A Political Libel Suit

A Political Libel Suit

Denver Law Review Volume 3 Issue 9 Article 5 August 2021 A Political Libel Suit Denver Bar Association Record Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/dlr Recommended Citation A Political Libel Suit, 3 Denv. B.A. Rec. 10 (1926). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Denver Law Review at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE DENVER BAR ASSOCIATION RECORD derer was awaiting trial, so the Judge except to verify his reputation as a instructed the clerk to enter an order poker player. He and Senator Riddle- of adjournment sine die as soon as he burger of Virginia became close could get out of town, which he and the friends, the latter being equally handy prosecutor proceeded to do. They hot with the cards. On one New Year's footed it to Red Hill about five miles day Riddleburger said to Bowen that distant to the railway station, boarded he would make some late calls and the train for Denver and neither of leave cards without entering his them ever returned to Park County. friends' houses. "Leave a few packs Bowen soon after resigned, pursuant for me", said Bowen, "and let 'em be to an announcement which he had squeezers." made prior to the episode above re- Edward 0. Wolcott easily beat Sen- counted. ator Bowen when he tood for re-elec- He was elected to the General Assem- tion. He returned to Colorado and bly from Rio Grande County in the moved to Pueblo where he spent his fall of the same year and to the United last few years in relative seclusion. States Senate by that Assembly in His party nominated him for Con- January, 1883. He accomplished this gress in 1894, but he was defeated by feat by asking for and securing the John C. Bell. He died soon afterwards. pledge of a complimentary vote suffi- Thus ended his unique career. While ciently large with his own to give him most interesting, it can hardly be re- a bare majority. Being a member of garded as worthy of imitation. He the caucus, he could easily see that possessed undoubted talents, which the vote was cast as promised. The were nearly always misdirected. His result was a sensation, but his real ambitions were lofty, but, when realiz- supporters pressed their advantage ed, they were distorted to ignoble ends. and his election followed. As a sena- While he achieved some distinctions, tor his record was a blank. Beyond he ignored or despised their respon- drawing his salary and voting with sibilities. The fates have been kind his party he did practically nothing, to him, for he is gone and forgotten. Az1 Political Libel Suit It seems incredible that the man to 1808 to break up the Union and re- whom his constituents gave the well annex New England to England. known "Webster Vase", bearing the in- This prosecution arose out of the scription "PRESENTED TO DANIEL political campaign of 1828. The Feder- WEBSTER, THE DEFENDER OF alist ticket for the election was headed THE CONSTITUTION, BY THE CITI- by John Quincy Adams for President. ZENS OF BOSTON", and who is The Democratic candidate was Andrew known today as "The Defender of the Jackson. Adams, in 1807 and 1808, as Constitution", should ever have a Federalist senator had split with his thought it necessary, in protecting his local party over the Embargo Acts for reputation, to institute a prosecution which he had been a staunch advocate. against Theodore Lyman, Jr., for al- However, in 1828, Webster and most leged criminal libel upon him, Webster, Federalists in Massachusetts supported as a senator of the United States in Adams as against Jackson, while other publishing that he, Webster, conspired Federalists, who had not forgotten with other leading Federalists in 1807- Adams' support of the detested Em- THE DENVER BAR ASSOCIATION RECORD before the election for bargo Acts, supported Jackson and es- fortnight President all over the Country? Why tablished a semi-weekly paper, called for three years he has held to his the "Jackson Republican", to support counsellor, Dan- Jackson. Theodore Lyman was one bosom, as a political man, whom he called of the proprietors of this paper. iel Webster, a in his midnight denunciation, a October 29, 1828, the following ar- traitor in 1808? And as the last ticle appeared in this paper: "We question, why, during the visits he this morning a letter of De- publish has made to Boston, he always met cember, 1825, of Mr. Jefferson to in friendly and intimate and social Mr. Giles, and Mr. Adams' own state- terms all the gentlemen whose ment, published last week in the names a few years before he placed Intelligencer at Washing- National upon a secret record in the archives ton, concerning disclosures said, of our Government as traitors to many months ago, to have been made their country? Why did he eat their Mr. Adams to Mr. Jefferson, in by salt, break their bread and drink to the conduct of the leaders regard their wine?" of the Federal party in New Eng- land during the whole course of the The letter of Mr. Jefferson, referred commercial restrictive system. Mr. to in this article and published in the Adams confirms in his statement, in same issue of the Jackson Republican, a positive and authentic form and mentioned that Mr. Adams said "cer- shape, the very important fact that tain citizens of the Eastern States" in the years 1807 and 1808, he did without mentioning Webster or any- make such disclosures. The reader one, and did not use the words "en- will observe that Mr. Adams dis- gaged in a plot to dissolve the Union." tinctly asserts that Harrison Gray Webster had been a leader in oppo- Otis, Samuel Dexter, William Pres- sition to the Embargo Acts and had cott, Daniel Webster, Elizah H. Mills, openly stated they were unconstitu- Israel Thorndike, Josiah Quincy, tional. There were many movements Benjamin Russell, John Welles, and in opposition to these acts, some of others of the Federal party of their which contemplated secession. Mr. age and standing were engaged in a Webster, in his second speech on Foot's plot to dissolve the Union and to re- Resolution, when charged by Hayne annex New England to Great Brit- with having advocated secession as ain; and that he (Mr. Adams) pos- a last resort in opposition to the Pm- sessed 'unequivocal evidence' of that bargo Acts, replied that he had always most solemn design. The reader will stated that the Acts were unconstitu- also observe that in the statement tional but had never advocated any- is just published, of Mr. Adams, there thing but submitting to the decision no intimation whatever, that he does of the Supreme Court. not still believe what he revealed to hurt the dignity Mr. Jefferson and Mr. Giles twenty Perhaps it deeply years ago. All the gentlemen we of Webster to be thus linked up with it was for have mentioned above are, with one his past. More probably exception, still living, and with two political purposes that a criminal pros- exceptions, are active and ardent po- ecution was instituted. At any rate, edition litical friends of Mr. Adams. We Mr. Webster in the six volume here beg leave to ask why Mr. Adams of his works, compiled by himself, statement has been withheld from makes no mention of this trial and the public eye more than a year? omits any reference to his writings Why it has been published only one or speeches on the Embargo Acts. THE DENVER BAR ASSOCIATION RECORD It is historical that no demand was did publish the statement ascribed to made for an explanation, although him. Webster and Lyman had been close 2. The letter of Mr. Jefferson to political bed-fellows in 1807 and 1808 Mr. Giles. and still were on intimate social terms 3. That Mr. Webster in 1808 was a in 1828. Moreover, it was a criminal conspicuous member of the Federal prosecution which was started, and not party. a civil suit for damages for defama- 4. That Mr. Adams wrote the let. tion. ters ascribed to him, but denied that Seemingly, without a word of warn- Mr. Webster was comprehended or in- ing, Webster struck by complaining cluded in the terms of Mr. Adams' before the Grand Jury and securing statement. a true bill which charge that Theodore The continuance was denied and the Lyman, Jr., "unlawfully, maliciously trial commenced on December 16th. and deliberately, devising, contriving Isaac Parker, Chief Justice of the Su- and intending to traduce, vilify and preme Court, presided. After the jury bring into contempt and detestation, was empanelled, the prosecution pro- one Daniel Webster * * * to cause it ceeded to prove the election of Mr. to be believed that the said Daniel Webster to the Senate of the United Webster * * * had been engaged in an States, the publication of the alleged atrocious and treasonable plot to dis- libel, the circulation of the paper, its solve the Union * * * unlawfully, mali- ownership by Mr. Lyman, and rested. ciously and deliberately, did compose, Mr. Dexter opened for the defense; a print and publish, and did cause and certain pamphlet, which it was stated procure, to be composed, printed and had been written by Mr. Webster, published, * * * of and concerning him, called "Considerations on the Embargo the said Daniel Webster, an unlawful, Laws" was introduced for the purpose malicious and infamous libel" * * * of using certain extracts from it; the charging Webster with having "enter- objection to its introduction without ed into a plot to dissolve the Union." its being read entire was sustained.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us