Vonoprazan Versus Lansoprazole in the Treatment of Artificial Gastric Ulcers After Endoscopic Submucossal Dissection

Vonoprazan Versus Lansoprazole in the Treatment of Artificial Gastric Ulcers After Endoscopic Submucossal Dissection

Kawai et al. BMC Gastroenterol (2021) 21:236 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01822-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Vonoprazan versus lansoprazole in the treatment of artifcial gastric ulcers after endoscopic submucossal dissection: a randomized, open-label trial Daisuke Kawai, Ryuta Takenaka*, Mikako Ishiguro, Shotaro Okanoue, Tatsuhiro Gotoda, Yoshiyasu Kono, Koji Takemoto, Hirofumi Tsugeno and Shigeatsu Fujiki Abstract Background: Vonoprazan is more potent and longer acting than traditional proton pump inhibitor. Although vono- prazan is expected to be superior to proton pump inhibitor, its efcacy in the treatment of gastric ulcers following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efective- ness of vonoprazan in artifcial ulcer healing following ESD. Methods: Patients with gastric tumors were randomly assigned to the vonoprazan group (group V) or lansoprazole group (group L) after ESD. Patients received intravenous lansoprazole (30 mg) twice on the day of ESD. Thereafter, patients were treated with vonoprazan (20 mg/day) in group V or lansoprazole (30 mg/day) in group L. Esophagogas- troduodenoscopy was performed 4 and 8 weeks after the ESD. Results: A total of 168 patients were analyzed. The 4-week healing rate for artifcial ulcer was not signifcantly higher in group V versus group L (17/85, 20.0% vs. 14/83, 16.9%, respectively). In addition, there were no signifcant difer- ences between the 4-week shrinkage rates between the two groups. Postoperative bleeding occurred in none of the patients in group V and three in group L. One patient in group V presented delayed perforation 2 days after ESD. Conclusions: Vonoprazan might not be superior to lansoprazole in the healing of artifcial gastric ulcer after ESD. Trial registration: University hospital Medical Information Network (registration number: UMIN000016642), Registered 27 February 2015, https:// www. umin. ac. jp/ ctr/ index-j. htm. Keywords: Vonoprazan, Lansoprazole, Postoperative bleeding, Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Gastric neoplasm Background as bleeding and perforation [5]. Conventional proton Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been widely used for treat- cancer has been widely accepted and is a well-established ing ESD-induced gastric ulcers. Although PPIs support procedure in Eastern and Western countries [1–4]. ESD to heal such lesions, some ulcers fail to heal; therefore, a provides higher rate of en bloc and R0 resection rate, but more efective therapy is warranted. is occasionally associated with some complications, such Vonoprazan is a novel suppressant of gastric acid secre- tion and an active potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) [6]. Similar to PPIs, P-CABs inhibit gastric H / *Correspondence: [email protected] + Department of Gastroenterology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, 1756, Kawasaki, K+-ATPase. Unlike PPIs, P-CABs inhibit the enzyme in Tsuyama, Okayama 708-0841, Japan a K+-competitive and reversible manner. Te inhibitory © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ publi cdoma in/ zero/1. 0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Kawai et al. BMC Gastroenterol (2021) 21:236 Page 2 of 6 efect of vonoprazan on gastric acid secretion is largely unafected by ambient pH. Terefore, vonoprazan is more potent with a more long-lasting efect than that of PPIs [7, 8]. Vonoprazan is expected to be superior to PPIs, and lead to earlier healing of ESD-induced gastric ulcers versus conventional PPI-based therapy. How- ever, its efcacy in treating these ulcers remains unclear. Hence, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the efective- ness of vonoprazan in healing artifcial ulcers after ESD. Fig. 1 Study protocol. ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy; group V, vonoprazan group; group Methods L, lansoprazole; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; i.v., intravenous injection Tis study was a prospective, single-center, randomized, Flow chart of patients. ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection open-label controlled trial (RCT). Te study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Japan and registered with the Univer- rate was defned as [1-(the ulcer index)/(the ESD ulcer sity hospital Medical Information Network (URL: https:// index)] × 100 (%). www. umin. ac. jp/ ctr/ index-j. htm; registration number: Te primary endpoint was the healing rate of the artif- UMIN000016642). Written informed consent was pro- cial ulcer at 4 weeks after ESD. Te secondary endpoints vided by each patient. were: the healing rate at 8 weeks; shrinkage rates of the Patients with gastric tumors were enrolled between artifcial ulcers at 4 and 8 weeks; and complications, such April 2015 and December 2017. Inclusion criteria for as post-operative bleeding and delayed perforation. ESD were as follows: diferentiated mucosal cancers with- Te healing rate of ulcers after the 4-week administra- out ulceration regardless of the lesion’s size; diferentiated tion of PPIs was reported as 11–35% [11, 12]. Accord- mucosal cancers ≤ 30 mm with ulcer fndings; mucosal ing to our previous data, the healing rate after a 4-week cancers with undiferentiated histology ≤ 20 mm with- administration of PPIs was 24%. A 20% improvement out ulceration; adenoma suspicious for mucosal cancers; observed following the administration of vonoprazan was and neuroendocrine tumors grade 1 ≤ 10 mm confned to considered clinically efective. It was estimated that 82 submucosal layer. Te exclusion criteria were: remnant cases were required in each group to have a power of 80% stomach, administration of antithrombotic agents, non- for detection of a diference at an α = 0.05 level of signif- steroidal anti-infammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and ster- cance using Fisher’s exact test. Assuming a study drop- oids; occurrence of complication during ESD; allergy to out rate of approximately 10%, 90 cases were enrolled in lansoprazole or vonoprazan; and unwillingness to partici- each group. pate in the study. Following ESD, patients were randomly Diferences between the two groups were determined assigned to the vonoprazan group (group V) or the lan- using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test for dis- soprazole group (group L) through the minimization continuous variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for method using Kullback–Leibler divergence [9]. Te ESD continuous variables. Statistical analyses were performed ulcer index was used to balance continuous variables. On with the JMP (version 13) software package (SAS Insti- the day of ESD, patients received 30 mg of lansoprazole tute, Cary, NC, USA). P-values < 0.05 denoted statistically twice intravenously. From postoperative day 2, patients in signifcant diferences between groups. groups V and L received 20 mg/day of vonoprazan and 30 mg/day of lansoprazole for 8 weeks, respectively. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed 4 and Results 8 weeks after the ESD (Fig. 1). During the follow-up Of the 263 patients who underwent gastric ESD from endoscopy, the artifcial ulcer was evaluated using a gas- April 2015 to December 2017, 182 patients (90 in group tric ulcer stage system [10], and the length and width of V and 92 in group L) were eligible to participate in the the artifcial ulcer were evaluated with measure forceps study. Fourteen patients were excluded during follow-up (M2-2C, M2-3U or M2-4K, Olympus Co, Japan). Te mainly because of complications or the need for addi- ulcer healing was defned as scarring at S1 or S2. Te ESD tional surgery. Finally, 85 and 83 patients were allocated ulcer index was calculated by multiplying the length by to group V and group L, respectively (Fig. 3). Te age, the width of the resected specimen (Fig. 2A). Te 4- and gender, status of Helicobacter pylori infection, tumor 8-week ulcer indices were also calculated by multiply- location, and ESD ulcer index of the two groups did not ing the length by the width of the artifcial ulcer at 4 and difer signifcantly (Table 1). Te 4-week healing rate of 8 weeks after ESD, respectively (Fig. 2B). Te shrinking artifcial ulcers was not signifcantly higher in group V Kawai et al. BMC Gastroenterol (2021) 21:236 Page 3 of 6 Fig. 2 A The ESD ulcer index is calculated by multiplying the length (a) by the width (b) of the resected specimen. B The 4- and 8-week ulcer indices were calculated by multiplying the length (c) by the width (d) of the artifcial ulcer at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively Fig. 3 Flow chart of patients. ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection Kawai et al.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us