Essential Microeconomics -1

Essential Microeconomics -1

Essential Microeconomics -1- 1.1 SUPPORTING PRICES Production plan and production set 2 Efficient plan 6 Supporting hyperplane theorem 13 Supporting prices 22 Linear production set 20 Linear Programming problem 40 © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -2- SUPPORTING PRICES Key ideas: convex and non-convex production sets, price based incentives, Supporting Hyperplane Theorem When do prices provide incentives to “support” desired outcomes? Firm or plant: produces n different outputs qq= (1 ,..., qn )using m different inputs zz= (1 ,..., zm ). mn+ A particular production plan is then the input-output vector (,zq )∈ + Production set A firm has available some collection of alternative feasible production plans (production vectors) Let Y be the set of feasible production plans for this plant. This is the plant’s “production set.” © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -3- Production function and production set Consider a firm producing q units of a single output. Let fz() be the maximum output that a firm can produce using input vector z. Therefore output must satisfy the constraint q≤ fz(). The production set Y is the set of feasible plans so Y={(,)|(,) zq zq ≥≤ 0, q f ()} z . Example: Y={(,)|(,) zq zq ≥≤ 0, q 2 z1/2 }, equivalently, Y={( zq , ) | z ≥ 0, 4 z −≥ q2 0} © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -4- New notation: treat inputs as negative numbers 1 production vector y=( y1 ,..., ynm+ ) =−− ( z 11 ,..., zqm , ,..., q n ) Any negative component of y is an input. Any positive component is an output. The production set Y is the set of feasible production vectors. Fig.1.1-1a: Production set * © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -5- New notation: treat inputs as negative numbers 1 production vector y=( y1 ,..., ynm+ ) =−− ( z 11 ,..., zqm , ,..., q n ) Any negative component of y is an input. Any positive component is an output. The production set Y is the set of feasible production vectors. Example: Fig.1.1-1a: Production set Y={( zq , ) | z ≥ 0, 4 z −≥ q2 0}. Using the new notation, a production vector is (y12 , y )= ( − zq ,). The production set is 2 Y ={(yy12 , ) | y 1 ≤−− 0, 4 y 1 y 2 ≥ 0} This set is depicted in Fig 1.1-11b. Fig.1.1-1b: Production set __________________ 1 For a vector, our convention is that if yyjj≥ for all j we write yy≥ . If, in addition, the inequality is strict for some j we write yy> and if the inequality is strict for all j we write yy>> . © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -6- Efficient plan: A production plan y is wasteful if there is another plan in the production set for which outputs are larger and inputs are smaller. Non-wasteful plans are said to be production efficient. Formally the plan y is production efficient if there is no y ∈Y such that yy> . * © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -7- Efficient plan: A production plan y is wasteful if there is another plan in the production set for which outputs are larger and inputs are smaller. Non-wasteful plans are said to be production efficient. Formally the plan y is production efficient if there is no y ∈Y such that yy> . Profit maximization Let pp= (1 ,..., pmn+ ) be the vector of m input and n output prices. mn+ total revenue TR = ∑ pyii im= +1 m m total cost TC = ∑ pzii=∑ pyii() − . i=1 i=1 mn+ m profit π =∑∑pyi i −=⋅ pz ii p y. im=+=11i A production vector is profit maximizing if it solves Max{| p⋅∈ y y Y } y © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -8- Supporting prices When do prices provide an incentive for a firm to produce any efficient production plan? Mathematically, we seek prices that “support” an efficient production plan. Example: a production plant that uses a single input to produce a single output. The input can be purchased at a price p1. Suppose, furthermore, that the plant is part of a large firm. 0 Objective: Produce y2 units of output efficiently. For delivery to another “down-stream” plant within the firm. 0 From the figure, zy11= − units of the input is efficient. Fig.1.1-2a: Production set * © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -9- Supporting prices When do prices provide an incentive for a firm to produce any efficient production plan? Mathematically, we seek prices that “support” an efficient production plan. Example: a production plant that uses a single input to produce a single output. The input can be purchased at a price p1. Suppose, furthermore, that the plant is part of a large firm. 0 Objective: Produce y2 units of output efficiently. For delivery to another “down-stream” plant within the firm. 0 From the figure, zy11= − units of the input is efficient. Fig.1.1-2a: Production set Transfer price A price p2 , paid for each unit delivered to the downstream division. The plant manager’s bonus will be based on the profit π ()y= py11 + py 2 2. © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -10- Two contour sets (or “iso-profit” lines) of π ()y= py11 + py 2 2 are depicted in Fig. 1.1-2a. The steepness of any such line is the input-output price ratio pp12/ . As shown, the ratio is too low since profit is maximized at a point to the North-West of y0 . Fig.1.1-2a Transfer price too high However, with the transfer price lowered appropriately, as in Fig. 1.1-2b, the optimal production plan is achieved. The correct transfer price thus provides the manager with the appropriate incentive. Fig.1.1-2b: Optimal transfer price © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -11- Unfortunately, this approach does not always work. Consider Fig. 1.1-3. 0 Suppose, once again that the output target is y2 units. While y0 is locally profit maximizing, the profit 000 p⋅= y py11 + py 2 2 is negative. Profit is maximized by producing nothing. Fig.1.1-3: No optimal transfer price * © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -12- Unfortunately, this approach does not always work. Consider Fig. 1.1-3. 0 Suppose, once again that the output target is y2 units. 0 While y is locally profit maximizing, the profit 000 p⋅= y py11 + py 2 2 is negative. Profit is maximized by producing nothing. Fig.1.1-3: No optimal transfer price Convex production sets Y is convex if for any yy01, ∈Y every convex combination yλ ≡−(1λλ ) yy01 + ∈Y As we shall see, prices can be used to support all efficient production plans if the production set is convex. © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -13- Proposition 1.1-1: Supporting Hyperplane Theorem Suppose Y ⊂ n is non-empty and convex and y0 lies on the boundary of Y . Then there exists 0 0 p ≠ 0 such that (i) for all y ∈Y , py⋅≤⋅ pyand (ii) for all y ∈intY , py⋅<⋅ py. For a general proof see EM Appendix C. Here we consider the special case in which the convex set Y is an upper contour set of the function h∈1 , that is Y ={yhy | ( ) ≥ 0}. Since y0 is on the boundary of Y, hy()00 = . As long as the gradient vector is non-zero at y0 , the linear approximation of h at y0 is ∂h hy()= hy ()0 + ()( y 00 ⋅− y y ). ∂y Note that hy() and hy() have the same value and gradient at y0 © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -14- In two dimensions, the contour set of the linear approximation is the tangent plane as depicted in Fig. 1.1-4. ≥ 0 If the upper contour set Y={yhy | ( ) hy ( )} is convex as depicted, all the points in Y lie in the upper contour set of h (i.e. the lightly and heavily shaded areas.) In mathematical terms, 0∂h 00 hy()≥ hy () ⇒ ()( y ⋅− y y )0 ≥. Fig.1.1-4: Supporting hyperplane ∂y * © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -15- In two dimensions, the contour set of the linear approximation is the tangent plane as depicted in Fig. 1.1-4. 0 If the upper contour set Y={yhy | ( )≥ hy ( )} is convex as depicted, all the points in Y lie in the upper contour set of h (i.e. the lightly and heavily shaded areas.) In mathematical terms, 0∂h 00 hy()≥ hy () ⇒ ()( y ⋅− y y )0 ≥. Fig.1.1-4: Supporting hyperplane ∂y Formally, we have the following Lemma. ∂h Lemma 1.1-2: If Y ={yhy | ( ) ≥ hy (0 )} is convex then yY∈⇒(y00 )( ⋅ yy − ) ≥ 0. ∂y ∂h To prove Proposition 1.1-1, choose py= − ()0 . Appealing to the lemma, ∂y yY∈ ⇒−pyy ⋅( −0 )0 ≥ that is y∈⇒⋅≤⋅Y py py0 . © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -16- ∂h Lemma 1.1-2: If Y ={yhy | ( ) ≥ hy (0 )} is convex then yY∈⇒(y00 )( ⋅ yy − ) ≥ 0. ∂y Proof: Pick any y in Y . Since Y is convex, all convex combinations of y0 and y lie in Y . That is, for all λ ∈(0,1) , hy()−≥⇒−≥ hy ()000 hy (λ ) hy ()0 where yλ =−+(1λλ ) yy0 . ** © John Riley 3 October 2012 Essential Microeconomics -17- ∂h Lemma 1.1-2: If Y ={yhy | ( ) ≥ hy (0 )} is convex then yY∈⇒(y00 )( ⋅ yy − ) ≥ 0. ∂y Proof: Pick any y in Y . Since Y is convex, all convex combinations of y0 and y lie in Y . That is, for all λ ∈(0,1) , hy()−≥⇒−≥ hy ()000 hy (λ ) hy ()0 where yλ =−+(1λλ ) yy0 . Define g()()((1)λ≡ hyλ =− h λλ y0 += y )( hy 00 +− λ ( y y )).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    40 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us