Complications of Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery: Evaluation, Intervention, and Resolution—A Review from Both Specialties W42, 16 October 2012 14:00 - 18:00

Complications of Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery: Evaluation, Intervention, and Resolution—A Review from Both Specialties W42, 16 October 2012 14:00 - 18:00

Complications of Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery: Evaluation, Intervention, and Resolution—A Review from Both Specialties W42, 16 October 2012 14:00 - 18:00 Start End Topic Speakers 14:00 14:10 Introduction Howard Goldman 14:10 14:35 Complications of incontinence surgery (except Sandip Vasavada retention) 14:35 15:10 Retention/Voiding dysfunction after incontinence Roger Dmochowski surgery 15:10 15:30 Discussion All 15:30 16:00 Break None 16:00 16:35 Complications of prolapse surgery (except Howard Goldman dyspareunia) 16:35 17:00 Dyspareunia after pelvic floor surgery Tristi Muir 17:00 17:40 Discussion All 17:40 18:00 Questions All Aims of course/workshop This course will summarize both common and uncommon complications associated with standard and new technologies used for pelvic floor reconstruction and urinary incontinence therapy in women. The intent of this course is to present both the approach to evaluation and management of these complications from both the urologic and urogynecologic perspective of the combined faculty. The emphasis is on newer technologies and complications, both acute and chronic, which are associated with these various surgeries. The goal of this course will be to summarize, not only identification, but also evaluation and appropriate intervention, as well as patient counselling for these various complications. Educational Objectives This course will provide a detailed paradigm for avoiding, evaluating and managing complications of incontinence and prolapse surgery. Evidence continues to accrue in this area but it runs the spectrum from Level 1 to 5 with much being expert opinion. Unfortunately, very little cross comparison exists to support these differing interventions. The intent of this course will be to summarize and use this evidence along with the expert opinion of the panel and their peers to develop a paradigm for approach of these complications. The presentations will provide detailed instruction and in particular case discussions by recognized experts in this field. 5/23/2012 Complications of Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery: Evaluation, Complications of Stress Intervention, and Resolution—A Incontinence Surgery (Slings) : Review from Both Specialties (Excluding Voiding Issues) Sandip P Vasavada MD Sandip Vasavada, MD Roger R Dmochowski MD Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Howard B Goldman MD Institute Tristi W Muir MD Cleveland, Ohio Complications of Vaginal Sling Surgery Bleeding During Sling Surgery • Bleeding • Urethral injury • Retropubic passage: • Infection • Neurologic injury/pain – entry into retropubic space • Sling placement/close observation • Bladder • Mesh related • Foley catheter into bladder, 60cc in balloon and injury/Perforation – Extrusions into vagina compression – Mesh erosions into • Bladder outlet – Trochar passage urethra obstruction • Point cautery – Mesh erosions into bladder • Usually due to close passage near urethra/periurethral neurovascular compartments – Retropubic TVT passage (recognition of injury is key) • Exploration (retropubically/open): not transvaginally Bleeding in Slings • May occur 0.5 to 8% of time • No difference between Burch BNS and fascial slings based on SisteR trial (2009) • TOT lower likelihood of bleeding and transfusion rates overall less than 1% 1 5/23/2012 Obturator Anatomy Bleeding into Obturator Space Vasculature • Very little data Distances – Most bleeding will stop with some pressure and Medial branch vessel 3.1 cm (2.3-4.8 cm) placement of sling/compression Lateral branch vessel 4.3 cm (3.0-5.3 cm) – Foley balloon and inflate with 60 cc sterile water Device to most medial vessel 1.1 cm Device to canal 2.3 cm • What is the utility (if any) of a vaginal pack ? • case reports • Compartment syndrome potential • Use of angiography and embolization? Courtesy of J Whiteside, MD Bleeding during Retropubic Space Entry into Retropubic space (fascial entry slings etc..) • Entry into retropubic space – Preservation of endopelvic fascia Levator Periurethral fascia • Enter just lateral to periurethral fascia • Medial to levator fascia and musculature • Oblique angle 30 degrees from midline towards ipsilateral shoulder Infections Perioperative Urinary Tract infections • Sling related infections (with new type 1 • Post‐sling UTI incidence varies from 8‐33% (Anger, meshes are extremely uncommon) Laurikainen) – Studies not designed to look at this problem – Obtape – Loss to follow‐up – ProteGen – Lack of standardized perioperative management • Urinary tract infections can occur within the – Perioperative antibiotic protocols often not standardized – Diagnostic methods not clear first month after sling surgery • Skin and vaginal infections are rare (Laurikainen) – Discharge • Overall infection after sling is 5.5 % (Paraiso) – Slowing of urine stream • Used more commonly as a metric in Outcomes – Catheters etc.. 2 5/23/2012 Ob Tape Complications Infections/ Abscess 66 y/o female s/p TOT sling, fever, pain in thigh, fluctuance, no palp mass Courtesy of Howard B. Goldman, MD Courtesy of Howard B. Goldman, MD Bladder Injury/Perforation • Not uncommon • Most series of retropubic slings show rates of 0‐ 24% • TOT slings too • 6x less TOT • Recognized? • Cystoscopy – SUI guidelines TVT Complications Bladder perforation • Proper recognition of entry – Fluid emanating from space (urine) – Irrigation of foley (+/‐ Indigo Carmine) – Cystoscopy • Suture passage (no further therapy) • Multilayer closure +/‐ Martius flap • No overlapping suture lines • Good urinary drainage x 5 ‐ 7 days – Cystogram to confirm healed bladder wall 3 5/23/2012 LIGHT TEST FOR CYSTOCELE Urethral Injury • Overall low incidence (< 1%) • Again, essential to recognize injury – Careful cystourethroscopy – Reposition needle/trochars – Large injury: probably best to abort surgery (mesh) • Primary repair • Martius flap ?? • TOT incidence is extremely low but higher with outside in than inside out (BJU int 2010) Vasavada, Comiter, Raz, Urol 1999 Bowel Injury Bowel Injury Pubic Symphysis • Recognition is again key TVT Needle • Fatal reports (several) – MAUDE database – Some from expert TVT implanters Bowel – Can occur in antegrade slings too (Kobashi et al, 2005) • Prior abdomino‐pelvic surgery – Should this contraindicate a tvt sling ? Picture Courtesy M.Walters Neurologic Injury/Pain Obturator Anatomy • Trochar passage retropubically (ilioinguinal nerve branches) esp if too lateral Neuroanatomy • TOT sling passage can injure groin nerves (higher Distances incidence in less obese patients) Post. Ob n. 4.9 cm (3.4-6.5 cm) – Runners Ant. Ob n. 4.8 cm (3.0-6.5 cm) – Athletic patients Device to Post. Ob n. 2.5 cm (1.2-3.5 cm) – Considerations for consent Device to Ant. Ob n. 2.6 cm (1.5-4.5 cm) • TOT (outside in vs inside out): at least transiently, inside out seems to have more pain/neurologic potential abn • Positioning…. Especially if longer case (prolapse etc..) 4 5/23/2012 Nerve & Vascular Injury Management of Nerve Injury S. Pubic Ramus Accessory • Conservative (NSAIDS), rest, time Obturator Vein • Neural pain medications (neurontin etc) Obturator • Pain injections/steroid injections Nerve • Physical therapy Pubocervical • Removal of sling material Fascia – May not help pain External Iliac – May elicit more trauma Vein TVT Needle Picture Courtesy of M. Walters Mesh Related Complications of Mesh Complication Presentation Vaginal Sling Surgery • Extrusion (vaginal exposure) • Extrusion – • Perforation (into urinary tract) Vaginal discharge – Pain – Urethra – Dyspareunia – Bladder • Perforation • Optimal management – Pain – Urinary tract infections – Overactive bladder and irritative LUTS – Obstructive voiding symptoms – hematuria Mesh Exposure from Slings Mesh Extrusion • Management options • Data shows incidence of less than 2% (Abdel‐ – Vaginal estrogens (limited confirmational data) Fattah et al, BJU int, 2006) – Flap coverage (small series of good results) • Most were in ObTape patients • Consent for possible need for repeat management • Etiology – Mesh excision and closure of vaginal walls • Risk of recurrent SUI – Thin flap dissection – Vaginal atrophy – Breakdown of incision lines 5 5/23/2012 Mesh Extrusion “Button‐Hole” Managing Mesh Complications • Reported series are mostly in TOT sling patients • Resolution of mesh exposure may be done • High lateral sulcus with antibiotics and estrogen cream • May elicit pain • Treat in office when mesh exposure is: – Easy to reach and near the introitus – Small and requires minimal excision • Treat in OR if mesh exposure is: – Large and requires reapproximation of mucosa Vaginal Erosions of Mesh are Increasing in Incidence as the Use of Mesh Diagnosis of Mesh Perforation Increases • History: Erosions can be found after: – Pain – Urinary tract infections • Slings – Overactive bladder and irritative LUTS • Abdominal sacral colpopexy (open or – Obstructive voiding symptoms laparoscopic) – hematuria • Cystocele and rectocele repairs • Physical exam (tenderness suburethrally ?) • Tunneller procedures for vaginal apex • Cystoscopy (flexible) bias prolapse • Urodynamics ? Is patient obstructed ? Urethral Perforation/Erosion Erosion into Urethra • Presenting symptoms • Should be noted on may dictate best preop cystoscopy treatment option • Can be managed with – Elderly patient endoscopic rx (not scissors, TUR or Bugbee – Minimal symptoms but rather Holmium – Hematuria laser) – No irritative or • Follow up cysto to obstructive symptoms assure no remaining edges 6 5/23/2012 Perforations/Erosions into Bladder Perforations/Erosions

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    29 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us