Urbanscape Emanation in the Heritage Layers of the Urbanarchipelago UNESCO World Heritage Sites as Core Attractors in Split Urbanarchipelago The city of Split is the second largest city in Croatia. Historic urban landscape of the Split region is a proof of the 25 cen- turies urban tradition. The first Greek colonisation in the 4th century BC is a new heritage layer on the Illyrian proto-ur- ban settlements Salona: Tragurion, Epetion and Pharos. Five projects represent concept of connecting heritage sites and local neighbourhoods creating balance between econo- my of tourism and public places for inhabitants. The projects Salona in Solin were developed by master students at the Faculty of Archi- tecture in Zagreb on the Landscape Architecture Workshop entitled Urbanscape Emanation and Master Thesis under the Kaštela mentorship of Prof.dr.sc. Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci: Iva Batina (Kaštela), Tamara Marić (Split), Nera Nejašmić (Brač), Trogir Maja Šurjak (Hvar) and Ana Topić (Imotski). Split Tragurion Imotski Makarska Brač Diocletian’s Palace SPLIT - linear urban landscape connecting Marjan park- forest and archaeological park Salona in Solin KAŠTELA - Citadel Promenade along the coast through Hvar seven settlements IMOTSKI - connecting hinterland with coastal areas BRAČ - Vista Promenade connections HVAR - connected settlements around the Ager Pharensis natural and cultural heritage Pharos - Ager Pharensis project proposals Split Urbanarchipelago patterns 5 km Prof.dr.sc. Bojana Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci and Tamara Marić The University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Urban Planning, Spatial Planning and Landscape Architecture Research project Heritage Urbanism - Urban and Spatial Planning Models for Revival and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage (HERU HRZZ-2032) [email protected] and [email protected] Design Innovation in Archaeological Contexts The construction of the limit as a synthesis between ethics and semiotics in new architectures Vincenzo P. Bagnato Department of Civil Engineering and Architectural Sciences (DICAR - Bari, Italy) International Research Group on Architecture and Society (GIRAS - Barcelona, Spain) [email protected] An excursion into the Cultural Landscape along the Peloponnesian Railways The train as a “backbone” mechanism along the cultural landscape of Peloponnese! ORMENIO THESSALONIKI PATRAS 1. Ancient Olympia ATHENS 1 Potential as UNESCO’s World heritage site Integral transport system (potential) Touristic arrival gates Problem 1: airports/ports a) Instead of several Administrative borders 2. Chranoi railway bridge sections, the rest of the Normal gauge/double line/electr. network which illustrates Normal gauge/single line/electr. potenial as railway Normal gauge/double line/electr. heritage and touristic Normal gauge/double line/electr. routes is inactive. Inactive/ meter gauge b) For all travellers from Meter gauge/ diesel Athens to the touristic UNESCO’ s World heritage sites hotposts of Peloponnese public transport remains 3. Ancient theater of Epidaurus uncompetitive comparing Anc.Olympia to private transport. Anc.Olympia (long-time trips, poor Mycines Mycines passenger services, inefcient transitions). Athens Athens airport airport 3.5 hrs 3.5 hrs Isochrone diagrams for basic 7 hrs 7 hrs touristic routes comparing indicative public transport and private journeys Public transport (train & bus) Private transport 4. Mystras (Byzantine Despotate of Moreas, 14th-15th cent.) What happens around important railway nodes? Problem 2: R.S Anc.Olympia R.S. Kaifas R.S. Nafplio R.S. Patras a) There is no a strategic plan for future railway and tourist development along the network and mainly around transport hubs improving accessibility and services. b) There is no railway culture but a strong tension to keep railway Archaelogical site of Ancient Thermal baths and protected First capital of Greece after The Western gateway to Olympia (UNESCO). wet land (“Strofilia” forest) by Ottoman empire , neoclassic Europe and the biggest city of stations out of the Poor conditions around RS. Natura 2000. architecture. Peloponnese. historic centres. Non integration of RS in the Industrial heritage. historic center. Actors’ conflict for rail integration in the city. Railway station (R.S), existing If the railway line is a) Classification and enhancement of significant railway stations Railway station (R.S), new/ reactivated/ improved, a b) Synergies of other public transport networks and slow mobility networks (pedestrian, bicycle) under discussion spatial strategy is needed c) Analysis of inner development potential before urban sprawl Railway line toward: d) Combined conventional and/or touristic passenger services Historic centre e) Exploration of the tourist market area in balance with the cultural landscape Collaboration at any cost! Shared market risk vs. hierachical mandates and bureaucratic entitlement Problem 3: IN-FORMAL PLANNING Projects 1. Railway reactivation 2. Railway as part of a) Combine the various and Tourism Unesco Word Heritage site interests between cultural heritage National/ Ministry of Transportation Ministry of Culture management and regional/ Mediator Regions of Western Greece and Peloponnese sustainable tourism. local Independent Political Several prefectures and municipalities team or person b) There are bureacratic OSE (Hellenic Railways Organisation) numerous involved bodies toward a rational 1 stakeholders in each - GAIAOSE (Asset Management) collaborative part of the network - TRAINOSE (or another operator) with limited culture of Port authorities procedure collaboration. International WTO/WTTC (international) UNESCO, ICOMOS, ICOM c) The spatial planning /National EOT (Hellenic Tourism (international) political Organisation) system of Greece 2 orientates to a strong bodies/NGO’s Collaborative procedure : 1. Rhytm (preparatory steps top-down approach. Other SETE (Greek Tourism Various cultural groups and stakeholders Confederation) cooperatives main procedure, meta- Friends of Railway strategies) Business groups, local 2. Problem and solution cooperatives etc. oriented Key stakeholders for tourism and cultural heritage management in the 3. Interaction on local, case of Peloponnese regional and national level References: (1) Innes, J,, Booher, D. (2010) Planning with complexity, Oxon, New York: Routledge 4. Acceptance from all (2) Scholl, B.,Staub, B, Vinzens, M. eds (2013) Test-Planning, A method with future. Zurich: vdf Verlag Map/Diagram sources: Authors, Image sources: 1. http://www.ert.gr/exerevnontas-ton-mystra/ , 2. Guest lecture T.Theofanopoulos 29.09.2015 , various stakeholders 3. http://laterranostra.gr/index.php/mikines/, 4. http://www.panoramio.com/user/5953156?with_photo_id=83960068 Theodora Papamichail, Dr.Ana Peric PhD candidate, Chair of Spatial Development, ETH Zurich Lecturer and PostDoc Fellow, Chair of Spatial Development, ETH Zurich [email protected], [email protected] Assessing urban management policies: An application of an innovative assessment framework on Florence (Italy) as a case study INTRODUCTION 2nd Phase: Linking theory to practice: an original policy assessment framework The conservation and management of historic urban environments is one of the most urgent tasks of our time. The recent definition of the The second methodological step focused on the definition of an original UNESCO Historic Urban Landscape approach and the adoption of policy assessment framework. After a literature review, six existing its related recommendation in 2011 represents one of the most recent assessment frameworks related to policy document analysis in the international contribution in the identification of a new holistic urban field of tourism planning (Simpson, 2001; Ruhanen, 2004), World management framework for reconciling heritage conservation with Heritage site management (Landorf, 2009; World Heritage Centre, urban development. It exemplifies the international recognition 2008; SITI, 2012) and Historic Urban Landscapes (Veldpaus, 2015), were that a new paradigm for urban conservation and management considered the most relevant in relation to the research scope and field. has gradually taken shape since the beginning of the 21st century. However, while relevant for some aspects, none of them was completely adequate This research started from the assumption that in order to implement this to the research scope and an innovative assessment framework was designed. new paradigm of urban conservation toward a better integration with A literature review carried out by the author identified four main principles development, there is a need to assess how existing urban management as characteristic elements of the international approach (“the new frameworks currently operate as well as to develop systematic assessment paradigm”) to urban heritage conservation and management. These key methodologies for an adequate consideration of the gap between concepts were transformed into four specific sections of the assessment cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development. framework developed by the author, working as initial coding categories for carrying out the assessment. Then, four (section 1,2 and 4) or five (section 5) OBJECTIVE qualitative coding items have been associated to each of these sections to delineate specific operational parameters to be considered during the analysis. The objective of this poster is to propose a way to develop a critical assessment of local urban management policies in order AN ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORKS to evaluate if