Origin of Land Plants

Origin of Land Plants

Wodniok et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:104 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/104 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Origin of land plants: Do conjugating green algae hold the key? Sabina Wodniok1†, Henner Brinkmann2†, Gernot Glöckner3, Andrew J Heidel4, Hervé Philippe2, Michael Melkonian1 and Burkhard Becker1* Abstract Background: The terrestrial habitat was colonized by the ancestors of modern land plants about 500 to 470 million years ago. Today it is widely accepted that land plants (embryophytes) evolved from streptophyte algae, also referred to as charophycean algae. The streptophyte algae are a paraphyletic group of green algae, ranging from unicellular flagellates to morphologically complex forms such as the stoneworts (Charales). For a better understanding of the evolution of land plants, it is of prime importance to identify the streptophyte algae that are the sister-group to the embryophytes. The Charales, the Coleochaetales or more recently the Zygnematales have been considered to be the sister group of the embryophytes However, despite many years of phylogenetic studies, this question has not been resolved and remains controversial. Results: Here, we use a large data set of nuclear-encoded genes (129 proteins) from 40 green plant taxa (Viridiplantae) including 21 embryophytes and six streptophyte algae, representing all major streptophyte algal lineages, to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of streptophyte algae and embryophytes. Our phylogenetic analyses indicate that either the Zygnematales or a clade consisting of the Zygnematales and the Coleochaetales are the sister group to embryophytes. Conclusions: Our analyses support the notion that the Charales are not the closest living relatives of embryophytes. Instead, the Zygnematales or a clade consisting of Zygnematales and Coleochaetales are most likely the sister group of embryophytes. Although this result is in agreement with a previously published phylogenetic study of chloroplast genomes, additional data are needed to confirm this conclusion. A Zygnematales/ embryophyte sister group relationship has important implications for early land plant evolution. If substantiated, it should allow us to address important questions regarding the primary adaptations of viridiplants during the conquest of land. Clearly, the biology of the Zygnematales will receive renewed interest in the future. Background pteridophytes (lycophytes and monilophytes) and sper- The ancestors of modern land plants (embryophytes) matophytes with the latter dominating most habitats colonized the terrestrial habitat about 500 to 470 million today. years ago (Ordovician period [1-3]). This event was It is widely accepted that embryophytes evolved from undoubtedly one of the most important steps in the green algae, or more specifically, from a small but diverse evolution of life on earth [4-6], thereby establishing the group of green algae known as the streptophyte algae (char- path to our current terrestrial ecosystems [7] and signifi- ophycean algae). Streptophyte algae and embryophytes cantly changing the atmospheric oxygen concentration together constitute the division Streptophyta, which likely [8,9]. Since this time three major groups of land plants split from the Chlorophyta (all other green algae) about evolved: bryophytes (liverworts, hornworts and mosses), 725-1200 MY ago [10-12]. Streptophyta and Chlorophyta comprise the Viridiplantae, one of the three evolutionary lineages derived from the single primary endosymbiosis of * Correspondence: [email protected] † Contributed equally a cyanobacterium and a eukaryotic host cell [13]. 1Biozentrum Köln, Botanik, Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Straße 47b, 50674 The Streptophyta are characterized by several mor- Köln, Germany phological (e.g., structure of flagellate reproductive cells, Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2011 Wodniok et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Wodniok et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:104 Page 2 of 10 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/104 if present [14]), and physiological characters (e.g., occur- Results rence of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase iso- Zygnematales alone or together with Coleochaetales as form B, GAPDH B [15], leaf peroxisome type of the sister group of embryophytes photorespiration [16,17]). Furthermore, several typical New ESTs were sequenced from the streptophyte algae embryophyte traits have evolved within the streptophyte Klebsormidium subtile, Coleochaete scutata,andChara algae (e.g., cell division using a phragmoplast, structure vulgaris and the chlorophyte alga Pyramimonas parkeae of the cellulose synthase complex [4]). However, the (see Material and Methods for details). We assembled a streptophyte algae differ greatly in cellular organization data set of 129 expressed genes (30,270 unambiguously and reproduction. Molecular phylogenies indicate that aligned amino acid positions) for 40 viridiplant taxa the Mesostigmatales and Chlorokybales form a clade including six streptophyte algae (Mesostigma, Klebsormi- that is a sister-group to all other streptophytes, currently dium, Chara, Coleochaete, Closterium and Spirogyra) containing only two genera: the biflagellate Mesostigma using the chlorophytes as outgroup to root the trees. and the sarcinoid (non-motile cells occurring in The data set was analyzed by maximum likelihood packages of four) Chlorokybus [18,19]. The Klebsormi- (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods using several diales, which is comprised of filamentous algae [14], is evolutionary models. We first evaluated the fits of the the sister group to the remaining streptophyte algae and models to our data set using cross validation (Table 1). the embryophytes. The phylogenetic position of the The site-heterogeneous CATGTR model is the best of other three groups of streptophyte algae is currently the four models under study. The site-heterogeneous controversial. The conjugating green algae (Zygnema- CAT model, which assumes uniform exchangeability tales) today represent the most species-rich group of rates among amino acids, has a much better fit than the streptophyte algae and are characterized by their unique site-homogeneous LG+F and GTR models, and is just mode of sexual reproduction. They have completely lost slightly worse than the CATGTR model. Interestingly, flagellate cells, using instead conjugation for sexual the data set is sufficiently large to accurately estimate the reproduction [20]. The conjugating green algae include amino acid exchangeability rates, since the GTR model both filamentous and unicellular forms. The last two has a better fit to the data than the LG+F model, where groups of streptophyte algae, the Coleochaetales and these parameters were learned from numerous align- Charales, are filamentous with apical growth and an ments [28]. The simplifying assumption of equal rates of oogamous mode of sexual reproduction. Based on mor- the CAT model, albeit biologically unsound and rejected phological complexity, either of the latter two groups by cross validation (in favor of the CATGTR model), has have been suggested to be the sister group of the the advantage of allowing a significant increase in embryophytes [4]. In many illustrations referring to the computational speed [29], and was therefore used for evolution of streptophyte algae and embryophytes in bootstrap analysis. textbooks [e.g. [21]] or review articles [14,22,23], the Despiteverydifferentmodelfits,thesametreetopol- Charales (stoneworts) are depicted as the sister group of ogy (Figure 1) was obtained in all analyses. Bootstrap the embryophytes. The strongest support for a sister support values were computed for both methods, using group relationship between Charales and embryophytes the site homogeneous GTR+Γ4 model (ML) and the site was obtained in a phylogenetic analysis using four genes heterogeneous CAT+Γ4 model (BI). The posterior prob- (atpB and rbcL [plastid], nad5 [mitochondria], and SSU abilities of all nodes for both the CAT+Γ4andCATGTR RNA [nuclear] using 26 streptophyte algae, eight embry- +Γ4 models were 1 except for three nodes (0.99 each, ophytes, and five chlorophytes and one glaucophyte as indicated with an asterisk in Figure 1). The molecular outgroup [24]). In contrast, analyses using plastid LSU phylogeny of embryophytes and chlorophyte algae (out- and SSU ribosomal RNAs or whole chloroplast genomes group) is in agreement with other recently published support the Zygnematales or a clade consisting of phylogenies [14,23,30-32] and supports the monophyly of Zygnematales and Coleochaetales as sister group of the liverworts and mosses which is however still a matter of embryophytes [25-27]. debate [33]. The phylogeny of the streptophyte algae is Here we use ESTs from six different streptophyte algae for a phylogenomic analysis including 21 embryo- Table 1 Cross-validation results for the data set of 40 phytes. We show that the Charales are most likely not viridiplant species and 30,270 positio ns (a positive score the sister group of the embryophytes, instead our ana- indicates a better fit) lyses indicate that either the conjugating green algae or Model compared Likelihood difference (±SD) less likely a sister group formed by Coleochaete

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us