2.6 the Implicit Function Theorem. a Surface Can Be Described As a Graph

2.6 the Implicit Function Theorem. a Surface Can Be Described As a Graph

Lecture 7: 2.6 The implicit function theorem. A surface can be described as a graph: z = f(x; y) or as a level surface F (x; y; z) = C It is clear that a graph can always be written as a level surface with F (x; y; z) = z ¡f(x; y). The question is if a level surface can always be written as graph, i.e can we always solve uniquely the equation F (x; y; z) = 0 for z as a function of (x; y). The example of a sphere F (x; y; z) = x2 + y2 + z2 = C shows that this not the case since for C > 0 we have two possible values p z = § C ¡ x2 ¡ y2; corresponding to the northern and southern hemisphere. Hence in this case we need two di®erent functions to describe parts of the surface as graphs. Its easy imagine surface were you would need several functions. However, for the sphere, even with two functions its not quite good since the slope or derivative would be in¯nite on the equator x2 +y2 = C. To solve this problem one can instead close to the equator write the surface as graph of y over the x ¡ z plane, or x over the y ¡ z plane: p p y = § C ¡ x2 ¡ z2; x = § C ¡ y2 ¡ z2: Then the question is if in general and equation of the form F (x; y; z) = 0 close to any point with F (x0; y0; z0) = 0 can always be written as graph over one of the coordinate planes z = f(x; y); y = g(x; z); or x = h(y; z) In the example above we see that if C = 0 the only solution to F (x; y; z) = x2 + y2 + z2 = 0 is (x; y; z) = (0; 0; 0) which is not a surface but only a point so it is not always true. However it is true if rF (x0; y0; z0) = (Fx(x0; y0; z0);Fy(x0; y0; z0);Fz(x0; y0; z0)) 6= (0; 0; 0): Since if the gradient is non vanishing then one of the derivatives e.g. Fz is non vanishing, this is a consequence of the implicit function theorem: Implicit Function Theorem Suppose that F (x0; y0; z0)= 0 and Fz(x0; y0; z0)6=0. Then there is function f(x; y) and a neighborhood U of (x0; y0; z0) such that for (x; y; z) 2 U the equation F (x; y; z) = 0 is equivalent to z = f(x; y). Ex A special case is F (x; y; z) = f(x; y)¡az = 0. It is clear that we need Fz = a 6= 0 in order to solve for z as a function of (x; y). A related theorem is: n n Inverse¡ Function¢ Theorem Let F : R ! R . Suppose that F (x0) = y0 and det DF (x0) 6= 0. Then there is a function G and a neighborhood U of (x0; y0) such that for (x; y) 2 U the equation F (x) = y is equivalent to x = G(y) Ex A special case of this theorem is f : R ! R, in which case its easy to see from the graph that the equation f(x) = y is invertible if f 0(x) 6= 0. If f(x)=x2 =y then f 0(0)=0. For y <0 there are no solutions and two for y >0. If f(x) = x3 = y is invertible even though the condition in the theorem fails. Idea of Proof If F (x) = Ax where A is n £ n matrix then the equation Ax = y is invertible if and only if A is an invertible matrix, i.e. if det A 6= 0. 1 2 Sections 3.1 Paths, 3.2 Arc length. (The material below only took half a lecture so in the future I might move it and do it together with path integrals in section 7.1). If c is a vector valued function c(t) = x(t) i + y(t) j + z(t) k; a · t · b then we de¯ned the derivative to be c(t + 4t) ¡ c(t) c0(t) = lim = x0(t) i + y0(t) j + z0(t) k: 4t!0 4t We de¯ne the arc length of the curve to be Z b p L = (dx=dt)2 + (dy=dt)2 + (dz=dt)2 dt a However, since p jc0(t)j = x0(t)2 + y0(t)2 + z0(t)2 this can also be written: Z b L = jc0(t)j dt a It is easy to see that it is the arc length if we approximate it by a Riemann sum: nX¡1 0 L » j c (ti)j4t i=0 where ti = a + i4t, 4t = (b ¡ a)=n and use the de¯nition of derivative: 0 c(ti + h) ¡ c(ti) c(ti + 4t) ¡ c(ti) c (ti) = lim » ; h!0 h 4t if 4t is small, we obtain nX¡1 L » j c(ti + 4t) ¡ c(ti)j: i=0 This is exactly the length of the polygon consisting of the line segments between the vertices c(ti), i = 0; :::; n, which is a good approximation of the arc length. Ex. Find the arc length of the helix c(t) = cos t i + sin t j + t k, when 0 · t · 2¼. p p Sol. We have c0(t) = ¡ sin t i + cos t j + k, so jc0(t)j = sin2 t + cos2 t + 1 = 2. Z 2¼ Z 2¼ p p Hence L = j c0(t)j dt = 2 dt = 2 2¼. 0 0 The same curve can be represented by di®erent parameterizations: p 2 2 2 Ex. Find the arc length of the helix: c2(u)=cos u i + sin u j + u k, 0·u· 2¼. Sol. We have c0 (u) = ¡2u sin u2 i + 2u cos u2 j + 2uk. Hence p 2 p 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 jc2(u)j = 4u sin u + 4u cos u + 4u = 2 2 u and Z p Z p · ¸ Z 2¼ 2¼ p 2 2¼ p p 0 u = t; L = jc2(u)j du = 2 2u du = = 2 dt = 2 2¼ 0 0 2u du = dt 0 Two di®erent parameterizations, c(t)=c2(u), where u=u(t), leads to the same arc 0 0 0 length. By the chain rule c (t)=dc2(u)=dt=c (u)u (t) and if we change variables Z · 2 ¸ Z u = u(t); j c0 (u)j du = = j c0(t)j dt: 2 du = u0(t) dt 3 Section 3.3. A Vector ¯eld F : R3 ! R3 is a map that to each point (x; y; z) in space assigns a vector F(x; y; z) = F1(x; y; z)i + F2(x; y; z)j + F3(x; y; z)k. Graphi- cally, a vector ¯eld is illustrated by, from a few points in space R = xi + yj + zk drawing the arrow representing the vector F(R). There are many physical examples of vector ¯elds, e.g. the gravitational ¯eld at each point in space by Newton's law tells a mass in which direction to accelerate and how much. Another example is the velocity vector ¯eld of air flow: Sand particles moving in a storm or dust moving in the room, where the vector ¯eld at a point in space F(R) gives the velocity of the particles at the point R. Similarly, the velocity vector ¯eld of a fluid gives the velocity of the fluid (particle) at each point in space. A Flow line for a vector ¯eld F is a path R(t) such that at each point along it ¡ ¢ (1) R0(t) = ¯F R(t) ; ¯ > 0 The flow lines for the velocity vector ¯eld of a fluid are just the curves along which the fluid particles travel. From the graphic illustration of a vector ¯eld one can approximately draw the flow lines, by going in the direction of the vector ¯eld. If ¯ is a positive scalar ¯eld then the flow lines for ¯F are the same as the flow lines for F its just that we travel along the path at di®erent speed, so we can reduce to the case ¯ = 1 by a change of parameter along the curve. The flow lines can not intersect; since the vector ¯eld gives the direction there is a unique flow line through each point. In fact through each initial point there is a unique solutions to the system of di®erential equations (1): dx dy dz = ¯F ; = ¯F ; t = ¯F ; dt 1 dt 2 d 3 In order to solve this system one can formally eliminate ¯dt and think of one of the other variables as the parameter along the curve: dx dy dz (2) = = F1 F2 F3 Ex. 1 Find the flow lines for the vector ¯eld F = xi + yj. Sol. dx=x = dy=y = dz=0. The last equation should be interpreted as dz = 0 so z =C1. The second equation dx=x=dy=y gives ln x=ln y ¡ C so if we exponentiate C y =xe =C2x. The flow lines are therefore half lines going out from the z-axis Ex. 2 Find the flow lines for the vector ¯eld F = ¡yi + xj. Sol.¡dx=y =dy=x=dz=0. Hence dz =0 so z =c1. Also ¡dx=y =dy=x so ¡xdx=ydy 2 2 2 2 and ¡x =2=y =2 ¡ c, i.e. x + y =c2. The flow lines are circles around the z-axis.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us