Free Fall of a Quantum Many{Body System A. Colcelli,1 G. Mussardo,1 G. Sierra,2 and A. Trombettoni3, 4 1SISSA and INFN, Sezione di Trieste, Via Bonomea 265, I-34136 Trieste, Italy 2Instituto de F´ısica Te´orica, UAM/CSIC, Universidad Aut´onomade Madrid, Madrid, Spain 3CNR-IOM DEMOCRITOS Simulation Center and SISSA, Via Bonomea 265, I-34136 Trieste, Italy 4Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, Italy The quantum version of the free fall problem is a topic usually skipped in undergraduate Quantum Mechanics courses because its discussion would require to deal with wavepackets built on the Airy functions { a notoriously difficult computation. Here, on the contrary, we show that the problem can be nicely simplified both for a single particle and for general many{body systems making use of a gauge transformation of the wavefunction corresponding to a change of the reference frame, from the laboratory frame of reference to the one comoving with the falling system. Within this approach, the quantum mechanics problem of a particle in an external gravitational potential { counterpart of the free fall of a particle in Classical Mechanics each student is used to see from high-school { reduces to a much simpler one where there is no longer gravitational potential in the Schr¨odinger equation. It is instructive to see that the same procedure applies also to many{body systems subjected to a two{body interparticle potential, function of the relative distances between the particles. This topic provides then a handful and pedagogical example of a quantum many{body system whose dynamics can be analytically described in simple terms. I. INTRODUCTION In Classical Mechanics one of the first paradigmatic problems that students encounter in their study is the dynamics of a falling body, i.e. an object pulled down to the ground (e.g. from the Pisa's tower) by the constant force of Earth's gravity. However, amazingly enough, the same problem is rarely discussed in a course of Quantum Mechanics and the reason is due to the sharp contrast of the physical simplicity of the problem and the difficulty of its mathematical description due to how basic Quantum Mechanics courses @ are structured, largely based on the solution of the time-dependent Schr¨odingerequation i = H ~ @t for the wavefunction in terms of the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the time-independent equation H = E . Indeed, in the traditional quantum mechanics approach to the problem of determining the wavefunction at time t, it is necessary to involve the Airy functions and the projection of the wavefunction of the falling body into this set of eigenfunctions. Here we show that an alternative and easier way to deal with the quantum treatment of the problem of the falling body is both pedagogically very simple to introduce and at the same time general enough to be applicable to the single particle case and to general quantum many{body systems. This approach exploits the possibility to perform a gauge transformation of the wavefunction in correspondence to a change of references frames, from the inertial frame of the laboratory to the accelerated frame of the falling body. In the new frame there is of course no longer any gravitational effect and therefore the system appears to be "free", i.e. non subject to the gravity. It is worth to underline that the same method can be applied to study the effect of gravitational force on quantum many{body system where the particles interact via a generic two{body potential of the form V (jrj − rkj). This approach permits to easily reach some interesting results. For instance, as we discuss in the following, the time evolution of interesting observables, such as the variance of the position of a generic falling wavepacket, is the same as the variance of a free wavepacket: the solely effect of arXiv:2009.03744v1 [physics.gen-ph] 29 Jul 2020 gravity shows up in the behaviour of the expectation values of position (and their powers) which, on the other hand, can be obtained instead the classical Newton's second law of motion. This follows from the Ehrenfest theorem, see e.g. [1], covered in all Quantum Mechanics courses, from which we can infer that the momentum of the wavepacket grows (for positive gravitational force, with g < 0) linearly with time, while its position varies quadratically in time. This last fact will be valid for a generic interacting potential in any dimensions and, in this paper, we will focus on the three{ and one{dimensional cases as explanatory examples. We will also show how to get easily the expression of the energy and the total momentum of the falling many{body system using the basic commutation rules taught in a standard course of Quantum Mechanics. Finally, as a last non-trivial example, we show how to put in relation the one{body density matrix of the falling body with the corresponding one of the "free" (although possibly interacting) system, and give a simple relation between the eigenvalues of the two density matrices. 2 풙 푔 푔 FIG. 1: Pictorial visualization of the Einstein's gedankenexperiment. The effect of an inertial force F = −m g in the Einsteinium atom due to the acceleration of the rocket (right side picture) is the same as if the rocket would be at rest on Earth (left side picture). II. THE QUANTUM EINSTEIN'S ROCKET Let us begin by considering the notorious Einstein's gedankenexperiment of a rocket of length L in an empty space (i.e. very far from any other celestial body), and subject to an acceleration equal to m g ' 9:81 . Suppose that inside the rocket there is a single quantum object, e.g. an Einsteinium atom, s2 for which the relevant Schr¨odingerequation is simply @ 2 @2 i χ(x; t) = − ~ + V (x; t) χ(x; t) ; (1) ~@t 2m @x2 r where we've chosen x as the vertical direction along which the rocket is moving, while Vr(x; t) is a potential representing the confining action of the rocket walls during the motion. If we now pass to the t2 reference frame comoving with the rocket, by changing the spatial variable from x to x = x − g , the e 2 Schr¨odingerequation reads @ 2 @2 @ i χ(x; t) = − ~ + V (x) + i g t χ(x; t) ; (2) ~ e 2 r e ~ e @t 2m @xe @xe where the rocket potential in the new reference is denoted by Vr(xe). If we now transform the wavefunction as i m gt g t2 χ(x;e t) ≡ exp xe + χ(x;e t) ; (3) ~ 2 @ 1 we can get rid of the term linear in pb, i.e. in , in Eq. (2) and the Schr¨odingerequation becomes @xe @ 2 @2 i χ(x; t) = − ~ + V (x) + m g x χ(x; t) : (4) ~ e 2 r e e e @t 2m @xe Therefore in the comoving frame of reference, the Einsteinium atom feels the presence of a gravitational force @V F = − = −m g @x 1 For a discussion of the boundary conditions of the wavefunction χ see [2]. 3 pulling it to the ground of the rocket, as sketched in Fig.1. This is essentially the Einstein's equivalence principle, which states that there is no difference between the gravitational and a fictitious force experi- enced by an observer in a non-inertial frame of reference. For a more detailed discussion on the Einstein's equivalence principle in a Quantum Mechanics context see [3]. In the following we are going to discuss how to deal with a Schr¨odingerequation of the form of (4), performing a gauge transformation on the wavefunction to wash away the gravitational potential. Notice that the above derivation can and will be repeated as well for a many{body quantum system made of interacting particles. III. FREE FALL OF A QUANTUM PARTICLE We are interested in studying the Schr¨odingerequation for a particle of mass m subject to a gravitational potential in one dimension (see e.g. [4]): @ 2 @2 i χ(x; t) = − ~ + m g x χ(x; t) ; (5) ~@t 2m @x2 where χ(x; t) is the wavefunction describing the motion of the particle under the force F = −m g, with g the gravity acceleration. This problem can be solved by Fourier transform going to momentum space, as discussed in [5], while other methods of solution, related to the Airy functions, were proposed and discussed in [6{9]. For the solution of the problem relative to a time dependent gravitational force see our recent paper [2]. Gauge Transformation. Let us discuss now the method of solving Eq. (5) by means of a gauge trans- formation of the wavefunction. The starting point is indeed to perform the following gauge transformation on the wavefunction: χ(x; t) ≡ eiθ(x;t) η(ρ(t); t) ; (6) where ρ(t) = x − ξ(t) and ξ(t) and θ(x; t) to be determined. Substituting (6) into (5), we see that, in order to eliminate the external potential term, we need to impose dξ @θ @θ 2 @θ 2 = ~ ; − = ~ + m g x : (7) dt m @x ~ @t 2m @x Assuming the validity of these equations, it is easy to see thtat η(ρ, t) satisfies the Schr¨odingerequation with no external potential but with the new spatial variables, i.e. @ 2 @2 i η(ρ, t) = − ~ η(ρ, t) : (8) ~@t 2 m @ρ2 If we now make the ansatz m dξ θ(x; t) = x + Γ(t) ; (9) ~ dt and we use it in Eq.