On the Mechanics Behind Academic Progress

On the Mechanics Behind Academic Progress

On the Mechanics Behind Academic Progress Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) von der KIT-Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (KIT) genehmigte DISSERTATION von B.Sc. Wi.-Ing. Lars Herberholz Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.12.2020 Referent: Professor Dr. Berthold U. Wigger Korreferentin: Professor Dr. Nora Szech Karlsruhe, Dezember 2020 Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................v List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. ix 1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 1 2 Collapsing Stars and the Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge ............................................ 3 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Data and Research Design............................................................................................ 5 2.2.1 Data Compilation ............................................................................................. 5 2.2.2 The Scientific Elite ............................................................................................ 6 2.2.3 Matching Approach ......................................................................................... 9 2.3 Identification of Main Effects ..................................................................................... 13 2.3.1 Outcome Paths .............................................................................................. 13 2.3.2 Econometric Model ....................................................................................... 15 2.3.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Variations over the Scientific Spectrum ..................................................................... 18 2.4.1 Main Field Effects .......................................................................................... 18 2.4.2 Distinct Effect Channels ................................................................................. 22 2.5 Discussion and Conclusion ......................................................................................... 31 3 Efficiency of European Universities: A Case of Apples and Peers ................................. 35 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Related Literature ...................................................................................................... 36 3.3 Clustering Analysis ..................................................................................................... 40 3.3.1 Methodology ................................................................................................. 40 3.3.2 Data and Results ............................................................................................ 41 3.4 Statistical DEA Approach ............................................................................................ 47 3.5 Efficiency Estimation .................................................................................................. 49 3.5.1 Model Specification ....................................................................................... 49 3.5.2 Results ........................................................................................................... 51 3.6 Identification of Efficiency Drivers ............................................................................. 54 3.6.1 Model Specification ....................................................................................... 54 3.6.2 Results ........................................................................................................... 57 3.7 Robustness Analysis ................................................................................................... 59 3.8 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 63 iv Contents 4 Competitive Funding in Academia: Back to the Bags of Gold ....................................... 65 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 65 4.2 Institutional Context and Data ................................................................................... 67 4.3 Determinants of Funding Success .............................................................................. 70 4.3.1 Econometric Foundations .............................................................................. 70 4.3.2 Model Specification ....................................................................................... 72 4.3.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 74 4.4 Discussion and Conclusion ......................................................................................... 79 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 83 References ........................................................................................................................ 85 Appendix A ....................................................................................................................... 99 Appendix B ..................................................................................................................... 125 Appendix C ..................................................................................................................... 135 List of Tables 2.1 Summary Statistics on Treatment Stars .............................................................................. 9 2.2 Summary Statistics on Matched Collaborators ................................................................. 11 2.3 Impact of Star Death on Collaborators’ Output ................................................................ 19 2.4 Impact of Star Death on Collaborators’ Output Beyond Joint Production ........................ 20 2.5 Effect Heterogeneity by Collaboration Frequency ............................................................ 23 2.6 Effect Heterogeneity by Editorial Influence ...................................................................... 24 2.7 Effect Heterogeneity in Geographical Space, Co-location Channel ................................... 26 2.8 Effect Heterogeneity in Subject Space .............................................................................. 27 2.9 Effect Heterogeneity by Collaborator Status ..................................................................... 28 2.10 Effect Heterogeneity in Geographical Space, US Channel ................................................. 30 3.1 Mean Composition of Research Output by Cluster ........................................................... 43 3.2 Summary Statistics by Cluster ........................................................................................... 47 3.3 Summary Statistics on Bias-corrected Efficiency Scores by Cluster .................................. 51 3.4 Mean and Median Bias-corrected Efficiency Scores by Country and Cluster .................... 53 3.5 Description and Summary Statistics on Covariates by Cluster .......................................... 56 3.6 Regression Results ............................................................................................................. 58 3.7 Summary Statistics on Silhouette Coefficients by Cluster ................................................. 60 3.8 Average Peer-group Composition by Cluster, Nearest Neighbourhood Approach ........... 60 3.9 Regression Results, Nearest Neighbourhood Approach .................................................... 61 3.10 Regression Results of Model Variants, Nearest Neighbourhood Approach ...................... 63 4.1 Summary Statistics on Higher Education Institutions ........................................................ 69 4.2 Regression Results ............................................................................................................. 75 4.3 Median Values by Type of Institution ................................................................................ 77 A.1 Classification of Scientific Fields ........................................................................................ 99 A.2 List of Treatment Stars .................................................................................................... 100 A.3 Summary Statistics on Matched Collaborators by Scientific Field ................................... 110 A.4 Robustness Checks .......................................................................................................... 111 A.5 Effect Heterogeneity by Collaboration Recency .............................................................. 116 A.6 Effect Heterogeneity by Collaboration Length ................................................................ 117 A.7 Effect Heterogeneity via Collaborator Status

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    146 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us