Vascular Flora of the Deep Fork River in Okmulgee, Creek and Okfuskee Counties, Oklahoma

Vascular Flora of the Deep Fork River in Okmulgee, Creek and Okfuskee Counties, Oklahoma

Publications of the Oklahoma Biological Survey 2nd Series Volume 6: 15-29, 2005 © Oklahoma Biological Survey, 2005 VASCULAR FLORA OF THE DEEP FORK RIVER IN OKMULGEE, CREEK AND OKFUSKEE COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA Bruce W. Hoagland1, 2, Forrest L. Johnson Oklahoma Biological Survey and 1Department of Geography University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 ABSTRACT.—This paper reports the results of an inventory of the vascular plants on the Deep Fork River in Creek, Okfuskee, and Okmulgee counties. A total of 500 taxa of vascular plant species in 293 genera and 99 families was collected. The largest fam- ilies were the Poaceae (77 species), Asteraceae (58), Cyperaceae (46) and Fabaceae (36). One hundred and thirty-five species were annuals, 11 biennials, and 354 perennials. Seventy-four woody plant species were collected. Thirty-eight exotic species (7.6% of the total flora) were collected. No federally listed threatened or endangered species were found, but eight species tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory were present. INTRODUCTION W and 35.7119° N to 35.6257° N; Figure 1). The EWMA The primary objective of this study was to provide is located in Okmulgee County (35.4745° N - 35.4679° N a comprehensive floristic inventory for resource man- and 95.8789° W - 95.8898° W) and encompasses 2,000 agers at the Deep Fork Wildlife Management Area ha. Both sites are managed by the Oklahoma (DFWMA) and Eufaula Wildlife Management Area, Department of Wildlife Conservation. The study sites Deep Fork Unit (EWMA). Such inventories aid man- are located within the Subtropical Humid (Cf) climate agers in locating populations of sensitive species and zone (Trewartha 1968). Summers are warm (mean July documenting the occurrence of exotic and nuisance temperature = 28.3° C) and humid, and winters are rel- species (Barkley 2000). Ignorance of the presence of atively short and mild (mean January temperature = exotic species can be detrimental to sensitive species 39.5° C). Mean annual precipitation is 105.9 cm, with and/or exert adverse economic impacts (Ertter 2000). periodic severe droughts (Oklahoma Climatological This study is also a contribution toward a compre- Survey 2005). Physiographically, the Deep Fork River hensive inventory of the flora of the Deep Fork River, is located in the Osage Plains section of the Central which is considered to be a significant conservation Lowlands province (Hunt 1974) and within the Eastern area because of extensive wetland habitats associated Sandstone Cuesta Plains province of Oklahoma (Curtis the river (Brabander et al. 1985). A review of records in and Ham 1979). The surface geology consists of the Oklahoma Vascular Plants Database (OVPD) indi- Pennsylvanian sandstones and quaternary alluvium cates that floristic inventory efforts along the Deep (Branson and Johnson 1979). Floodplain soils at the Fork have been sporadic. The earliest botanical collec- DFWMA are predominantly of the Roebuck series, tions date from 2 May 1927 when M. Fielder collected which are poorly drained. Upland soils are members Chaerophyllum procumbens and Erigeron vernus along the of the Stephensville series, medium depth soils over Deep Fork in Oklahoma County (Hoagland et al. 2005). interbedded sandstone and shale and Darnell series, The first specimens (Astranthium integrifolium, Juncus shallow, strongly sloping acid soils over red sandstone effusus, Lepidium virginicum, Nuttallanthus texanus, (Oakes et al. 1959). The predominant soil of the EWMA Plantago virginica, Poa arachnifera, and Rumex hastatulus) is the Verdigris-Lightning-Pulaski association, nearly from the Deep Fork River in Okfuskee County were level, deep, loamy floodplain soils (Sparwasser et al. collected on 20 May 1972. In Okmulgee County, the 1968). However, these soils were altered when reaches first collections were made on 5 April 1956 by H. C. of the Deep Fork in Lincoln County were channelized Pitchford who collected Forestiera acuminata. from 1912 -1923 (Harper 1938, Featherly 1940), result- ing in sediment deposition exceeding 2.1 meters in STUDY AREA some places (Featherly 1940). Potential natural veg- The DFWMA encompasses over 4,816 hectares in etation in the study area includes post oak-blackjack Creek and Okfuskee counties (96.3692° W to 96.6013° forest, bottomland forest, and tallgrass prairie (Duck and Fletcher 1943). 2E-mail: [email protected] 15 16 HOAGLAND AND JOHNSON [POBS, Vol. 6 METHODS The flora of DFWMA was substantially larger than Collection sites were established for intensive EWMA, most likely because of its greater size (Tables 2 floristic sampling following review of U. S. Geological and 3). At DFWMA, 434 taxa of vascular plants in 97 Survey 1:24,000 topographic maps and field reconnais- families and 287 genera were collected. Of the sance. However, collecting was not restricted to these angiosperms, 124 were monocots and 300 were dicots. sites and previously uncollected species were gathered In addition, there were two equisetopyhta, seven pteri- wherever they were encountered. The predominant dophyta, and one gymnosperm. The Poaceae (58), vegetation association at these sites was classified Asteraceae (54), Cyperaceae (39), and Fabaceae (32) according to Hoagland (2000). Inventory took place at had the greatest number of species. The largest genera EWMA from March to October 1996 and DFWMA were Carex (17 species), Dichanthelium (10), Quercus (7), from March to October 1998. Vouchers for exotic and Cyperus (7). One hundred and eleven species were species were made from naturalized populations only, annuals, 7 biennials, and 314 perennials were present thus excluding cultivated and ornamental plants. in the flora. Specimens were processed at the Robert Bebb The total Deep Fork flora included 38 exotic species Herbarium of the University of Oklahoma (OKL) fol- in 12 families, representing 7.6% of the flora. The great- lowing standard procedures. Specimens were identi- est number of exotic species were in the Poaceae (15) fied using Waterfall (1973). Origin, either native or and Fabaceae (10). At DFWMA, there were 28 exotic introduced, was determined using Taylor and Taylor species from 12 families, representing 6% of the flora. (1991) and USDA-NRCS (2005). Nomenclature follows The greatest number of exotic species were in the fam- the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural ilies Poaceae (9), Fabaceae (7), and Polygonaceae (3). Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS 2005). At EWMA, there were 19 exotic species from 7 families, Voucher specimens were deposited at OKL. Tabular representing 11% of the flora. The greatest number of summary of results follow Palmer et al. (1995). exotic species were in the families Poaceae (8), Fabaceae (4), and Polygonaceae (3). Interestingly, the RESULTS AND DISCUSSION greatest number of exotic species were present on the A total of 500 taxa of vascular plants in 99 families smallest of the two sites. and 293 genera was collected at both the DFWMA and Based on floristic inventories from across EWMA (Appendix 1, Table 1). Among the Oklahoma, exotic species constitute 9% - 15% of the angiosperms, 154 were monocots and 336 were dicots. flora (Hoagland and Johnson 2001, Hoagland and In addition, there were two equisetopyhta, seven pteri- Buthod 2003, Hoagland and Buthod 2004, Hoagland dophyta, and one gymnosperm. The Poaceae (77), and Johnson 2004a, Hoagland and Johnson 2004b, Asteraceae (58), Cyperaceae (46), and Fabaceae (36) Hoagland and Wallick 2003, Hoagland et al. 2004a, and had the greatest number of species. The largest genera Hoagland et al. 2004b). An exception comes from two were Carex (23 species), Dichanthelium (11), Cyperus (8), sites in McCurtain County, where exotic species repre- and Juncus (8). One hundred and thirty-five species sented only 6.6% of flora (Hoagland and Johnson were annuals, 11 biennials, and 354 perennials were 2004c). present in the flora. Seventy-five species of woody No federally listed threatened or endangered plant were found, of which 39 were trees, 16 shrubs, species were encountered. However, eight species and 20 woody vines. tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory At the EWMA, 162 taxa of vascular plants in 58 (2005) were present (Table 4). Individuals of each families and 126 genera were collected. Of the tracked species were present at DFWMA, but only angiosperms, 45 were monocots and 115 were dicots. three (Forestiera acuminata, Urtica chamaedryoides, and In addition, two pteridophytes were present. The Vitis rupestris) were located at EWMA. Poaceae (25), Asteraceae (20), and Cyperaceae (11) had Collection sites were located in seven vegetation the greatest number of species. The largest genera associations. A brief description of each follows: were Carex (7 species), and Polygonum (4). Fifty-four 1. Quercus stellata - Quercus marilandica - Carya texana species were annuals, 4 biennials, and 108 perennials forest association were present in the flora. Seventy-four species of This habitat type was present at DFWMA only. woody plant were found, of which 38 were trees, 16 Common associates included Antennaria parlinii, shrubs, and 20 woody vines. Twenty-nine species of Carex albicans, Cercis canadensis, Helianthus hirsutus, woody plant were found, of which 18 were trees, 7 Hypericum hypericoides, Lespedeza procumbens, shrubs, and 4 woody vines. 2005] Flora of the Deep Fork River 17 Luzula bulbosa, Monarda fistulosa, Muhlenbergia sobo- EWMA, thus individual wetland associations were lifera, Passiflora lutea, Prunus mexicana, not distinguished,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us