Liquid-Jet Laser-Plasma Sources for Sub-5-Nm Emission

Liquid-Jet Laser-Plasma Sources for Sub-5-Nm Emission

Liquid-jet laser-plasma sources for sub-13 nm emission Hans Hertz Biomedical & X-Ray Physics Dept. of Applied Physics Royal Inst. of Technol. (KTH) Stockholm & COB: Excillum AB Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Present source for 13 nm EUVL • Wavelength: =13.5 nm • Regenerative target: Sn • High-reflectivity mirror: Mo/Si From O’Sullivan, J Phys B (2015) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Why shorter wavelength? RESOLUTION= 푘 1 푁퐴 Key issues: • Laser-plasma source @ sub-13 nm • Power • Target • stable • regenerative • Mirror reflectivity • Photo resist sensitivity DOF = 푘 2 푁퐴 2 Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 What do we have? Liquid-jet/droplet laser-plasma sources Principles 2.4 nm Liquid nitrogen + High rep.-rate operation + High-power operation 50 mm + Tailored spectral emission + Negligible debris Rymell et al, Opt. Commun. (1993) 2-4 nm: Water-window =11-13 nm: EUV Litho Ethanol />500 Rymell et al, APL (1995); Berglund et al APL (1997);Jansson et al, RSI (2005) ;Hansson et al, MNE (2001);Takman et al APL (2004) ;Martz et al, Opt. Lett. (2012) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 = 2.48 nm power: 200 W, 600 ps, 2 KHz DPSS laser plasma Photon flux Spectral brightness: Lab source at early-bending-magn level! Source size 2000 Hz 100 Hz 10 Hz Martz et al, Opt. Lett. (2012) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Sub 13 nm: Which are our options? • moderately/highly charged ions • n=4 − n=4 transitions Target (nm) Mirror Sn 13.5 Mo/Si Xe Xe 11.5 Mo/Be, Ru/Be.. Gd, Tb 6-7 La/B C, N 2-4 W/B4C, Cr/Sc C Ka From O’Sullivan, J Phys B (2015) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Liquid-jet/droplet basics Transition Turbulent Laminar Spray Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Liquid-jet/droplet basics Stability: Laminar flow region LN2 jet L 푎 8푎3 6푎 L= 푙푛 푣 + 표 Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm =13.5 nm: First liquid-tin-jet source Stable jet @ >250 C Spectral match Debris: 1 h gave coating Mitigation need: ~108 CE: 2.5% into (2%BW2sr) PRESENTLY: Sn liquid jets is the source for HVM EUV litho Jansson et al . Appl. Phys. Lett. (2004) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 =11.5 nm: First liquid-xenon-jet source Exp. arrangement Jet cooling Stability Spectrum 50 mm Hansson et al, Microel. Engin. (2000); Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Cryogenic liquid jets: LN2 jet laser-plasma stability High-speed jet imaging Classical liquid-jet stability 4 ns laser, 20 Hz LN2 liquid-jet stability Freeze Burst Sinuous Spray instability CW Pulsed Illumination Fogelqvist et al, J. Appl. Phys. (2015) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Avoiding evaporative effects while still keeping pressure low Local radiative heating No Pressure Radiative heat stabilization stabilization stabilization Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Long-term stability: 1h Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 =11.5 nm: Mirrors Chkhalo & Salashchenko, EUVL workshop 2013 Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 = 6-7 nm: Gd, Tb La/B mirrors: theoretically R=80% From O’Sullivan, J Phys B (2015) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 = 6-7 nm w/ Gd, Tb in liquid jets? E.g., C16H28GdN5O9 MRI contrast agent 7% Gd by weight Increase possible ,,: waterlike Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 = 6-7 nm w/ Gd, Tb nanoparticle slurries? (a) (b) (c) Y Zr Nb (d) (e) MRI contrast agent : Gd2O3 NP:s Uniform size distribution Potentially >10-20 % by weight ,,: waterlike Li et al, submitted (2018) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 = 2-4 nm? Ethanol Methanol Liquid nitrogen Rymell et al, Opt. Commun. (1993) Berglund et al, RSI (1996) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 = 2-4 nm Power? Ultraviolet prepulse for enhanced x-ray emission and brightness from droplet-target laser plasmas M. Berglund,a) L. Rymell, and H. M. Hertz Department of Physics, Lund Institute of Technology, P. O. Box 118, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden ~Received 28 May 1996; accepted for publication 9 July 1996 We show that an ultraviolet prepulse significantly enhances the water-window x-ray emission and brightness for a droplet-target laser plasma. By combining a 65 mJ, 120 ps, =532 nm main pulse with an up to 3 mJ prepulse, the emitted x-ray photon flux may be increased more than eight times. The resulting C VI =3.37 nm line emission is more than 3×1012 photons/sr.pulse, corresponding to a conversion efficiency above 3%/line. The integrated spectral brightness is increased two times and is found to reach its maximum for different prepulse parameters than those resulting in maximum photon flux. © 1996 American Institute of Physics. @S0003-6951~96!03938-1# 106 drops/sec Berglund et al, APL (1996) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 = 2-4 nm Power II Berglund et al, APL 1996: Target: C2H5OH (52% C by weight) Emission: = 3.37 nm E=368 eV (C VI) Laser: 3+65 mJ/pulse Flux: 3×1012 photons/sr×pulse Assume: Rep rate: 105 Hz Laser: 100 mJ/pulse (i.e., 10 kW) Collection: sr Results in: Approx. 100 W @ =3.37 nm Issues?: Jet stability? Self absorption? Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Summary • Liquid-jet laser plasmas w/ =2-11 nm emission are decently well understood. • Power? – possibly • Stability? – possibly • Mirrors? – see upcoming talk • Will it happen? Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Biomedical & X-Ray Physics Dept of Appl. Physics @ KTH/Stockholm Soft X-Rays X-Ray Optics ultrasound control Nanochemistry Ultrasonics Hard X-Rays Eye Optics Teaching & Technical Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Which are our options? From xxxx, SPIE () Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 IN PARALLELL First liquid-droplet EUV source – oxygen @ 13 nm Ethanol target Nd:YAG 10 ns Low debris Rymell et al, Proc. XRM IV (1993) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 EUV sources II: Next liquid-droplet EUV source - water droplets 1 O VII @ 13 nm 0.5 Intensity (arb. units) (arb. Intensity 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 Wavelength (nm) Why use liquid jet/droplet laser-plasmas for HVM EUV litho? • Thermal • Hot plasma at a distance • High average power via high rep rate Hertz et al, SPIE (1995) • Rapid target material production Malmqvist et al, EUV Litho, OSA (1996) Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018 Liquid-jet/droplet laser-plasma sources: Early history 1992 1988? 1990 First XRM slide First spectrum First liquid-droplet Laser-plasma slide Cf. Göttingen First crew Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Stockholm Prague 2018.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    26 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us