Alternate Assessment Code of Ethics

Alternate Assessment Code of Ethics

Alternate Assessment Manual for the Arizona Student Achievement Program October 2005 Alternate Assessment Committee Heather Bates (Reading content specialist) Maria Berecin-Rascon Tucson Unified School District Casa Grande Elementary District Cyndi Bolewski Mary Brownell ADE, Exceptional Student Services Kyrene Elementary School District Judy Croswell Elaine Ehrenberg, Ed.D. ADE, Exceptional Student Services ADE, Exceptional Student Services Judy Garrett, Ph.D. Elliot Gory, Ph.D. Arizona State University West Tempe Elementary School District Marilyn Griffin, Ed.D. Donna Hahn Scottsdale Unified School District Tempe Union High School District Daniel Juliano, Ph.D. Stephanie MacFarland, Ph.D. Kyrene Elementary School District University of Arizona Larry McBiles, Ph.D. Joan McDonald Arizona Foundation for Resource Education Tolleson Elementary School District Victoria Noseck Nancy Nowlin Arizona State Schools for the Deaf and the ADE, Exceptional Student Services Blind Judy Reihard (Math content specialist) Ellen Rutemiller Tempe Union High School District Madison Elementary School District Darlene Sithole Judy Sullivan Tucson Unified School District Gilbert Unified School District Catherine A. Taylor Kathleen Thomas Tucson Unified School District Casa Grande Elementary School District Lynette Thompson Dene Wallace InterAct Arizona, Arizona State Tempe Union High School District University Julie Williams, Ed.D. Leila Williams Desert Valley Regional Cooperative Tucson Unified School District John Wilson Tempe Elementary School District - i - Field Study Participants Arizona State Schools for the Deaf and the Blind: Mary Adkisson Lisa Costa Paula Hensley Lisa Jackson Sandra Rafeedie Sandra Reino Donna Riccobono Judy Schumacher Jennifer Wolf Casa Grande Elementary School District: Maria Berecin-Rascon Ginnie Gatlin Corianna Lee Sandy McIntyre Edward O’Neill Rita Wiebold Catalina Foothills Unified School District: Madeline Edwards Suzie Speilman Fowler Elementary School District: Sharon Nelson Kyrene Elementary School District: Melissa Aratin-Wakeham Nancy Hoddy Joan Howard Carol Lang Aimee Lindemann Joann Thomas Ethan Todd Rainbow Accommodation School, Holbrook: Autumn Hanson Sahuarita Unified School District: Sherry Mulholland Joanne Wilson Tolleson Elementary School District: Lynn Gangloff Pendergast Elementary School District Nicole Havertine Tucson Unified School District: Sarah Bock Pamela Crooke Cynthia Anne Dryer Chris Ducsai Jim Gillen Marianne Klier Kim Kurz Michelle Morden Wanda Pankratz Elizabeth Rivera Mickey Rumic-Cox Velma Valenzuela Victoria Vaughn Paul Wallace Vail Unified School District: Tina Williams - ii - Table of Contents Overview of State Testing and Changes in This Manual for the Current School Year..........1 Arizona Student Achievement Program......................................................................................3 Assessment Options by Grade Level for All Arizona Students ................................................4 Testing-Related Web Sites ............................................................................................................5 Alternate Assessment Code of Ethics...........................................................................................6 Requirements for Alternate Assessment......................................................................................7 Alternate Assessment Forms.........................................................................................................9 Alternate Assessments Graphic Overview.................................................................................10 Statewide Assessment Reference Guide.....................................................................................11 Questions About Administering Alternate Assessments..........................................................12 Descriptions of and Directions for Testing Forms....................................................................13 Level I and Level II: Form 1: Alternate Assessment Eligibility Criteria for State Assessments ...........13 Level I and Level II: Analytic Scoring Tool (AST).....................................................................................18 Level I or Level II: Form 2: Standards Status Report ............................................................................21 Using Form 2 for AIMS-A ..................................................................................21 Using Form 2 for the Alternate State Achievement Test .................................23 Using Form 2 for Alternate Assessment for the DAP.......................................24 Using Form 2 for IEP Development...................................................................24 - iii - Descriptions of and Directions for Testing Forms (continued) Level I: Form 3: AIMS-A Performance Evaluation .............................................................25 Level I: Form 4: Parent Interview..........................................................................................26 Level I: Form 5: Activity-Based Performance Assessment..................................................28 Level II: Form 3: Activity-Based Performance Assessment..................................................28 Data Sheet..........................................................................................................28 Score Sheet.........................................................................................................30 Level I and Level II: Portfolio Recommendations......................................................................................31 Level I or Level II: AIMS-A Student Report............................................................................................32 Level I or Level II: ASAT Student Report................................................................................................33 Electronic Submission of Alternate Assessment Data ..............................................................34 Special Program Membership ............................................................................................39 Problems You May Encounter (Error Messages).............................................................42 Demographic Information Form (DIF)..................................................................................... 44 Alternate Assessment Timelines.................................................................................................45 Students Served Outside the District of Residence...................................................................47 Appendices....................................................................................................................................49 Appendix A: Glossary of Terms .........................................................................................49 Appendix B: Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in this Manual ...................................51 Appendix C: Activity-Based Performance Assessment Activities...................................53 - iv - Overview of State Testing and Changes in This Manual for the Current School Year AIMS DPA, AIMS HS, and TerraNova AIMS—Dual Purpose Assessment: Arizona’s Instrument to Measure Standards (or AIMS), a criterion-referenced test, now includes items from the TerraNova achievement test, a norm- referenced instrument, embedded in the assessments for grades 3–8. This assessment is called Arizona’s Instrument to Measure Standards Dual Purpose Assessment or AIMS DPA. AIMS—High School: The AIMS for high school, AIMS HS, which does not contain the norm- referenced items, is given to students in grade 10 (11 and 12, if needed for graduation). TerraNova: In grades 2 and 9, the TerraNova achievement test, the norm-referenced test that replaced the Stanford Achievement Test, is administered by itself. No out-of-level testing: Although there are no options for out-of-level testing on the AIMS or TerraNova, special education students are allowed to take the alternate test (AIMS-A) or to use either standard or alternate accommodations. Students take the grade level AIMS or AIMS-A in AIMS assessment years and the grade level TerraNova or the ASAT in TerraNova assessment years. IEP teams are advised to consult the document on AIMS and TerraNova testing when making standard and alternate accommodation decisions for special education students for the classroom and for AIMS or TerraNova testing. Options for special education students: Below is a list of available options for IEP teams to consider in making decisions about testing: ♦ grade level assessment—with no accommodations ♦ grade level assessment—with standard accommodations ♦ grade level assessment—with alternate accommodations ♦ grade level assessment—with standard and alternate accommodations ♦ alternate assessment—Level I (grades 2-12) ♦ alternate assessment—Level II (grades 6-12) AIMS-A and ASAT AIMS-A and ASAT, Levels I and II: AIMS-A (the alternate AIMS) and ASAT (the alternate to the TerraNova) both have two levels for assessment purposes. Level I is the original assessment; Level II is for students whose performance on the Level I Functional and Kindergarten level assessments meets or exceeds the performance standards. Students who are attending 6th through 12th grades and who are working on the articulated standards at the 1st through 3rd grades (at a beginning level) and who meet the definition of significant cognitive disability are eligible for consideration to take Level II assessments.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    63 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us