Acid Output with the Pentagastrin Test in Normal and Duodenal Ulcer Subjects

Acid Output with the Pentagastrin Test in Normal and Duodenal Ulcer Subjects

Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.19.10.865 on 1 October 1978. Downloaded from Gut, 1978, 19, 865-869 Comparison of an intragastric method of estimating acid output with the pentagastrin test in normal and duodenal ulcer subjects T. V. TAYLOR, J. B. ELDER1, P.C. GANGULI, AND I.E. GILLESPIE From the University Department of Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester SUMMARY Using Fordtran's technique but substituting the meat extract Oxo for the steak meal we investigated gastric acid secretion in eight control subjects and nine patients with chronic duodenal ulcer. Intragastric titration was performed using a double lumen tube measuring the pH in the stomach every three minutes and adjusting it to 5-5 throughout the test by infusing 0-3-M sodium bicarbonate. On a separate day a pentagastrin test was performed using a conventional gastric aspiration technique. In the eight control subjects the mean acid output after pentagastrin was 13-7 + 2*1 (SEM) mmol/h, whereas the mean hourly acid output measured by intragastric titration was 20 1 + 31. The greater response to Oxo than to pentagastrin in the controls (zJAO = + 46 %) was significant (p < 0O01). This is in contrast with our duodenal ulcer patients whose mean hourly acid outputs were 22.7 + 4.4 and 23.0 + 4.4 mmol/h in response to pentagastrin and Oxo respect- ively (r = 0 95). The findings, while clearly at variance with those of Fordtran and Walsh (1973), are more in keeping with the concept of increased endogenous secretory drive in duodenal ulcer patients compared to normal subjects. http://gut.bmj.com/ It has always been difficult to measure the rate of possibility of substantially altering perhaps both acid secretion when food has been present in the gastric acid secretion and serum gastrin levels. human stomach, and almost all our physiological The meat extract Oxo (Brooke Bond Oxo, information on the response of the stomach to food Limited) is well known to be a potent stimulant of has been obtained in laboratory animals with gastrin release from the antrum (Giles and Clark, gastric pouches used to mirror the performance of 1966) and, using a much simpler protocol than on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. the main stomach. Rune (1966) estimated acid Malagelada et al., we routinely use it in our labora- output in response to a solid meal, but this technique tory to determine the 'integrated plasma gastrin required arterial puncture in order to measure response'. changes in arterial base. Fordtran and Walsh (1973) In this study our aim has been to compare an recently suggested a method for measuring gastric intragastric titration method of estimating acid acid secretion in the presence of food in the human output, using Oxo stimulation, with the conventional stomach. These workers assessed the acid secretory pentagastrin stimulation test in normal and duodenal response to a meal consisting of steak and bread ulcer patients. and butter by intragastric titration with sodium bicarbonate. Malagelada and his colleagues (1976) Methods used a much more refined technique with both gastric and duodenal markers to measure gastric Eight control volunteer subjects with normal intact secretory responses without artificially maintaining stomachs and nine preoperative patients with the pH of the stomach at 5 5-thus avoiding the chronic duodenal ulceration were studied. Four standard Oxo cubes were dissolved in 400 ml of water at 37°C., giving a 6-25o% w.v. solution. The 'Address for reprint requests: Mr J. B. Elder, Department mean pH of five solutions made up in this way was of Surgery, The Royal Infirmary, Manchester, M13 9WL. 5*4, with a range of 5 2-5-5. To reduce the pH of the Received for publication 18 May 1978 solution to 3 0, 26 mmol HCI were required, and to 865 Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.19.10.865 on 1 October 1978. Downloaded from 866 T. V. Taylor, J. B. Elder, P. C. Ganguli, and L E. Gillespie reduce it to 2-0, 44 mmol. Allowing the solution to bicarbonate. Aspiration of samples and adequate stand overnight made no difference to this titration, mixing was in our experience much more satisfactory and adding the equivalent amount of sodium bicar- using Oxo than the steak and toast meal of Fordtran bonate at all stages brought the pH back to its and Walsh. Zero time was taken as that time when original value. Duplicate titrations of several the instillation of the Oxo meal was complete. In samples of the Oxo solution were performed on six normal subjects and seven duodenal ulcer several occasions noting the amounts of 0-1 MHCI patients blood samples were taken for gastrin required to reduce the pH to 4, 3, and 2. We found estimations at times - 5, 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 that r = 0 99 for Ti versus T2 (n = 12, y = 0 99 x minutes and the plasma separated and stored at + 0 064). - 20'C for estimation of plasma gastrin concentra- After an overnight fast each subject was intubated tion subsequently by radioimmunoassay (Ganguli with a double lumen nasogastric tube (Anderson and Hunter, 1972). The test continued for one hour no. AN 10). The distance between the proximal after, introducing Oxo. The integrated plasma and distal openings on the tube was 10 cm. A 2 ml gastrin response was calculated as previously sample of fasting gastric juice was aspirated, the pH described (Ganguli et al., 1974). On a separate measured, and then it was returned to the stomach. occasion after an overnight fast each subject had Usually the pH was below 5 5 and 0 3 M sodium his maximal acid output determined in response to bicarbonate was infused from a Braun Unita pump subcutaneous pentagastrin 6 ,ug/kg body weight in through the fine limb of the tube until the intra- the conventional manner using a gastric aspiration gastric pH was adjusted to 5 5. Essentially the technique (Multicentre Study, 1969). technique was that of Fordtran and Walsh (1973). The ages of the volunteer subjects, six males and Four hundred millilitres of Oxo were introduced two females, ranged from 20 to 49 years (mean through the longer limb of the nasogastric tube, 28-25 years), and in the male duodenal ulcer patients corresponding to the distal opening, using a 50 ml from 27 to 51 years (mean 41-4 years). The average syringe. With the subject resting in the recumbent weight of the volunteers was 68-0 kg and that of position the gastric content was sampled at three the ulcer patients was 70-2 kg. minute intervals for one hour. To facilitate adequate mixing the subject was asked to rotate from side to Results side and the left hypochondrium was compressed gently and intermittently. Fifty millilitres of gastric The mean cumulative acid outputs in the control http://gut.bmj.com/ content were rapidly aspirated and reintroduced and duodenal ulcer subjects are shown in Fig. 1 in and finally a 3 ml sample was taken to assess the mmol per 15 minutes at intervals up to one hour. intragastric pH and this was then returned to the Throughout the study an increased acid output in stomach. The pH was maintained as near to 5-5 as response to Oxo was observed compared with that was possible by varying the rate of infusion of to pentagastrin in normal subjects. The response on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. DUODENAL ULCERS NORMALS o oxo 201 I x PENTAGASTRIN o OXO I 150 X PENTAGASTRIN E 0 -0 0 101 0 I,, . \1 11 I--, , .0 I 0 ,- _ J.,- - is5 30 45 60 15 30 i5 (a) TIME (min) Time (min) Fig. 1 Cumulative acid outputs to pentagastrin and to Oxo (a) in normal subjects and (b) in duodenal ulcer subjects. A significant difference between the responses to Oxo andpentagastrin was observed in normal subjects only (p < 001). Mean + SD (1 mEq = 1 mmol). Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.19.10.865 on 1 October 1978. Downloaded from Comparison of an intragastric method ofestimating acid output 867 x 40] 40 X DUODENAL ULCER 0 NORMAL E. 30 x E -z 11 " 'A 9X X x O 20 x : cE 20 0 a x Z 20 4) 0 xX a 4 x 0 ll-...-Z - 0 . wU 0 04 OXO PG OXO PG 10 20 30 40 50 NORMAL DUODENAL ULCER OXO (mEq/hr) Fig. 2 Total acid output (mEq per hour) in the two groups ofsubjects. A significant increase in acid Fig. 3 Overall correlation between acid output Oxo to output in response to the Oxo meal was noted only in (by intragastric titration method) and acid output to normal subjects (p < 0 01) (1 mEq = I mmol). pentagastrin (conventional nasogastric aspiration) was good. (R = 0 77, p < 0 01) (I mEq = I mmol). to Oxo seemed to start more rapidly in the control group. In marked contrast to the control group data, there was no statistically significant differ- ence in the mean cumulative acid responses to and, as with the present method, these studies Oxo and to pentagastrin in the duodenal ulcer suffered from the objection that they might not group (Fig. lb). The mean total cumulative acid provide the same stimulus as ordinary solid meals, outputs for the duodenal ulcer to the two because of their different physical characteristics. group Recently stimulants after one hour were within O5 mmol Malagelada et al. (1976) described a of each other. method for measuring gastric secretion and emptying Total acid output at one hour in individual rates after ingestion of an ordinary solid and liquid subjects is shown in Fig.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us