Christian Nationalism and Opposition to Stricter Gun Laws

Christian Nationalism and Opposition to Stricter Gun Laws

SRDXXX10.1177/2378023118790189SociusWhitehead et al. 790189research-article2018 Original Article Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World Volume 4: 1 –13 © The Author(s) 2018 Gun Control in the Crosshairs: Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Christian Nationalism and DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118790189 10.1177/2378023118790189 Opposition to Stricter Gun Laws srd.sagepub.com Andrew L. Whitehead1 , Landon Schnabel2 , and Samuel L. Perry3 Abstract Despite increasingly frequent mass shootings and a growing dissatisfaction with current gun laws, American opposition to federal gun legislation remains strong. The authors show that opposition to stricter gun control is closely linked to Christian nationalism, a religious cultural framework that mandates a symbiotic relationship between Christianity and civil society. Using data from a national population-based survey, the authors show that Christian nationalism is an exceptionally strong predictor of opposition to the federal government’s enacting stricter gun laws. Of all the variables considered, only general political orientation has more predictive power than Christian nationalism. The authors propose that the gun control debate is complicated by deeply held moral and religious schemas that discussions focused solely on rational public safety calculations do not sufficiently address. For the substantial proportion of American society who are Christian nationalists, gun rights are God given and sacred. Consequently, attempts to reform existing gun laws must attend to the deeper cultural and religious identities that undergird Americans’ beliefs about gun control. Keywords guns, gun control, Christian nationalism, religion, United States Despite declines in violent crime including homicide for the granted by God to all Americans as our American birthright past three decades, mass shootings have climbed (Arthur [emphasis added]. (C-SPAN 2018) 2017; Federal Bureau of Investigation 2013; Follman, Aronsen, and Pan 2018; Smith and Cooper 2013). The rise in LaPierre’s speech at the Conservative Political Action mass shootings spiked in 2017, with 13 mass shootings in Con ference is only the most recent invocation of a long- which 138 people were killed. Recent mass shootings have standing belief that the right to bear arms is God given, prompted growing dissatisfaction with current gun laws and guaranteed by the divinely inspired founding documents of renewed debate about gun control (Brenan 2018). Calls for this country (Barton 2000).1 Claiming that the U.S. stronger gun control have met strong reactions from gun Constitution was inspired by God serves to elevate the rights advocates, often framed in terms of Americans’ consti- gun, and the right to own it, to a sacred status bestowed by tutional, and perhaps even God-given, right to bear arms. a Christian God. Following the shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, on February 14, 2018, Wayne LaPierre, 1References to the divine in the founding documents may have been executive vice president of the National Rifle Association, more deist than theist, but Christian nationalists today interpret claimed that the right to bear arms was bestowed upon Americans by God: 1Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA 2Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA The genius of those documents, the brilliance of America, of our 3University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA country itself, is that all of our freedoms in this country are for Corresponding Author: every single citizen. And there is no greater personal, individual Andrew L. Whitehead, Clemson University, 132 Brackett Hall, Clemson, freedom than the right to keep and bear arms, the right to protect SC 29634, USA. yourself, and the right to survive. It is not bestowed by man, but Email: [email protected] Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). 2 Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World In addition to stating that the right to own firearms is God Other work similarly highlights the cultural power of the gun given, gun advocates have also claimed that it is the break- as a symbolic object entangled with notions of what it means down of Christian values, not easy access to firearms, that to be a “true” American (Baker 2005; Carlson 2015; Mencken drives gun violence. The week after the Parkland school and Froese 2017). shooting, Florida’s House of Representatives passed a mea- Religion in America has a complex relationship with sure (97-10) requiring public schools to post the state motto, gun ownership, attitudes toward gun ownership, and stances “In God We Trust,” in a “conspicuous place” (Solochek on gun control legislation that varies depending on what 2018). Kim Daniels, a Democrat who sponsored the bill, said aspects of religion are under consideration. Yamane (2016) that “the real thing that needs to be addressed are issues of the showed that although theologically conservative Americans heart” and that “he [God] is the light, and our schools need are more likely to own handguns, the religiously active are light in them like never before.” Despite later action, at that less likely to do so. He also found that evangelical Protestants, time these Florida legislators refused to consider gun control compared with mainline Protestants, are more likely to own legislation (36-71) (Andrews 2018).2 Shortly thereafter, the handguns (also see Stroope and Tom 2017). Further demon- Alabama state senate passed a bill allowing the display of the strating the complex relationship between religion and guns, Ten Commandments on public property and in public schools. Mencken and Froese (2017) found a curvilinear relation- Gerald Dial, the Republican state senator who has proposed ship between church attendance and the degree of empow- this bill for several years, remarked, “I believe that if you had erment gun owners derive from owning guns. They also the Ten Commandments posted in a prominent place in found that self-estimated religiosity is negatively related to school, it has the possibility to prohibit some student from gun empowerment and positively associated with support taking action to kill other students” (Brownlee 2018). Similar of various gun control measures. to Florida, the Alabama state senate had no plans to consider The literature has consistently demonstrated the impor- a gun control measure at that time. tance of religion but has not yet grappled with a distinct reli- For many Americans, the gun control debate is not merely gious disposition potentially implicated in the belief that about a secular public safety issue but is instead deeply guns are a God-given right to Americans in a Christian coun- entwined with what are perceived as the God-given rights of try with an unraveling moral fabric. The framework used by the American public and a purported breakdown of the moral LaPierre and those sponsoring legislation in Florida and fabric of American society. We propose, therefore, that a dis- Alabama cannot merely be attributed a specific religious tra- tinct cultural style of religiosity, Christian nationalism, may dition or religious behavior. Instead, their entrenched opposi- be a key determinant of American opposition to gun control. tion to gun control is grounded in a particular symbolic system about the role of Christianity in the public sphere. In Religion and the Sacred Gun their study on adolescent access to in-home firearms, Stroope and Tom (2017) proposed that their findings about conserva- Recent research highlights the symbolic significance of the tive Protestants’ being more likely to have guns in the home gun in U.S. culture. Mencken and Froese (2017), for exam- could be due to conservative Protestants’ greater belief that ple, showed how the gun operates as a source of identity for the United States is a Christian nation established on, among certain segments of American society, particularly white men other things, the right to bear arms. Because of data limita- who have experienced economic distress (also see Carlson tions, Stroope and Tom were unable to directly test this cul- 2015). They argued that the gun provides moral and emo- tural mechanism. However, their suggestion that a symbolic tional support, bestowing a sense of empowerment for a sub- entanglement of Christianity and nationalism shapes some group of Americans who “root their identity, morality, and Americans’ approach to guns deserves further attention patriotism in gun ownership” (Mencken and Froese 2017:22). given some people’s apparent intransigence toward any form of gun control legislation to address rising mass shootings. It references to the divine as necessarily Christian, conveniently is possible, therefore, that for some people gun control is not ignoring the influence of Enlightenment deism on the founding a simple matter of calculated public safety but instead a sym- fathers (Barton 2000; Fea 2011). Perhaps ironically, proponents bolic battleground. For them, gun control is a direct attack on of the “Christian nation” narrative at the time of the founding a God-given right, and mass shootings are the result not of fathers opposed the Constitution because it was viewed as godless easy access to firearms but instead of the moral decay of (Lambert 2003, 2008). Today, however, proponents of the Christian what should be a Christian nation. nation narrative go to great lengths to underscore the influence of the Christian God on the Constitution. 2On March 9, Florida governor Rick Scott signed into law a bill Christian Nationalism and Gun Control that raises the minimum buying age to 21 years, mandates a three- day waiting period for more gun purchases, and gives police broad Recent research highlights the societal implications of cul- powers to confiscate guns from persons deemed to be a threat.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us