smart Contracts . 16 2.4.6 Stateful Smart Contracts . 17 2.4.7 TEAL . 19 2.4.8 Fees . 20 3 Requirements and Design 21 3.1 Stakeholders . 21 3.1.1 Issuer . 21 3.1.2 Investor . 21 3.1.3 Green verifier . 22 3.1.4 Financial regulator . 22 3.2 Bond Life Cycle . 22 3.3 Green Rating . 23 3.4 Secondary Market . 24 4 Implementation 25 4.1 Algorand Blockchain . 25 2 4.1.1 Stablecoin . 25 4.1.2 Green Bond . 25 4.1.3 Linking Stateful and Stateless Smart Contracts . 26 4.1.4 ASA Custom Transfer Logic . 26 4.1.5 Smart Contracts . 28 4.1.6 Green Rating . 30 4.1.7 Freeze . 30 4.1.8 Buy . 30 4.1.9 Trade . 31 4.1.10 Coupon . 32 4.1.11 Principal . 33 4.1.12 Default . 34 4.1.13 InterPlanetary File System . 35 4.1.14 Testing . 35 4.1.15 Alternative Implementations . 36 4.2 DApp . 36 4.2.1 Languages, Frameworks and Tools Used . 37 4.2.2 Redux . 38 4.2.3 React Components . 39 4.2.4 MyAlgo . 40 4.2.5 Issuer . 41 4.2.6 Investor . 41 4.2.7 Green Verifier . 42 4.2.8 Financial Regulator . 42 5 Evaluation 43 5.1 Algorand Fees . 43 5.2 Green Rating . 45 5.3 Security . 46 5.4 Contributions to The Algorand Ecosystem . 47 5.5 Algorand . 47 5.6 Comparison With Existing Solutions . 48 5.6.1 Green Assets Wallet . 48 6 Legal and Ethical Issues 49 7 Conclusion 50 7.1 Reflection . 50 7.2 Summary of Achievements . 50 7.3 Future Work . 51 7.3.1 Blockchain Oracles For Impact Reporting . 51 7.3.2 Green Penalties . 51 7.3.3 Primary Market . 51 7.3.4 Automated Transactions . 51 A User Guide 52 A.1 Create An Account . 52 A.2 Set Up My Algo Wallet . 53 A.3 Fund Algos . 54 A.4 Fund Stablecoin . 55 3 A.5 Issuer . 55 A.6 Investor . 57 A.7 Green Verifier . 58 A.8 Financial Regulator . 58 4 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation Rapid change and innovation is needed across the world to ensure countries align themselves with the Paris Agreement of keeping the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C. Green bonds are fixed income instruments used to fund environmentally friendly projects and can be a fundamental tool for climate investment. Currently the global green bond market represents approximately 2% of the overall bond market [1]. Growth is impaired by high issuance and transaction costs [2], in particular for emerging markets where the size of issuance tends to be smaller [3]. One has to look at the fundamentals of the green bond market to understand why a blockchain is an appropriate solution [4]. With the exception of treasury bonds, investors must go through a broker to purchase bonds. A bond broker acts as a intermediary between buyers and sellers and may take advantage of the lack of price transparency by marking up prices. In addition, each trade typically has to go through a settlement period, where one has to wait a few days between the trade agreement and the date at which the trade is considered final. Specific to green bonds, there is an added relationship between the issuer and investor. An investor wants to avoid contributing to greenwashing, whereby the funds generated from the bond are not actually used for green projects. The issuer must produce data and outline the use of proceeds to satisfy investor distrust. At this time, there are no mechanisms to enforce issuer compliance [5]. Blockchain presents a number of opportunities. Blockchain can help streamline the clearing and settlement process of green bonds through disintermediation [6]. Transparent smart contracts would automatically perform atomic transactions, reducing costs and counter- party risk. Blockchain also enables self-custody whereby issuers and investors alike can securely store and manage their assets. This not only eliminates custodian fees, but also helps democratise the green bond market as one does not need access to a financial inter- mediary service. Green bond issuance, irrespective of an issuers size, would face similar fees, opening up the retail market. Blockchain can also help automate green bond reporting and provide a structure for green accountability. A credible green bond market can be built by integrating use of proceeds and proof of impact reporting. 5 Blockchain has been receiving negative media attention regarding its energy consumption. The University of Cambridge Bitcoin Consumption Index [7] estimates Bitcoin uses similar amounts of energy per year compared to countries such as Argentina and the Netherlands. Some would argue this subsequently makes blockchain a bad candidate for green bond issuance, where green investors may be reluctant to use such a technology. Algorand uses a Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism whereas Bitcoin and Ethereum use Proof of Work (PoW). PoS consumes several orders of magnitude less energy than PoW [8]. Ethereum is working on switching to PoS but it remains to be seen when this will happen. This makes Algorand an ideal candidate for green bond issuance. Furthermore the Algorand team claim their blockchain is carbon neutral [9]. Whilst there has yet to be independent research on Algorand’s energy consumption, many environmentally focused companies are leveraging Algorand [10]. The Algorand blockchain is a permissions blockchain so everyone can review the market and make informed investment decisions. It has a high transaction throughput and low transaction costs, making it accessible to smaller investors. Algorand also has native support for smart contracts and tokens which benefit from the same speed and cost as any other transaction. 1.2 Objectives The objectives for the project were: 1. Developing a solution to issue green bonds on the blockchain and assess benefits for all stakeholders.