2. Geological Map of Hokusai Quadrangle Jack Wright1, David A

2. Geological Map of Hokusai Quadrangle Jack Wright1, David A

Geological mapping of the Hokusai (H05) quadrangle of Mercury: Status update Jack Wright1, David A. Rothery1, Matt R. Balme1, Susan J. Conway2 1School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK [email protected] 2CNRS, Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, Université de Nantes, France @wrightplanet 1. Status update 3. Resurfacing modes and timings? 180° H01 Mariner 10 MESSENGER data are being 270° North Pole 90° The first global geological map of Mercury has two used to construct 1:3M-scale Borealis MESSENGER Fig. 1. Mercury geomorphic plains units: smooth and intercrater plains mapping quadrangles. geological maps of Mercury [1– 0° [9]. On quadrangle maps, these can be subdivided, 66° 66° Mariner 10 maps are 6] (Fig. 1). These will provide H03 H02 H05 H04 being superseded by adding information about geological processes. Below 180° Shakespeare 270° Victoria 0° Hokusai 90° Raditladi 180° context and science targets for MESSENGER maps. are important plains types within Hokusai. 21.5° 21.5° the ESA/JAXA BepiColombo H02, H03 and H04 are 35°E 40°E 45°E mission to Mercury [7]. We H08 H07 H06 H10 H09 H08 published [1–3]. H05, Fig. 3. Low density of Tolstoj Beethoven Kuiper Derain Eminescu Tolstoj superposing impact present the first geological map -21.5° -21.5° H06, H07, H10 and H14 are underway [4–6]. craters. Sharp of the Hokusai (H05) quadrangle 180° 270° 0° 90° 180° H12 H11 H14 H13 H08 and H11 are contacts with adjacent Michaelangelo Discovery Debussy Neruda 60°N ± (Fig. 2). Mapping within Borealis scheduled [4]. H01 is units. Abundant Planitia is complete. Mapping is -66° 0° -66° being mapped in a wrinkle ridges, some progressing in the south- H15 separate effort [8]. forming rings 10s– 270°South Pole 90° western cratered plains. Bach 100s km across indicating impact 180° SMOOTH craters buried by 100km 'smooth plains' [9,10] multiple lava flows. 2. Geological map of Hokusai quadrangle 35°E 40°E Fig. 4. More textured Geological units 0° 10°E 30°E 50°E 70°E 90°E Crater rims plains containing smooth plains 0° crest of subdued or buried crater 70°N 10°E 90°E 70°N isolated patches of intercrater plains crest of crater rim (diam. > 20km) smooth plains within 30°E 70°E ± smooth crater infill 50°E crest of small crater rim (diam. > 5km) low-lying regions hummocky crater infill 30°N (e.g., secondary pyroclastic deposits Structures crater chains). Occurs Crater materials 60°N 60°N irregular pit crater graben close to typical c3 (fresh) wrinkle ridge ring smooth plains. c2 Hokusai crater ridge Widespread in SE c1 (degraded) Rustaveli wrinkle ridge 100km H05. 50°N 50°N Borealis Planitia 8°E 10°E 40°N 40°N Fig. 5. Plains containing abundant ± flat-floored craters 28°N with degraded rims. 30°N 30°N Intervening smooth patches 10s of km across. Widespread in Unity Rupes SW H05. 20°N 20°N 50km Rachmaninoff 'intercrater plains' [9,10] 26°N 20°E 0° 90°E Fig. 6. Plains with abundant, relatively 10°E 80°E immature secondary ± craters from nearby 25°N Contacts 20°E 70°E Faults primary impacts. No contact (certain) 30°E 60°E fault (uncertain) smooth patches. contact (uncertain) 40°E 50°E + + thrust (certain) Diffuse contacts. km Least widespread 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 CRATERED 'intercrater plains' Fig. 2. Current status of geological map of H05. ~1:7M scale. Transparent geological units overlain on MESSENGER ~166 meters sub-type in H05. per pixel global monochrome mosaic basemap. 5° overlap with surrounding quadrangles for boundary matching at a later date. 50km References: [1] Galluzzi V. et al. (2016) J. Maps, 12, 227–238. [2] Guzzetta L. et al. (2017) J. Maps, 13, 227–238. [3] Mancinelli Acknowledgements: JW is funded by UK P. et al (2016), J. Maps, 12, 190–202. [4] Galluzzi V. et al. (2018) Mercury: Current and Future Science of the Innermost Planet, Science and Technology Facilities Council Abstract #6075. [5] Malliband C. C. et al. (2018) Mercury: Current and Future Science of the Innermost Planet, Abstract #6091. (STFC) training grant ST/N50421X/1. JW is [6] Pegg D. L. et al. (2018) Mercury: Current and Future Science of the Innermost Planet, Abstract #6021. [7] Benkhoff J. et al. grateful to the Lunar and Planetary Science (2010) Planet. Space Sci., 58, 2–20. [8] Ostrach L. R. et al. (2018) LPS XLIX, Abstract #1747. [9] Kinczyk M. J. et al. (2018) Institute (LPI) for granting him a 2018 LPI Mercury: Current and Future Science of the Innermost Planet, Abstract #6123. [10] Whitten J. L. et al. (2014) Icarus, 241, 97– Career Development Award to attend the 49th 113. LPSC. SJC is supported by CNES..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us