Math 371 Lecture #36 §8.1 (Ed.2), 9.1 (Ed.3): Direct Products

Math 371 Lecture #36 §8.1 (Ed.2), 9.1 (Ed.3): Direct Products

Math 371 Lecture #36 x8.1 (Ed.2), 9.1 (Ed.3): Direct Products We take another step in the classification of groups by way of products of normal sub- groups. Example. The abelian group U15 = f1; 2; 4; 7; 8; 11; 13; 14g has two (normal) subgroups M = f1; 11g and N = f1; 2; 4; 8g. The \product" MN consists of all products mn where m 2 M and n 2 N. We have M ⊆ MN because m = m1 for all m 2 M, and N ⊆ MN because n = 1n for all n 2 N. Do 7; 13; 14 2 MN? Yes, because 11 · 2 = 7, 11 · 8 = 13, and 11 · 4 = 14. Thus U15 = MN, the \product" of two normal subgroups of U15. Notice that every element of U15 can be written uniquely in the form mn for m 2 M and n 2 N. Are the normal subgroups M and N of U15 isomorphic to quotient groups of U15? Since M \ N = f1g and both M and N are normal, we have by the Second Isomorphism Theorem that ∼ ∼ ∼ ∼ M = M=(M \ N) = NM=N = U15=N; N = N=(N \ M) = MN=M = U15=M: ∼ This says that U15=N × U15=M = M × N. ∼ Could it happen that U15 = M × N, the Cartesian product of two normal subgroups? The table for M × N is · (1; 1) (1; 2) (1; 4) (1; 8) (11; 1) (11; 2) (11; 4) (11; 8) (1; 1) (1; 1) (1; 2) (1; 4) (1; 8) (11; 1) (11; 2) (11; 4) (11; 8) (1; 2) (1; 2) (1; 4) (1; 8) (1; 1) (11; 2) (11; 4) (11; 8) (11; 1) (1; 4) (1; 4) (1; 8) (1; 1) (1; 2) (11; 4) (11; 8) (11; 1) (11; 2) (1; 8) (1; 8) (1; 1) (1; 2) (1; 4) (11; 8) (11; 1) (11; 2) (11; 4) (11; 1) (11; 1) (11; 2) (11; 4) (11; 8) (1; 1) (1; 2) (1; 4) (1; 8) (11; 2) (11; 2) (11; 4) (11; 8) (11; 1) (1; 2) (1; 4) (1; 8) (1; 1) (11; 4) (11; 4) (11; 8) (11; 1) (11; 2) (1; 4) (1; 8) (1; 1) (1; 2) (11; 8) (11; 8) (11; 1) (11; 2) (11; 4) (1; 8) (1; 1) (1; 2) (1; 4) Could the function f : M × N ! MN given by f(m; n) = mn be an isomorphism? We will answer this question in a moment in a more general setting which we now describe. The Cartesian product of groups G1;G2;:::;Gn, denoted by G1 × G2 × · · · × Gn, consists of n-tuples (a1; a2; : : : ; an) for ai 2 Gi, equipped with the component operation (a1; a2; : : : ; an)(b1; b2; : : : ; bn) = (a1b1; a2b2; : : : ; anbn): Technically, each Gi is NOT a subgroup of the direct product G1 × G2 × · · · × Gn (but each Gi is isomorphic to the subgroup of G1 × G2 × · · · × Gn). Observe that if all of G1;G2;:::;Gn are finite groups, then the order of G1 ×G2 ×· · ·×Gn is the the product of the orders of G1;G2;:::;Gn. Should G1;G2;:::;Gn happen to be normal subgroups of a group G, we can consider the normal subgroup G1G2 ··· Gn that consists of products of the form a1a2 ··· an in G for ai 2 Gi, i = 1; 2; : : : ; n. Lemma 9.2. Let M and N be normal subgroups of a group G. If M \ N = feg, then ab = ba for all a 2 M and all n 2 N. Proof. Let a 2 M and b 2 N. The goal is to show that ab = ba. Since M is normal, we have that b−1ab 2 M. Since a−1 2 M we have that a−1b−1ab 2 M. Similarly, by the normality of N we have that a−1b−1a 2 N, so that a−1b−1ab 2 N. −1 −1 Since M \ N = feg, we obtain a b ab = e, and hence ab = ba. Theorem 9.1. Let N1;N2;:::;Nk be normal subgroups of a group G such that every element in G can be written uniquely in the form a1a2 ··· ak for ai 2 Ni, i = 1; 2; : : : ; k. Then G is isomorphic to the direct product N1 × N2 × · · · × Nk. Proof. We define the map f : N1 × N2 × · · · × Nk ! G by f(a1; a2; : : : ; ak) = a1a2 ··· ak: The map f is surjective because by hypothesis, each element of G can be written in the form a1a2 ··· ak for some ai 2 Ni, i = 1; 2; : : : ; k. The map f is injective because when f(a1; a2; : : : ; ak) = f(b1; b2; : : : ; bk), we obtain that a1a2 ··· ak = b1b2 ··· bk, so that by the uniqueness of writing each element of G as a product, we have a1 = b1, a2 = b2,..., ak = bk. Before we show that f is a homomorphism, we show for i 6= j that Ni \ Nj = feg. To do this we take a 2 Ni \ Nj, which a can be written as product of elements of N1;N2;:::;Nk in two different ways: a = e ··· e a e ··· e e e ··· e """" N1 Ni Nj Nk a = e ··· e e e ··· e a e ··· e """" N1 Ni Nj Nk Uniqueness of writing a as a product of the elements of Ni implies that a = e, so that Ni \ Nj = feg. By Lemma 9.2, we then have that aibj = bjai for all ai 2 Ni and bj 2 Nj when i 6= j. Repeated using this commutativity we show that f is a homomorphism: f((a1; a2; : : : ; ak)(b1; b2; : : : ; bk)) = f(a1b1; a2b2; : : : ; akbk) = a1b1a2b2 ··· akbk = a1a2b1b2 ··· akbk = a1a2 ··· akb1b2 ··· bk = f(a1; a2; : : : ; ak)f(b1; b2; : : : ; bk): Therefore f : N1 × N2 × · · · × Nk ! G is an isomorphism. Definitions. Suppose that normal subgroups N1;N2;:::;Nk of a group G have the property that every element of G can be written uniquely in the form a1a2 ··· ak for ai 2 Ni, i = 1; 2; : : : ; k. Then G = N1N2 ··· Nk and we say that G is an internal direct product of N1;N2;:::;Nk. By Theorem 9.1, the internal direct product N1N2 ··· Nk is isomorphic to N1 ×N2 ×· · ·× Nk, and we say that G is the external direct product of N1;N2;:::;Nk. Each normal subgroup Ni in the internal or external direct product is called a direct factor of G. Theorem 9.3. If M and N are normal subgroups of a group G such that G = MN and M \ N = feg, then G ∼= M × N where M ∼= G=N and N ∼= G=M. Proof. Suppose every element of G is of the form mn for m 2 M and n 2 N. We want to show that this form mn is unique, so suppose mn = m1n1 for some m1 2 M and n1 2 N. −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 Then m1 mn = m1 m1n1 = n1, and so n1n = m1 mnn = m1 m. −1 −1 Since M and N are subgroups, we have m1m 2 M and n1n 2 N, −1 −1 −1 −1 Since m1 m = n1n and M \ N = feg, then m1 m = e and n1n = e, and hence m1 = m and n1 = n. Thus every element of G can be written uniquely as mn for m 2 M and n 2 N. Since M and N are normal subgroups of G, Theorem 9.1 implies that G ∼= M × N. Because M\N = feg, the Second Isomorphism Theorem implies that M ∼= M=(M\N) ∼= ∼ ∼ MN=N = G=N and N = N=(M \ N) = MN=M = G=M. In practice we typically identity the exterior direct product and the interior direct product because they are isomorphic. Example (Continued). The group U15 = f1; 2; 4; 7; 8; 11; 13; 14g has two normal subgroups M = f0; 11g and N = f1; 2; 4; 8g. Because G = MN and M \ N = feg, we have by Theorem 9.3 that G ∼= M × N. ∼ ∼ ∼ Since M = Z2 and N = Z4, we have that U15 = Z2 × Z4. The group Z2 × Z4 is one of five isomorphism classes of groups of order 8..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us