Seven Priorties for the New TCHC Special Working Group, from Engaging Tenants, to Enlisting Experts

Seven Priorties for the New TCHC Special Working Group, from Engaging Tenants, to Enlisting Experts

Seven priorties for the new TCHC Special Working Group, from engaging tenants, to enlisting experts. It has members and a mandate, and now the new Special Working Group on the Toronto Community Housing Corpo- ration (TCHC), chaired by Councillor Ana Bailão, has about six months to chart a financially sustainable future for the city’s biggest landlord. The Special Working Group was created after Toronto City Council voted to reject a scheme proposed by the TCHC Board for a massive sell-off of affordable homes to finance a growing capital repair bill. This backgrounder from the Wellesley Institute sets out seven key priorities facing the Special Working Group. 1. PROTECTING AND PRESERVING THE EXISTING A key priority for the new Special Working Group is to TCHC HOUSING PORTFOLIO. recognize the critical importance that TCHC’s housing stock plays in meeting the affordable housing needs of A good home is one of the most important determinants low and moderate-income Torontonians, and reject the of health for individuals and the entire community, as downward spiral of housing sell-offs to finance ongoing noted in the Wellesley Institute’s Precarious Housing in repair needs. Canada report, TCHC owns more than 2,200 buildings that provide an affordable home to more than 164,000 2. ENGAGING TCHC TENANTS IN CREATING tenants.1 Almost all of its tenants have very low incomes A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE. and are among the most vulnerable in the city. TCHC is the second largest landlord in North America and its When the TCHC Board of Directors voted on the pro- portfolio of buildings ranges from high-rise to single- posed sell-off of affordable homes, the two tenant rep- family dwellings. TCHC is a critically important asset resentatives on the TCHC Board were the only votes in building a healthy and equitable Toronto. against the proposal. The advocacy group, Tenants for Social Housing, has helped lead the campaign for a bet- Toronto’s affordable housing waiting list reached an all- ter TCHC and has effectively engaged tenants with very time record of 82,138 households in December of 2011 limited resources.3 – this after setting previous records every month since the onset of the recession in 2008. The Wellesley Insti- Unfortunately, there are no TCHC tenants directly ap- tute, along with other housing experts and advocates, pointed to the new Special Working Group, so there including four former mayors of Toronto, called on To- needs to be a strong commitment to engage tenants in ronto Council to reject the wholesale sell-off of TCHC the process, and in multiple ways. TCHC tenants know homes.2 their buildings, and they have valuable expertise to share with the Special Working Group. Former Mayor Barbara Hall, who is Chief Commis- sioner of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, has The Special Working Group needs to commit specific -fi also warned that the proposed sell-off might violate the nancial and staff resources to ensuring that tenants are province’s Human Rights Code. at the centre of its work. This includes a commitment to a variety of face-to-face and on-line processes to engage A year ago, TCHC’s entire Board of Directors was purged tenants, and funding to support tenant engagement, in- in an unprecedented move by Mayor Rob Ford. The May- cluding childcare costs. or installed his political partner, former city councillor Case Ootes, as the interim one-man Board. Ootes had Research in Canada and elsewhere demonstrates that long advocated for the sell-off of a significant portion of affordable housing that fully engages its residents in de- the TCHC portfolio, and put this issue on the housing velopment and management delivers a number of bene- agency agenda during his tenure. The new Board, hand- fits, including more cost-efficient operations and better picked by Mayor Ford, adopted the Ootes scheme. outcomes for tenants. The ideological agenda that motivated the proposal to TCHC has pioneered some tenant engagement process- sell-off TCHC homes needs to be set against the urgent es, including participatory budgeting and environmen- and growing need for more affordable homes, and to tal initiatives. The lessons learned from public housing properly maintain the existing stock of housing. providers in the UK and US, show that smart tenant en- gagement delivers tangible and lasting positive results, 1http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/publication/new-report-precarious-housing- in-canada-2010 including better housing, more cost-efficient operations and multiple benefits to the tenants themselves. 2http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/housing/four-former-mayors-urge-city-coun- cil-ontario-government-to-reject-scheme-to-sell-off-706-affordable-homes 3http://tenantsforsocialhousing.com WELLESLEY INSTITUTE | 1 Engaging tenants immediately and throughout the Spe- loaded affordable housing to the municipalities short- cial Working Group will ensure that the process bene- changes TCHC by tens of millions of dollars annually. fits from the ideas and expertise of tenants. They are an Under the provincial rules, TCHC gets a smaller subsidy important pool of good ideas and pragmatic solutions. than an equivalent landlord in the private sector. A key priority for the Special Working Group is to ensure As housing analyst Joy Connelly has noted, the provin- that TCHC tenants are meaningfully and fully engaged cial rules cost TCHC $77 million annually, according to in multiple ways throughout its six-month tenure. a 2007 Toronto staff report and the figure has certainly grown since then.5 Plugging the provincial rent subsidy 3 & 4. RE-ENGAGING THE FEDERAL AND shortfall would just about cover the estimated annual PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS. growth in the TCHC repair bill of $100 million. A significant portion of the large, and growing, capital A key priority for the new Special Working Group is to repair shortfall at TCHC has been caused by funding negotiate a fairer rent subsidy formula with the provin- shortfalls from senior levels of government. cial government that plugs the annual shortfall that amounts to tens of millions of dollars. Much of the TCHC housing portfolio was developed un- der federal and provincial housing programs and down- 5. REAPING ADDITIONAL SAVINGS IN ENERGY loaded to the City of Toronto in the late 1990s. TCHC AND OTHER BUILDING UPGRADES. estimates that its current repair shortfall is about $750 million, and a large portion of that shortfall is linked to TCHC has already done some significant work in ener- the former Ontario Housing Corporation public hous- gy and other building upgrades in its portfolio. Those ing projects that were downloaded without adequate capital investments have substantially reduced energy capital reserves to the city. and other utility bills, as well as improved the quality of the housing for the tenants. The cost of those invest- In his recent report to the Ontario government on pub- ments is paid for over time through the substantial sav- lic services, economist Don Drummond noted that ings in energy, utility and operating costs. the province has an ongoing obligation to ensure that municipally-managed affordable housing is well-main- Within TCHC’s portfolio of single-family homes and tained, and that local housing managers have adequate smaller buildings (which is the target of the latest sell- financial resources.4 off scheme), there are additional savings that can be realized from an ongoing upgrade program. An audit Drummond called on the provincial and federal govern- of buildings that includes the involvement of tenants ments to negotiate a new long-term and fully-funded af- living in those buildings, will yield additional savings fordable housing agreement to replace the current, in- in the future. TCHC can use those future savings to adequate and short-term housing deals. He also noted help repay the financing required to make the initial that housing is a critical component of municipal social capital investments. infrastructure, and that the provincial government has an obligation to ensure local governments have access A key priority for the new Special Working Group is to to adequate financial resources to properly maintain identify and implement a portfolio-wide program of their housing stock. energy and other building upgrades to realize substan- tial future savings in building operations. In 2008, the provincial government allocated $200 mil- lion across the entire province for social housing re- 6. IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE SOCIAL pairs, and in 2009, the federal government allocated $1 FINANCING OPTIONS. billion for the entire country. A small portion of those funds made their way to Toronto and were used effec- Governments in Britain, the US and Australia, among tively to repair substandard housing, but the amount on others, are using innovative financing tools – including offer was far short of the capital funding shortfall creat- social impact bonds – to finance important social in- ed by the senior levels of government when they down- vestments. Federal Housing Minister, Diane Finley, has loaded affordable housing to Toronto in the 1990s. recently expressed support for introducing new social finance instruments in Canada. In addition, the latest A key priority for the new Special Working Group is to Ontario provincial budget expresses support for new so- take up the Drummond Commission’s recommenda- cial finance initiatives. tions, and start negotiations with federal and provincial governments on adequate and appropriate long-term Infrastructure Ontario’s affordable housing loan fund funding to repair existing substandard housing and to was capitalized several years ago using traditional gov- build much-needed new affordable homes. ernment-backed bonds, and this fund provides low-cost capital dollars to affordable housing providers for both In addition, the complicated rent subsidy formula es- repair and new construction. tablished by the provincial government when it down- Social impact bonds, tax-exempt housing bonds, and 4 http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/reformcommission 5 http://openingthewindow.com/2011/11/14/looking-for-a-painless-100-million WELLESLEY INSTITUTE | 2 other more innovative social finance tools are being and informed policy solutions.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us