Final Hughes River TMDL Report

Final Hughes River TMDL Report

Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Hughes River Watershed, West Virginia USEPA Approved Report September 2018 On the cover: Photos provided by WVDEP Division of Water and Waste Management Hughes River Watershed: TMDL Report CONTENTS Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions ................................................................................ iv Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... vii 1.0 Report Format ....................................................................................................................1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 2.1 Total Maximum Daily Loads ...................................................................................1 2.2 Water Quality Standards ..........................................................................................4 3.0 Watershed Description and Data Inventory....................................................................5 3.1 Watershed Description .............................................................................................5 3.2 Data Inventory .........................................................................................................7 3.3 Impaired Waterbodies ..............................................................................................9 4.0 Biological Impairment and Stressor Identification ......................................................16 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................17 4.2 Data Review ...........................................................................................................17 4.3 Candidate Causes/Pathways...................................................................................17 4.4 Stressor Identification Results ...............................................................................20 5.0 Metals Source Assessment ...............................................................................................23 5.1 Metals Point Sources..............................................................................................23 5.1.1 Non-mining Point Sources .........................................................................25 5.1.2 Construction Stormwater Permits ..............................................................25 5.2 Metals Nonpoint Sources .......................................................................................28 5.2.1 Sediment Sources .......................................................................................29 6.0 Fecal Coliform Source Assessment.................................................................................32 6.1 Fecal Coliform Point Sources ................................................................................32 6.1.1 Individual NPDES Permits ........................................................................32 6.1.2 General Sewage Permits ............................................................................32 6.2 Fecal Coliform Nonpoint Sources .........................................................................34 6.2.1 On-site Treatment Systems ........................................................................34 6.2.2 Urban/Residential Runoff ..........................................................................36 6.2.3 Agriculture .................................................................................................36 6.2.4 Natural Background (Wildlife) ..................................................................36 7.0 Modeling Process .............................................................................................................37 i Hughes River Watershed: TMDL Report 7.1 Model Selection .....................................................................................................37 7.2 Model Setup ...........................................................................................................38 7.2.1 General MDAS Configuration ...................................................................38 7.2.2 Iron and Sediment Configuration...............................................................39 7.2.3 Fecal Coliform Configuration ....................................................................40 7.3 Hydrology Calibration ...........................................................................................41 7.4 Water Quality Calibration ......................................................................................41 7.5 Modeling Technique for Biological Impacts with Sedimentation Stressors .........42 7.6 Allocation Strategy ................................................................................................43 7.6.1 TMDL Endpoints .......................................................................................43 7.6.2 Baseline Conditions and Source Loading Alternatives .............................44 7.7 TMDLs and Source Allocations ............................................................................47 7.7.1 Total Iron TMDLs......................................................................................47 7.7.2 Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs ...............................................................49 7.7.3 Seasonal Variation .....................................................................................49 7.7.4 Critical Conditions .....................................................................................50 7.7.5 TMDL Presentation ...................................................................................50 8.0 TMDL Results ..................................................................................................................51 9.0 Future Growth .................................................................................................................62 9.1 Iron .........................................................................................................................62 9.2 Fecal Coliform Bacteria .........................................................................................63 10.0 Public Participation .........................................................................................................63 10.1 Public Meetings .....................................................................................................63 10.2 Public Notice and Public Comment Period ...........................................................64 10.3 Response Summary ................................................................................................64 11.0 Reasonable Assurance .....................................................................................................65 11.1 NPDES Permitting .................................................................................................65 11.2 Watershed Management Framework Process ........................................................66 11.3 Public Sewer Projects ............................................................................................67 12.0 Monitoring Plan ...............................................................................................................67 12.1 NPDES Compliance...............................................................................................67 12.2 Nonpoint Source Project Monitoring .....................................................................67 12.3 TMDL Effectiveness Monitoring ..........................................................................67 13.0 References .........................................................................................................................68 ii Hughes River Watershed: TMDL Report TABLES Table 2-1. Applicable West Virginia water quality criteria .......................................................... 5 Table 3-1. Modified landuse for the Hughes TMDL watersheds ................................................. 7 Table 3-2. Datasets used in TMDL development ......................................................................... 8 Table 3-3. Waterbodies and impairments for which TMDLs have been developed................... 11 Table 4-1. Biological impacts resolved by implementation of pollutant-specific TMDLs ........ 21 Table 7-1. TMDL endpoints........................................................................................................ 44 Table 8-1. Iron TMDLs ............................................................................................................... 51 Table 8-2. Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs ............................................................................... 58 FIGURES Figure I-1. Examples of a watershed, TMDL watershed, and subwatershed ............................... vi Figure 2-1. Hydrologic groupings of West Virginia’s watersheds ................................................ 3 Figure 3-1. Location of the Hughes River Watershed TMDL Project Area in West Virginia ...... 6 Figure 3-2. Hughes TMDL Watersheds....................................................................................... 10 Figure 4-1. Conceptual model of candidate causes and potential biological effects ................... 19 Figure 5-1. Point sources in the Hughes River Watershed .......................................................... 24 Figure 5-2. Construction

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    78 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us