DENNING ECOLOGY of Conepatus Chinga (CARNIVORA: MEPHITIDAE) in a GRASSLAND RELICT of CENTRAL ARGENTINA

DENNING ECOLOGY of Conepatus Chinga (CARNIVORA: MEPHITIDAE) in a GRASSLAND RELICT of CENTRAL ARGENTINA

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CONICET Digital Mastozoología Neotropical, 20(2):373-379, Mendoza, 2013 Copyright ©SAREM, 2013 Versión impresa ISSN 0327-9383 http://www.sarem.org.ar Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 Nota DENNING ECOLOGY OF Conepatus chinga (CARNIVORA: MEPHITIDAE) IN A GRASSLAND RELICT OF CENTRAL ARGENTINA Diego F. Castillo, Estela M. Luengos Vidal, Nicolás C. Caruso, Mauro Lucherini, and Emma B. Casanave Grupo de Ecología Comportamental de Mamíferos (GECM) – Laboratorio de Fisiología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina [Correspondence: Diego F. Castillo <[email protected]>]. ABSTRACT. In order to investigate the factors affecting den site selection in Conepatus chinga, we identified and characterized 199 (males: n = 108, females: n = 91) dens used by 7 radio-tracked skunks from August 2002 to October 2005 in a protected area of the Argentine Pampas grassland. Skunks frequently reused dens (25.1%), without significant differences between sexes. Although C. chinga are solitary animals, our data indicate that males and females may be able to share dens, presumably in the breeding season. Den sites were not homoge- neously distributed within an animal’s home range, being the density in core areas greater than in middle and border regions of home ranges. This study confirmed that C. chinga selects specific habitat characteristics for its den sites and suggests that the access to prey is a major factor in their selection. RESUMEN. Uso y selección de madrigueras por parte de Conepatus chinga (Mephitidae) en un relicto de pastizal pampeano del centro de Argentina. Para investigar los factores que afectan la selección de madri- gueras de Conepatus chinga, identificamos y caracterizamos 199 (machos: n = 108, hembras: = 91) madrigueras utilizadas por siete zorrinos equipados con radiotransmisores en el periodo comprendido entre agosto de 2002- octubre de 2005, en un área protegida en los pastizales pampeanos de Argentina. Frecuentemente los zorrinos reutilizaron sus madrigueras (25,1%), sin encontrarse diferencias significativas entre ambos sexos. Aunque los zorrinos comunes son considerados animales solitarios nuestros resultados indican que tanto machos como hembras pueden compartir las madrigueras, presumiblemente en la época de apareamiento. Las madrigueras no estuvieron homogéneamente distribuidas dentro de las áreas de acción de los zorrinos, con mayor densidad en las áreas núcleo que en las regiones medias y externas de las áreas de acción. Este estudio confirma que C. chinga selecciona hábitats específicos para sus madrigueras y sugiere que el acceso a las presas es el principal factor que determina esta selección. Key words: Habitat selection. Molina’s hog-nosed skunk. Radiotelemetry. Palabras clave: Radiotelemetría. Selección de hábitat. Zorrino común. Recibido 8 enero 2013. Aceptado 15 julio 2013. Editor asociado: AE Farias 374 Mastozoología Neotropical, 20(2):373-379, Mendoza, 2013 DF Castillo et al. http://www.sarem.org.ar Suitable den sites are a basic habitat require- southern Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Its ment for skunks (Mephitidae, Carnivora) altitude ranges from 450 m to 1172 m asl. The (Bixler and Gittleman, 2000; Lesmeister et al., climate is temperate with mean 500-800 mm 2008). Skunks use dens to shelter from inclem- annual precipitation. Its vegetation is character- ent weather (Hwang et al., 2007; Cantú Salazar ized by native grassland but introduced tree/ et al., 2009) and predators (Cantú Salazar et shrub patches are also frequent (Zalba and al., 2009; Castillo et al., 2011a); moreover, dens Villamil, 2002). are the site of birth and early maternal care of We spotlighted skunks from a vehicle and offspring (Rosatte and Larivière; 2003; Castillo, restrained them manually (Castillo et al., 2011). Selection of habitats surrounding dens 2011b). Captured individuals were chemically may influence den use, because it may affect immobilized (Castillo et al., 2012). Healthy safety from predators or disturbance (Grand, adult animals were fitted with radiocollars 2002; Mitchell and Lima, 2002; Spencer, 2002) and monitored during discontinuous tracking and access to food resources (Rubin et al., 2002; sessions. Successive locations with a minimum Lyons et al., 2003; Castillo et al., 2011a), so interval of 2 h between them were considered understanding the factors that influence den se- as biologically independent (Castillo et al., lection is valuable for the species management. 2011b). Den sites were located via “homing Although it is one of the most widespread in” (following increasing intensity of radiocol- South American mammals, little is known lar signal until the den was identified; White about the biology and ecology of the Molina´s and Garrott, 1990). Because C. chinga activity hog-nosed skunk Conepatus chinga (Molina, is mostly nocturnal (Castillo, 2011) all the 1782). A previous study showed that C. chinga sites where a skunk remained inactive during selected specific habitat characteristics (i.e., the day were considered occupied dens for patches with tall grasses) for their den sites the purposes of this study (Doty and Dowler, in a farmland area. Two major factors were 2006). Den structures were categorized as ei- proposed to explain these selections: predation ther underground or above-ground burrows. risk and access to food (Castillo et al., 2011a). Dimensions (width and height) of entrances To test these two hypotheses we predict that if were recorded when possible. access to food is an important driver of dens We calculated the 99% fixed Kernel method site selection, dens would be concentrated in (Worton, 1989) to build the home range from the most productive habitat. Specifically, we all locations of each skunk. Home ranges were expect that skunks select for their dens the then divided into core (delimited by the 45% habitat where their prey items (i.e., scorpions, Kernel), middle (45% to 80%) and border and larvae of Lepidoptera and Coleoptera; region (the area occupied by the 20% most Castillo, 2011) are most abundant. Alternatively, external locations). Ranges V (Kenward and if the risk of predation is the major factor af- Hodder, 1996) software was used for all these fecting den site selection, we may expect dens analyses. We calculated the densities of dens to be concentrated in the habitat offering the in border, middle and core areas of the home greatest vegetation cover. In this study, we range for each skunk by dividing the number collected data on denning habits, particularly of dens in each region by its area (Jordan et al., den site selection and use by radio-collared 2007). To test our predictions, we used Google C. chinga in a protected area located in the Earth satellite imageries to classify the area into Pampas grasslands of Argentina. 4 exclusive habitat types: (1) High rocky cover- The Ernesto Tornquist Provincial Park age area (HRA), steep areas characterized by (henceforward ETPP) preserves one of the last the presence of consolidated rock with shallow fragments of the native Pampas grassland, the canyons; (2) Low rocky coverage area (LRA), most populated and degraded ecoregion in areas with moderate slopes where rock out- Argentina (Bertonatti and Corcuera, 2000). crops are isolated; (3) Woodland: a wood patch This 6700 ha protected area is located in the composed by introduced trees (predominantly central part of the Ventania mountain range, Pinus sp. and Eucalyptus sp.); in this habitat the DENNING ECOLOGY OF MOLINA’S HOG-NOSED SKUNK 375 density of feral horses was high; (4) Grassland: area: Coleoptera, Coloptera larvae, Lepidoptera a fenced area, where horses were excluded and larvae, and scorpions, which totaled 69.2% of grasses (predominantly Paspalum quadrifarium) the ingested items (Castillo, 2011). were denser and taller than in the remaining To examine the relationship between den habitats. In both rocky areas the vegetation site location and selected landscape features, was dominated by herbaceous species (genera we used ArcView 9.3® to calculate distances Grindelia and Festuca) and the shrub Discaria (m) from each den site to the nearest stream longispina (Zalba and Villamil, 2002) whose and grassland. We determined the same height and density were negatively influenced distances for uniformly distributed random by the presence of large numbers of feral horses points (generated in equal number to dens) (Scorolli et al., 2006). and investigated differences between den sites Habitat selection was evaluated using com- and random points with Student’s t-tests. For positional analysis (Aitchison, 1986). Habitat all statistical procedures we used SPSS software availability within the home range (100% (SPSS Inc. 2008) and P ≤ 0.05 values were Minimum Convex Polygon) and proportional considered significant. utilization (dens) by each animal were first We identified and characterized a total of 199 converted to log-transformed ratios. Compo- (males: n = 108, females: n = 91) den sites of 7 sitional analysis employs radiocollared animals C. chinga (3 males and 4 females) that were ra- as sampling units, and considers all habitat diotracked from August 2002 to October 2005. types simultaneously. Because the minimum Most used dens were found in above-ground number of individuals for statistical inference burrows (n = 170, 85.4 %) and the dimensions from compositional analyses is six (Aebischer of their entrances (n = 77) were (X ± SD) 21.5 et al., 1993), the sexes were pooled. When a ± 9 cm (height) and 25.7 ±1 0.6 cm (width). habitat was available but not used or when it On average, 25.1% of den sites were reused was neither used nor available, a value of 0.01% by skunks (males: 23.1%, females: 27.4%). We was assigned to it, a substitution that does not observed that studied animals reused den sites affect the outcome of the category rankings for a mean of 2.6 (± 0.4, SD) times without (Aebischer et al., 1993). In agreement with significant differences between sexes (males: Johnson (1980), we defined habitat selection as 2.53 ± 0.17, females: 2.64 ± 0.4; t = 0.43, df = 5, the disproportionate use of a habitat relative to p = 0.68).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us