Impact Factor Value 4.046 e-ISSN: 2456-3463 International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Science, Vol. 4, No.1, 2019 www.ijies.net Analysis of Priority Scale of Road Handling In Murung Raya Regency Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method Mohammad Rofiq1, Iphan F. Radam2 1Graduate Student of Transportation Engineering and Management, Magister Study Program of Civic Engineering, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia 2Associate Professor Study Program of Civil Engineering, Lambung, Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia Abstract: Prioritization of road handling is very on the Decision of Murung RayaRegency number necessary in supporting the equalization of road 188.45/150/2016 on the Establishment of Roads by infrastructure construction to fulfill the public needs of Their Status as Regency Roads, there are 173 regency the people of Murung Raya Regency. In the present roads, with total road length of 919,54 km which is study, the reviewed criteria were non-technical criteria spread in 10 (ten) sub-districts[1]. Murung Raya (development planning deliberation, public proposal, Regency is split from North Barito Regency [2]. special policy and fund availability) and technical During the course of development in Murung Raya criteria (road class, Average Daily Traffic (LHR), road Regency, there should be equalization of development in damage, terrain, road function and land use). The all fields, requiring supporting factors such as stable and purpose of this study was analyzing the criteria which maintained roads. Currently, in determining road affected the prioritization of road handling. The data construction plan, Department of Public Work and analysis used Wilcoxon rank-test to measure the level of Spatial Layout performs regular field survey every year significance of the data of questionnaire result and and submits activity proposals through development Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to planning deliberation (musrenbang), i.e. from village determine the prioritization of road handling. Based on development planning deliberation, sub-district AHP analysis, technical criteria (road class, Average development planning deliberation, to regency Daily Ttaffic (LHR), damage level, terrain, road function development planning deliberation, but often misses the and land use) which scores 85.71%, higher than non- targets and neglects technical criteria, benefit and cost. technical factors (development planning deliberation, Due to the complexity of the problems in the field, public proposal, special policy and fund availability) which are affected by aspects such as: road damage, which scores 14.29%. The road damage sub-criteria average daily traffic (LHR), terrain, road function, and (severe, moderate and mild) scores 40.05% as a very regional development? Therefore, a method which can influential element, while land use sub-criteria accommodate all of the aspects and anticipate gaps is (protected zone, commercial zone, office zone, industrial necessary. One of the methods which can be used by zone, residential zone, productive zone and non- decisions makers is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) productive zone) scores 4.2% was the sub-criteria with which is often used to help in decision making, including the lowest effect. prioritization of road handling. Keywords: Road handling, reviewed criteria, AHP method 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Definition of road I-INTRODUCTION The definition of road is the whole section of a street, including the complementary constructions for public The government of Murung Raya Regency has made traffic which is below the ground, above the ground, many efforts to implement regional autonomy as well as under the water surface, and above the water surface, possible, including repairing road infrastructure. Based except for railway and cableway [3]. Road drives the 11 Impact Factor Value 4.046 e-ISSN: 2456-3463 International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Science, Vol. 4, No.1, 2019 www.ijies.net development of all development area units to enhance 6. Repeating steps 3,4 and 5 for every level of regional development. Road classifications by function hierarchy. are arterial road, collector road, local road, 7. Calculating eigenvector of every paired environmental road [4][5]. To regulate road use and comparison matrix. fulfill the needs of motorized transportation, road is 8. Checking the consistency of the hierarchy. If the divided into several classes, i.e. Class I Road, Class II value is more than 10 percent, then data Road, Class III Road, Special Class Road [6].Road judgment must be improved. classifications by terrain for geometric planning areplain, The data analysis framework with Analytical hill and mountain [7].Meanwhile, the categories of road Hierarchy Process (AHP) is presented in Figure2. damage are severely damage, moderately damaged, and mildly damaged [8] 3. RESEARCH METHOD 2.2 Wilcoxon Test The AHP comparison assessment scale is made based 3.1 Research flow on the categorization or classification of the level of The research procedure followed the following flow: importance and existence of relation between data. 1. Research background which is the importance of Data with wide distribution of answer has better objective and accurate research on the analysis of median than modus because median still considers all priority scale of road handling using AHP answers. The median selected to be the value which method in Murung Raya Regency. can represent the preferences of all respondents is 2. Formulation, purpose, limitation and benefit of obtained using nonparametric tests, such as signed research. test or Wilcoxon-signed rank test [9][10].Wilcoxon 3. Literature review is necessary to understand the test evaluates the shift in distribution of difference to theoretical basis which supports the purpose to the right or left of the original median value or be achieved in the study original hypothesis value (θ). The null hypothesis 4. Formulation of methodology is necessary to (Ho) is median value which is equal toθ,while determine the research stages. alternative hypothesis (Ha) is median value which 5. Arranging hierarchy to design the desired isn’t equal to θ. Ho is rejected if the P-value is hierarchal structure for the present study and to smaller than the set significance value (α).Specific prepare questionnaire questions for respondents. value of α for one direction can use0.05, 0.025, 0.01 6. Collecting data from related departments, such as or 0.005 and for two ways can use0.1, 0.05, 0.02, or Department of Public Work and Spatial Layout, 0.01. P-value is obtained from t-distribution with Regional Development Planning and standardized test statistic (z) value from Wilcoxontest Development Research Agency, Consulting [11]. supervisor/planner, Housing and Settlement Department, and Development Administration 2.3 Processes in Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) section of the Regional Secretary of Murung Method Raya Regency The processes in AHP method are as follows [12][13] : 7. Processing and analyzing the data using 1. Defining problem and determining the desired Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and solution. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test which were selected 2. Making hierarchal structure which starts from from various referenced literatures. general purpose, followed by criteria and 8. Concluding research results and making alternative possibilities at the lowest level of recommendations. criteria. 3. Making paired comparison matrix which 3.2 Data Collection describes relative contribution or the effect of The data collected in the present study consisted of every element on the criterion above. primary data and secondary data. 4. Making paired comparison to obtain x ((n-1)/2) 1. Primary data, collected from a survey using judgments (decisions), with n being the number questionnaire and interview methods on respondents of compared elements. in Department of Public Work and Spatial Planning, 5. Calculating eigen value and testing its Regional Development Planning and Development consistency. If not consistent, then data Research Agency, Consulting supervisor/planner, Housing and Settlement Department, and collection is repeated. 12 Impact Factor Value 4.046 e-ISSN: 2456-3463 International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Science, Vol. 4, No.1, 2019 www.ijies.net Development Administration section of the 5 (five) proposed levelsof hierarchy as presented in Regional Secretary of Murung Raya Regency. Figure3 They are: 2. Secondary data, collected from Department of Level 1.The first level described the target of the Public Work and Spatial Planning and Regional decision to be made which was at the top of the Development Planning and Development Research hierarchy and also the main purpose of this study, i.e. Agency. determining the priority scale of road handling. Level 2.The second level consisted of2 choices based on technical and non-technical criteria which were reviewed in determining the priority scale of road handling. Level 3.The third level submitted assessment sub criteria of technical and non-technical criteria. Technical criteria was categorized into road class, ADT, road damage, terrain, road function and land use. Nontechnical criteria were categorized into development planning deliberation, public proposal, special policy and fund availability. Fig.1-The research flow is presented 3.2 Data Collection The data collected in the present study consisted of primary data and secondary data. 1. Primary data, collected