Antenatal Testing: Who, When, How?

Antenatal Testing: Who, When, How?

6/16/2017 Disclosures • I have nothing to disclose Antenatal Testing: Who, When, How? Brian L. Shaffer, MD Associate Professor Maternal Fetal Medicine Doernbecher Fetal Therapy June 15, 2017 Objectives: Fetal monitoring - Who, When, How (What)? FM: Rationale • Prevent Stillbirth • Rationale/Background for Fetal Monitoring (FM) • Physiology • Who? - Risk for IUFD – Hypoxemia & Acidemia Observe fetal behavior changes – Risk: Cause v. Association • Fetal heart rate pattern – Cesarean: APA/Fetal indications? • Fetal activity, tone • When? • ↓ Fetal renal perfusion ↓ Amniotic fluid – Gestational age, Risk factors, clinical scenario Modifiers, Disruptors and Confounders • How (What)? – Maternal medications, Fetal abnormalities (genetic, infectious, structural), Fetal sleep-wake cycles, GA, etc. – Fetal movement Doppler • Can all lead to False alarms (False positives) – Test performance 1 6/16/2017 FM: Rationale - Prevent Stillbirth FM: Iceland – ~1/1000 • US Stillbirth (≥20 weeks): ~6/1000 (2013) • US Stillbirth (≥20 weeks): ~6/1000 (2013) • ~3/1000 (≥28 weeks) • ~3/1000 (≥28 weeks) – Rate ↑ 38 weeks – Rate ↑ 38 weeks – Need indication <39 wks – Need indication <39 wks • Ideally, FM would: • Ideally, FM would: – Identify those at ↑ risk – Identify those at ↑ risk – Excellent test characteristics – Excellent test characteristics • Highly sensitive • Highly sensitive • Few false positives • Few false positives – Goal: 2/1000 – Goal: 2/1000 Smith GCS, AJOG 2005 Smith GCS, AJOG 2005 FM: Rationale Of the following interventions, which is • Promote vaginal delivery/prevent CD? proven to prevent stillbirth? –Placenta “shelf life” 96% –Passenger grows A. Low dose Aspirin –Pelvis static B. Low molecular weight heparin • NTSV CD 25.8% (2015) C. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors – 38 wks: 22% D. Delivery – 40 wks: 25% 3% 0% 0% – Post term: 35% • No data to support his notion • Few data to support FM Barber et. al., Obstet Gynecol 2011 2 6/16/2017 Of the following interventions, which is proven to prevent stillbirth? 1. Low dose Aspirin – 14% in stillbirth/neonatal death 2. Low molecular weight heparin – APA? 3. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors - Early onset IUGR? 4. Delivery – Must balance GA vs. Risk of Stillbirth + FM: May lead to interventions/delivery - Caution Of the following interventions, which is proven to prevent • Must accept downstream possibilities stillbirth? – Abnormal test may be true or false positive • Abnormal test may lead to additional testing 1. Low dose Aspirin – 14% in stillbirth/neonatal death • May lead to maternal anxiety 2. Low molecular weight heparin – APA? • Birth plan • Not preferred or 3. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors - Early onset IUGR? not acceptable to some 4. Delivery – Must balance GA vs. Risk of Stillbirth 3 6/16/2017 FM: May lead to interventions/delivery - Caution Fetal Monitoring: Who? • May lead to recommendation for Delivery (IOL) • Traditionally – those at increased risk for stillbirth – IOL - Side effects/Risks • Stillbirth causes/contributing factors: numerous • Oxytocin: Tachysystole, Hyponatremia – Risk factor (e.g., AMA or prior cesarean) ≠ Cause – Oxytocin not likely to be associated with Autism, Cesarean • Prostaglandins - Fever, nausea & vomiting • Demo : Black, ↓ Education, ↓SES, ↑ Maternal age • Uterine rupture (e.g., TOLAC) • Medical : Diabetes, Hypertension, Renal, Lupus, Cardiac • Amniotic fluid embolism (~5/100,000) • Modifiable Risk (potentially): Obesity, substance use, etc. – If indicated, outcomes are generally improved • Clinical Risk : prior IUFD, prior abruption, multiples, short interval pregnancy, SGA, biomarkers • Unexplained – 25-60% Of the following maternal risk factors, which has Of the following maternal risk factors, which has the the highest adjusted odds ratio for stillbirth? highest adjusted odds ratio for stillbirth? 56% OR 95% CI A. Multiple pregnancy A. Multiple pregnancy 4.59 2.63-8.0 B. Diabetes B. Diabetes 2.50 1.39-4.48 C. Prior Stillbirth C. Prior Stillbirth 5.91 3.18-11.0 D. Smoking 12% D. Smoking 1.55 1.02-2.35 E. AMA ≥ 40 10% 11% 5% 6% E. AMA ≥ 40 2.41 1.24-4.70 F. Drug addiction F. Drug Addiction 2.08 1.12-3.88 SCRN Writing Group JAMA 2011 4 6/16/2017 Fetal Monitoring: How (What?) - Fetal Movement Of the following maternal risk factors, which has the highest adjusted odds ratio for stillbirth? • Decreased fetal movement Fetal jeopardy – Women with stillbirth - >60% reported decreased FM OR 95% CI – Present w FM ~25% abnormal finding/poor outcome 1. Smoking 1.55 1.02-2.35 – Balance: Appropriate alert vs. anxiety & unneeded intervention 2. Drug Addiction 2.08 1.12-3.88 – Routine (all) vs. “High risk” 3. AMA ≥ 40 2.41 1.24-4.70 Numerous techniques 4. Diabetes 2.50 1.39-4.48 • 10 movements in 12 hours of activity (Cardiff) 5. Multiple pregnancy 4.59 2.63-8.0 • 10 movements in 2 hours; 4 in 1h 6. Prior Stillbirth 5.91 3.18-11.0 • Count movements 1h 3/wk: = baseline SCRN Writing Group JAMA 2011 • Subjective decreased fetal movement Fetal Monitoring: How (What?) - Fetal Movement Fetal Monitoring: How (What)? Non-stress test • Cochrane – (RCTs) • FHR will accelerate with movement – No trials compared FM counting with No FM counting – No acidemia, not neurologically depressed – Routine fetal movement monitoring: • Identified more fetuses at ↑ risk of death • Reactivity • No improvement in mortality – Indicates normal fetal autonomic function • Non randomized studies – Non-reactive – sleep vs. other (mat meds) vs. acidemia – Reduction in perinatal death vs. standard care • Semi-fowler - 20 min; Vibroacoustic stim x3 (VAS) • Directed fetal movement counting vs. Optional • Reactive or Non-reactive • All methods may be similar – but women prefer Cardiff count to 10 – ≥2 accels (15pm x 15 sec) and moderate variability – No increase in maternal anxiety – GA: 24-28 weeks – 50% NR; 28-32wks 15% NR – Possibly increased attachment • <32 weeks use 10 x 10 accelerations Mangesi Cochrane 2015; Winje BA BJOG 2016 5 6/16/2017 Fetal Monitoring: How (What)? Non-stress test Fetal Monitoring: How (What)? CST • Contraction Stress Test : Fetal response to stress • Variables : non repetitive and brief <30 sec in duration • Advantage – Identify subtle hypoxia prior to acidosis – No additional follow-up • 3 UCs in 10 min • Variables : ≥3 in 20 min – At least 40 sec in duration – Associated with increased risk for CD NRFHT – IV/Oxytocin: 0.5mU/min – increase q20 (max 10mU/min) • Decelerations : >60 sec – Nipple stimulation – Associated with increased risk: • 50% Faster than IV oxytocin • CD for NRFHT – Contraindications (relative) • Stillbirth • PTL, PPROM, Previa, Vaginal Bleeding, Prior Classical CST Scoring: 2 components Fetal Monitoring: CST Management Component I CST result Follow-up Reactive – moderate variability, accels vs. Nonreactive Reactive-Negative Repeat in 7 days Component II Nonreactive-Negative Repeat -24h; unless <28wk • Negative : no significant decels – variable/late Reactive-Equivocal Repeat w/n 24h • Positive : ≥50% of UCs have late decelerations – ~50% adverse outcomes: CD for NRFHT, death, low Apgars Nonreactive-Equivocal Repeat w/n 12-24h, Obs – Positive CST not a contraindication to trial of labor Reactive-Positive Preterm: BPP, BMZ, cont FHR • Reactive, Positive CST Term: delivery, consider TOL • Equivocal : ≤50% decelerations with UCs Nonreactive-Positive Preterm: BPP, FHR, BMZ, prep – Tachysystole with q2 UCs/decels Term: delivery, CD – UC >90 seconds 6 6/16/2017 Fetal Monitoring: How (What)? Fetal Monitoring: How (What)? • Biophysical Profile –Scoring (0 or 2) • Biophysical Profile (BPP) – 5 components – Score has directly relationship to fetal pH – NST, may be omitted (4 components) • 8/8 or 8/10 or 10/10 - normal (unless oligohydramnios) – Breathing: ≥1 episode for 30 seconds within 30 min – Fetal pH – 7-35-7.40 – Movement: ≥3 discrete body/limb movements w/n 30min – Tone: ≥1 extension of a fetal extremity with return to flexion, or open/close of a hand – Amniotic fluid: 2cm pocket; AFI (chronic) Fetal Monitoring: How (What)? BPP – Score is 6/8 for oligohydramnios • Biophysical Profile –Scoring (0 or 2) Which of the following is TRUE regarding oligohydramnios? – Score has directly relationship to fetal pH • 6/10 – Equivocal A. Appropriate work/up includes a sterile speculum exam B. Deepest vertical pocket results in fewer unnecessary – Fetal pH - 7.32 69% interventions compared with %tile or AFI • 2/10 or 4/10 abnormal C. Delivery at 36-37 weeks is recommend – pH 7.28 (4) D. At <36 weeks, US for EFW, continued surveillance via 16% NST/BPP may be considered 7% 7% – pH 7.18 (2) 2% – pH 7.08 (0) E. All of the above 7 6/16/2017 BPP – Score is 6/8 for oligohydramnios Fetal Monitoring: Biophysical Profile (BPP) Which of the following is TRUE regarding oligohydramnios • If Oligohydramnios – work-up/evaluation vs. delivery 1. Appropriate work/up includes a sterile speculum exam 2. Deepest vertical pocket results in fewer unnecessary – History & PE including SSE interventions compared with %tile or AFI – DVP (2cm pocket without cord) • Fewer unnecessary interventions 3. Delivery at 36-37 weeks is recommend • No increased risk of poor outcomes 4. At <36 weeks, US for EFW, continued surveillance via – Delivery (ACOG): 36-37 weeks NST/BPP may be considered – <36 weeks, Individualize assessment & treatment 5. All of the above • US for EFW – If IUGR Doppler • Frequent/Continuous fetal surveillance NST/BPP • If <37 weeks consider BMZ Fetal Monitoring: How (What)? Fetal Monitoring: Performance • Modified Biophysical Profile • False negative – NST (acute) Stillbirth

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us