A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Cochrane, David Troy Doctoral Thesis What’s Love Got to Do with It? Diamonds and the Accumulation of De Beers, 1935-55 Provided in Cooperation with: The Bichler & Nitzan Archives Suggested Citation: Cochrane, David Troy (2015) : What’s Love Got to Do with It? Diamonds and the Accumulation of De Beers, 1935-55, The Bichler and Nitzan Archives, Toronto, http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/469/ This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/157995 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ www.econstor.eu What’s Love Got to Do with It? Diamonds and the Accumulation of De Beers, 1935-55 David Troy Cochrane A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Social & Political Thought York University Toronto, Ontario December 2015 ©David Troy Cochrane 2015 ii !ABSTRACT What is accumulation? Visibly, accumulation is a quantitative process, demarcated in financial quantities. However, what is the meaning of those quantities? This question has been the subject of great debate within political economic thought. A new theory of accumulation, capital as power (CasP), argues that the financial quantities of accumulation express the distribution of power among the owners of capital over the qualitatively diverse, complex and mutating social order. With this dissertation, I explore the relationship between the quantities and qualities of accumulation by examining the De Beers diamond cartel, focusing on the period 1935-55. What does it mean to say ‘capital is power’ in the specific setting of the global diamond assemblage? Research and analysis led me to focus on four important relationships that De Beers had to establish, maintain and transform in its struggle for differential accumulation: with diamonds themselves; with potential and actual diamond buyers; with governments; and, with families, especially the Oppenheimer family that controlled De Beers for over 80 years. iii !ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My amazing partner, Shelley Boulton, deserves more praise than I can give for putting up with this PhD. Together with our children, Tigerlily and Daisy, she reminded me that life doesn’t begin and end with my scholarly work. I could enjoy this project only because they occasionally freed me of its seemingly endless demands. Time spent with my family was a respite that helped me survive this degree. They cannot be thanked enough. Next, I have to give special thanks to my supervisor, Jonathan Nitzan. It was his work with Shimshon Bichler that brought me to York. For a disillusioned economics major, Nitzan and Bichler’s theory of capital as power offered a critical opening for my desire to understand business. I feel fortunate to have encountered an exciting, new intellectual framework like capital as power so early in its development and I hope to continue to participate in developing the theory and its analytical practices. My engagement with capital as power depended on more than just Professor Nitzan. There were thoughtful, inquisitive fellow travellers similarly disillusioned with political economy, seeking a different approach to understanding the capitalist social order. Discussions with Sandy Hager, Joseph Baines, Jong-chul Kim, James McMahon and Joe Francis helped to develop my perspective on capitalist power. Jordan Brennan and Sean Starrs were frequent interlocutors offering my nascent ideas vociferous debate. The presenters and attendees at the Forum on Capital as Power conferences also deserve thanks for the numerous intriguing ideas and provocative criticisms they offered. I have to acknowledge the importance of three other conferences influential for this project. The first was the 2008 Great Lakes Radical Political Economy Conference, where I received a positive, though critical, reception to my first presentation on capital as power. In particular, Daniel Moure, who was familiar with capital as power and happened to give one of the most cogent presentations I had ever heard, complimented my presentation. Considering he was someone I had only just met, his affirmation was very meaningful and I continue to value our conversations, even if he is half a world away. The second important conference was the Strategies of Critique organized annually by my department. In 2009, the topic was ‘Love.’ As a political economist, I was unsure what I could possibly present on. But, the idea of love led me to diamonds, which led me to De Beers. The third pivotal conference was the 2009 Rethinking iv Marxism conference, where I presented on De Beers for the second time. After my presentation, Tim Di Muzio encouraged me – against my resistance – to make it my dissertation topic. The other members of my committee, Professors Mark Peacock and J.J. McMurtry, deserve thanks for helping oversee this project. Their open-mindedness to novel approaches to political economy, combined with their bases of knowledge, helped me to see many aspects of this dissertation in new ways. Additionally, I’d like to give thanks to two of the professors for whom I was a teaching assistant. Professor Sharada Srinivasan encouraged my eclectic interpretations and offered much needed support and cajoling. Professor John Dwyer offered a model both for dynamic teaching and for philosophical curiosity. I have been fortunate to make and keep some amazing friendships with people who have shown genuine interest in my research (and feigned some also, I’m sure). Certain friends will always be more important at certain times. But, their overall importance cannot be quantified or ranked, so, in order of when we met, as best as I can remember, thank you: Shawn Fulton, Scott Fulton, Laine Gable, Sarah Garden, Pete Garden, Colin Hall, Kendra Kemble, Jenn Hannotte, Jo- Anne McArthur, Adam Evans, karen emily suurtamm, Karen Hawley, Steph Kimball, Gordie Wornoff, Zac Vance, Linsey McGoey, Jeff Monaghan, Andréa Schmidt, Pete Vance, Kelly Fritsch, Eliot Che, Angela Mooney, Manon Gagnon, Lee Knuttila, Alessandra Renzi, Alison Porter and Jill Hannotte. Unfortunately, undoubtedly there are numerous others who deserve recognition, but whose importance I have failed to recall. I’m nervously certain that after this entire thing is finalized I will conjure up an overlooked friend from the past. If you are one of those people who deserved to be mentioned, I apologize, although I cannot help but wonder what you’re doing surveying the acknowledgements of a PhD dissertation. Missing from the list above are a few friends who have provided concrete material support for this dissertation in the form of research assistance, housing, copy editing, feedback or something else of tangible consequence for the project. They may consider their assistance a little thing, but its role in this work is irreducibly important. Thank you karen emily suurtamm, Etienne ‘You’ll always be Steve to me’ Turpin, Jeff Monaghan, Aaron Gordon, Laura Kane, Andréa Schmidt and Anna Feigenbaum. Two groups of friends outside those listed above also deserve to be mentioned. The first are the people I got to know through the online photography site Flickr. Their shared passion for photography gave me an outlet for a creative pursuit that did not fit into my graduate studies. v Online communities are real communities and this one deserves to be acknowledged here. The second group of friends are the newly developing ones at West Toronto Crossfit. I want to mention by name my coaches Jeff MacWilliams and Zeyna Shah, plus my frequent lifting partner, Ben Wilkinson. Without them, the final year of writing this dissertation would have been immeasurably more difficult. Last, but not least, thanks goes to my extended family. I grew up in the same small town that both of my parents grew up in. I was surrounded by aunts and uncles and cousins. I didn’t realize, at the time, what a special thing that was. But, now, as an adult, on the rare occasions when we get together, the timelessness of our bond becomes apparent. There are few people I feel more comfortable with than these people whom chance made me related to. The same is true, only more so, for my brothers, Cory and Ryan Cochrane. The three of us are very different people. I suspect they’ve considered me a big weirdo for our entire lives. Like all brothers, we fought. But, I know that they, together with their amazing wives and children, Christa, Holly, Kenzie, Kaida, Vaya and Hayes, will always throw open their doors for me and my family. As we get older, the time apart becomes longer. Yet, we’re always welcome. It is heartening to know that their homes are our homes too, at least for three days at a time! Among all my amazing family members special mention must be given to my Auntie Reenie Barnett. Without her support half of the research for this dissertation would have been impossible.