Commentary Bibliography and Further Readings The following bibliography of primary and secondary literature consulted in the preparation of this volume is by no means exhaustive. Rather, I have here com- piled a few short lists of only the most representative primary readings sufficient for the reader to attain a solid introductory grounding in each author’s main ideas, and have augmented such lists with a number of suggested and easily accessible sec- ondary readings meant to contextualize the author’s works and their reception within the relevant fields of discourse. When consulting these chapter bibliographies and list of suggested further readings, please note that each reprinted selection in this anthology also contains its own original citation list that has been reprinted at the conclusion of each selection. Many of these original reference lists (e.g., Anderson et al.) reveal state-of-the-art scholarship at the time of their writing, and provide critically important bibliographic information that has not been reproduced on the following lists of suggested introductory readings. By using both sets of lists in tan- dem, however, and by following the trail of signs that appear as reference texts beget further reference texts, the reader should be able to proceed from the readings con- tained in this introductory anthology to an increasingly full acquaintance with the extant scholarship in the field. – D.F. Donald Francis Favareau (Pages 1a–1z) Primary Literature Favareau, D. (2001). Beyond self and other: The neurosemiotic emergence of intersubjectivity. Sign Systems Studies, 30(1), 57–101. Favareau, D. (2002). Constructing representema: On the neurosemiotics of self and vision. Semiotics, Evolution, Energy and Development Journal, 2(4), 3–24. Favareau, D. (2005). What is biosemiotics? Available online at: http://www.biosemiotics.org Favareau, D. (2006). Founding a world biosemiotics institution: The International Society for Biosemiotic Studies. Sign System Studies, 33(2), 481–485. Favareau, D. (2007). The Evolutionary History of Biosemiotics. In Barbieri, M. (Ed.) Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.1–68. Favareau, D. (2007a). Animal sensing, acting and knowing: Bridging the relations between brains, bodies and world. In Witzany, G. (Ed.) Biosemiotics in Transdisciplinary Contexts. Helsinki: Umweb, pp. 61–69. D. Favareau, Essential Readings in Biosemiotics, Biosemiotics 3, 797 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9650-1, C Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 798 Commentary Bibliography and Further Readings Favareau, D. (2007b). How to Make Peirce’s Ideas Clear. In Witzany, G. (Ed.) Biosemiotics in Transdisciplinary Contexts. Helsinki: Umweb, pp. 163–173. Favareau, D. (2008). Collapsing the Wave Function of Meaning: The Epistemological Matrix of Talk-in-interaction. In Hoffmeyer, J. (Ed.) A Legacy forLiving Systems: Gregory Bateson as a Precursor to Biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 169–212. Favareau, D. (2008a). The biosemiotic turn: a brief history of the sign concept in pre-modernist science. Biosemiotics, 1, 5–23. Favareau, D. (2008b). Iconic, indexical and symbolic understanding. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 56(3), 789–801. Favareau, D. (2008c). Understanding natural constructivism. Semiotica, 172(1/4), 489–528. Favareau, D. (2008d). Joining sign science with life science. The American Journal of Semiotics, 24(1–3), iii–xv. Favareau, D. (2008e). The IASS Roundtable on Biosemiotics: A Discussion with Some of the Founders of the Field (Claus Emmeche, Jesper Hoffmeyer, Kalevi Kull, Anton Markos, Frederik Stjernfelt). The American Journal of Semiotics, 24/1, 1–21. Additional Chapter References and Further Readings Alexander, V. (2009). The poetics of purpose. Biosemiotics, 2, 77–100. Andrade, E. (2003). Demonios de Darwin. Semiótica y termodinámica de la evolución biológica. Bogota: Siglo del Hombre. Arnellos, A., Spyros, V., Spyrou, T., Darzentas, J. (2006). The emergence of autonomous representations in artificial agents. Journal of Computers, 1(6), 29–36. Arnellos, A., Spyrou, T. and Darzentas, J. (2008). Emergence and downward causation in contem- porary artificial agents: Implications for their autonomy and design guidelines. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 15(3/4), 15–41. Arnellos, A., Spyrou, T. and Darzentas, J. (2010). Towards the naturalization of agency based on an interactivist account of autonomy. New Ideas in Psychology, forthcoming. Artmann, S. (2007). Computing Codes versus Interpreting Life. In Barbieri, M. (Ed.) Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Berlin: Springer, pp. 209–234. Artmann, S. (2008). Organic problem solving: Biology, decision theory, and the physical symbol system hypothesis. The American Journal of Semiotics, 24(1/3), 95–106. Artmann, S. (2009). Basic semiosis as code-based control. Biosemiotics, 2(1), 31–38. Baenziger, E. J. (2009). Alpha and Omega: The oldest and newest example of interphyloge- netic semiotics – the orchid. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual International Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference. Charles University, Prague June 30–July 5, 2009. Barbieri, M. (2004). The definitions of information and meaning: two possible boundaries between physics and biology. Rivista di Biologia-Biology Forum, 97(1), 91–110. Barbieri, M. (2006). Semantic biology and the mind-body problem: The theory of the conventional mind. Biological Theory, 1(4), 352–356. Barbieri, M. (Ed.) (2007). Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer. Barbieri, M. (Ed.) (2008a). The Codes of Life: The Rules of Macroevolution. Dordrecht: Springer. Barbieri, M. (2008b). Biosemiotics: A new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften, 95, 577–599. Barbieri, M. (2008c). The code model of semiosis: The first steps towards a scientific biosemiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 24(1/3), 23–37. Brands, M., Arnellos, A., Spyrou, T. and Darzentas, J. (2007). A biosemiotic analysis of sero- tonin’s complex functionality. In Witzany, G. (Ed.) Biosemiotics in Transdisciplinary Contexts. Helsinki: Umweb, pp. 125–132. Apel, K. O. (1981). Charles S. Peirce: From Pragmatism to Pragmaticism.InKrois,J.M.(Trans.) Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press. Commentary Bibliography and Further Readings 799 Augustyn, P. (2009). Uexküll, Peirce, and other affinities between biosemiotics and biolinguistics. Biosemiotics, 2(1), 1–17. Bailey, R. W., Matejka, L. and Steiner, P. (Eds.) (1978). The Sign: Semiotics Around the World. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications. Bains, P. (2006). The Primacy of Semiosis: An Ontology of Relations. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. Bakker, P. and Thijssen, J. (Eds.) (2007). Mind, Cognition, and Representation: The Tradition of Commentaries on Aristotle’s De Anima. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing. Barbieri, M. (Ed.) (2007). Is the cell a semiotic system? In Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Berlin: Springer, pp. 179–208. Baluška, F., Mancuso, S., Volkmann, D. and Barlow, P. (2004). Root apices as plant command centres: the unique ‘brain-like’ status of the root apex transition zone. Biologia Bratislava, 59, 7–19. Baluška, F., Volkmann, D. and Menzel, D. (2005). Plant synapses: actin-based domains for cell-to- cell communication. Trends Plant Science, 10, 106–111. Baluška, F., Volkmann, D. and Mancuso, S. (2006). Communication in Plants: Neuronal Aspects of Plant Life. Berlin: Springer. Barlow, P. W. (2007). Information in plant life and development: A biosemiotic approach. Triple-C: The Journal of Cognition, Communication, and Cooperation, 5(2), 37–48. Benosman, R. and Kang, S. B. (Eds.) (2001). Panoramic Vision: Sensors, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Springer. Bickhard, M. H. (1999). Representation in natural and artificial agents. In Taborsky, E. (Ed.) Semiosis, Evolution, Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, pp. 15–25. Bickhard, M. H. (2003). The biological emergence of representation. In Brown, T. and Smith, L. (Eds.) Emergence and Reduction: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium of the Jean Piaget Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 105–131. Böll, M. (2008). Social is emotional. Biosemiotics, 1(3), 329–346. Bouissac, P., Herzfeld, M. and Posner, R. (Eds.) (1986). Iconicity: Essays on the Nature of Culture: Festschrift for Thomas A. Sebeok on his 65th Birthday. Tubingen: Stauffenburg Verlag. Bouissac, P. (Ed.) (1998). Encyclopedia of Semiotics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Brands, M., Arnellos, A., Spyrou, T. and Darzentas, J. (2007). A biosemiotic analysis of sero- tonin’s complex functionality. In Witzany, G. (Ed.) Biosemiotics in Transdisciplinary Contexts. Helsinki: Umweb, pp. 125–132. Bruni, L. E. (2007). Cellular semiotics and signal transduction. In Barbieri, M. (Ed.) Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Berlin: Springer, pp. 365–408. Bruni, L. E. (2008a). Gregory Bateson’s Relevance to Current Molecular Biology. In Hoffmeyer, J. (Ed.) A Legacy for Living Systems: Gregory Bateson as a Precursor to Biosemiotics. Berlin: Springer, 93–120. Bruni, L. E. (2008b). Semiotic freedom: emergence and teleology in biological and cognitive interfaces. The American Journal of Semiotics, 24(1/3), 57–74. Bruni, L. E. (2008c). Hierarchical categorical perception in sensing and cognitive processes. Biosemiotics, 1(1), 113–130. Callebaut, W. (1993). Taking the Naturalistic Turn, or, How Real Philosophy of Science is Done.