On the Dynamics of Some Resonances of Phobos in the Future

On the Dynamics of Some Resonances of Phobos in the Future

A&A 429, 731–738 (2005) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041173 & c ESO 2004 Astrophysics On the dynamics of some resonances of Phobos in the future T. Yokoyama, M. R. Mana, C. do Nascimento, M. T. Santos, and N. Callegari Jr Universidade Estadual Paulista, IGCE-DEMAC Caixa Postal 178,CEP 13.500-970 Rio Claro (São Paulo), Brasil e-mail: [email protected] Received 28 April 2004 / Accepted 8 September 2004 Abstract. A probable capture of Phobos into an interesting resonance was presented in our previous work. With a simple model, considering Mars in a Keplerian and circular orbit, it was shown that once captured in the resonance, the inclination of the satellite reaches very high values. Here, the integrations are extended to much longer times and escape situations are analyzed. These escapes are due to the interaction of new additional resonances, which appear as the inclination starts to increase reaching some specific values. Compared to classical capture in mean motion resonances, we see some interesting differences in this problem. We also include the effect of Mars’ eccentricity in the process of the capture. The role played by this eccentricity becomes important, particularly when Phobos encounters a double resonance at a ≈ 2.619RM. Planetary perturbations acting on Mars and variation of its equator are also included. In general, some possible scenarios of the future of Phobos are presented. Key words. planets and satellites: general – solar system: general 1. Introduction AB5 360 In Yokoyama (2002), hereafter PYO, we showed that in the fu- ture, Phobos will face some interesting resonance because its 2.5 Φ 180 semi major axis a is continuously decreasing due to the ac- tion of tides. This means that the frequencies associated with Inclination the longitude of the node (Ω) and the argument of the peri- 0 0 center (w) are also varying, so that in the neighbourhood of a specific value of the semi major axis, these frequencies can sat- 0 2500 5000 0 2500 5000 Years Years isfy resonant relations like k1Ω+˙ k2w˙ + k3n ≈ 0, where n is the mean motion of the Sun, ki are integers, and dots mean time derivatives. This kind of commensurability is rather dif- C 2.8 D 360 ferent to usual mean motion resonances, since only one mean longitude (the Sun) is involved. Moreover, this mean motion is not affected by the tidal effects. The current semimajor axis (a), 1.4 Φ 180 eccentricity (e) and inclination (I) of Phobos are: a ≈ 2.76RM, Inclination e ≈ 0.015 and I ≈ 1◦, where inclination is referred to Mars’ 0 0 equator and RM is the equatorial radius of Mars. In our previous work we showed that Phobos can be captured in the Ω+˙ 2n 0 4000 8000 0 4000 8000 resonance in the neighbourhood of a = 2.149RM.Eveninthe Y ears Years absence of tides, i.e., for the ordinary restricted three body Fig. 1. Left panels: variation of the inclination for resonant semi major problem, the effect of this resonance is clearly visible. Indeed, axes. Right panels: libration of the resonant argument: Φ=2λ +Ω− taking a ≈ 2.149R and integrating the Cartesian Eqs. (1) as M 3Ω. Initial conditions for the satellite: Top: a = 2.1492RM, e = 0.015, given in PYO (Mars is in a Keplerian orbit), we get Fig. 1. l = w = 0◦, Ω=160◦, = 60◦, Bottom: a = 2.1498, e = 0.015, ◦ The obliquity of the equator is artificially fixed to = 60 l = w = 0◦, Ω=160◦, = 28◦.MarsisassumedinaKeplerianorbit (Panels A, B). For this high value of , the inclination varies with initial conditions: a = 1.5236 AU, e = 0.0933, w = 0◦, Ω=0◦, up to almost 5◦ while for = 28◦ (Panels C, D), the maxi- λ = 0◦, I = . mum inclination is ≈2.73◦. If however the semi major axis a is slightly changed to a = 2.145, the angle Φ=2λ +Ω− 3Ω does not librate any more and the variation of the inclination is Now, let us suppose a case when the semi major axis of negligible. Phobos decreases secularly due to tides and passes through the Article published by EDP Sciences and available at http://www.aanda.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041173 732 T. Yokoyama et al.: On the dynamics of some resonances of Phobos in the future resonant value (a ≈ 2.149). According to Szeto (1983) the the dynamics of the evection is very complex, but as pointed time rate variation of Phobos’ semimajor axis is of the order of out by Touma & Wisdom (1998), capture in this resonance 10−7 cm s−1. The current obliquity of Mars is ≈ 25.19◦,but is always temporary (for tidal dissipative forces). Compared this value is chaotically varying (Ward 1979; Touma & Wisdom to problems involving two mean motion resonance, or evec- 1993; Laskar & Robutel 1993) and over a long time scale it can tion resonances, we show that the dynamics of our resonance sweep a large interval. In particular, in a frequency analysis presents some clear differences in the evolution during the cap- over 45 Myr, Laskar & Robutel (1993) found a chaotic zone ture. of which can range from (0◦ to 60◦). If at the moment when This work is organized in the following way: Sect. 2 shows a ≈ 2.149, the current value of is larger than ≈ 19◦,then some situations of capture and escape. To explain these escapes capture usually occurs and inclination grows secularly to high and to put the problem in a workable form, we still keep Mars’ values, much greater than the present value. As mentioned in equator as the reference plane. The dynamics of the problem PYO, the reason for this large increase is due to the continuous when Mars’ eccentricity is taken into account is described in outward displacement of the libration center (Fig. 2 in PYO) Sect. 3. In Sect. 4 we include the planetary perturbations acting as Phobos’ semi major axis decreases. In PYO we always con- on Mars and also the precessional equations of Mars’ equator. sidered Mars in a circular orbit and integrations were not long Section 5 is devoted to conclusions. enough, so that no escape or possible rupture of the resonance were presented. This time we want to explore some escape sit- 2. Escape from the 2n + Ω˙ resonance uations. This problem was studied by many authors: Beaugé & Ferraz-Mello (1994), Gomes (1995a,b, 1997a,b, 1998), Liou As mentioned before, many authors have studied the phe- & Zook (1997), Hamilton (1994), Jancart et al. (2003), etc. nomenon of capture and escape in resonances involving mean In particular, Gomes has presented a deep study of the phe- motion commensurability. Very roughly speaking, due to the nomenon of resonance lock. He also deduced some interest- dissipative force, the semimajor axis of the perturbed body ing formulae that govern the evolution of the eccentricity, in- varies secularly so that at some moment a particular orbital clination and semi major axis not only in the restricted three resonance involving the mean motions can be satisfied. Then, body problem but in the mutual case as well. Gomes consid- provided that certain conditions are fulfilled (see for instance, ers different kind of dissipative forces; however in all cases Henrard 1982; Peale 1989; Malhotra 1990; Gomes 1995a, the resonance is mainly due to the combination of two mean 1997a, etc.) a capture takes place. Usually, in this case, the longitudes. Therefore, for the restricted three body problem, ratio of semi major axes, or the semi major axis of the per- in general, once a capture takes place, the semi major axis of turbed body (restricted three body problem), stops varying sec- the particle must stop its secular variation and remains librat- ularly. Also, under the capture, a specific angle connected to ing around some resonant value. Depending on the dissipative the current resonance starts to librate, whereas the eccentricity force, the amplitude of the libration of the semi major can ei- or inclination begins to vary secularly. Beaugé & Ferraz-Mello ther decrease to a stationary value (stable lock) or increase be- (1994) showed that in the case of drag forces, the eccentric- yond some tolerable limit (unstable lock), so that the escape ity varies secularly during some time, but after that, it has the is unavoidable and capture is only temporary (Gomes 1995b). tendency to stabilize around a specific value which they called A noteworthy point in the present problem is the resonant an- “universal eccentricity”. In spite of this stabilization, the cap- gle: instead of two mean motions, the resonance comes from ture may not be permanent, that is, if the temporal variation Phobos’ longitude of node and the mean motion of the Sun. of the libration angle increases in amplitude, an escape from Therefore, in opposition to mean motion resonances, in our the resonance will appear and this rupture is essentially due to problem, the satellite remains captured, even if its semi major the unstable character of the resonance lock. Therefore, accord- axis is decreasing (Sect. 3). In PYO we list other similar reso- ing to Gomes (1995b), a resonance lock is stable or unstable nances, e.g., the evection: ˙ − n. Although in our problem we and this stability depends on the particular dissipative force in- are mostly interested in the capture of inclination, it is instruc- volved. A detailed study yielding analytical criteria about the tive to comment briefly on some points related to the dynamics permanency in resonance trapping is given in his paper. of the evection resonance. This commensurability might have Similarly to “universal eccentricity”, the concept of “uni- been important in the past of the Earth-Moon system (Touma & versal inclination” was introduced by Gomes (1997b) consid- Wisdom 1998).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us