Hurricane Fifi and the 1974 Autumn Migration in El Salvador

Hurricane Fifi and the 1974 Autumn Migration in El Salvador

condor, 82:212-218 @I The Cooper Ornithological Society 1980 HURRICANE FIFI AND THE 1974 AUTUMN MIGRATION IN EL SALVADOR WALTER A. THURBER ABSTRACT.-In the autumn of 1974 the migration pattern in El Salvador had several unusual features, too many to have been merely coincidental: 1) delayed arrival of certain early migrants whose appearance overlapped with that of later migrants; 2) unprecedented numbers of a few species; 3) the appearance of several rarely seen or previously unreported species; 4) exten- sion of winter ranges of a few species which was maintained for several years after. These events were closely associated with Hurricane Fifi (17-20 Sep- tember) and to a lesser extent with Hurricane Carmen (l-6 September). I attribute the unusual features of the 1974 migration to Hurricane Fifi (pos- sibly augmented by Carmen) after comparison of routes and schedules of early migrants with the route, dates, wind directions, and velocities of Fifi. I suggest that other hurricanes have affected and will affect migration through Middle America but that serious disruptions are probably rare and unpre- dictable. In the course of my 10 years of netting and METHODS AND SOURCES OF DATA banding birds in El Salvador, Central Amer- From my field notes and netting records I selected data ica, the fall of 1974 was exceptional for the which show the unusual nature of the 1974 migration. early migration pattern and for the arrival of For comparison I summarized relevant information for several uncommon and previously unre- other years as given by my notes and the literature. My field notes extend from 1966, my netting records from ported species. These events aroused my 1969. I have onerated banding stations for about one interest but I did not note their conjuncture month a quarter, each station for 12-14 days, using 15- with Hurricane Fifi until almost three years 20 nets. One station at Cerro Verde (13”50N.’ 89”38W:’ later. Then in 1977, I encountered an un- 2,000 m elevation) has been used regularly once a precedented wave of Canada Warblers (Wil- quarter; the others were used less regularly and for only two to four years. Since 1969 I have maintained sonia canadensis) and learned that Hurri- one lowland station to complement Cerro Verde. cane Anita had crossed the Gulf of Mexico Dickey and van Rossem (1938) provided almost all shortly before. that is known about migrants in El Salvador before Storms are known to affect bird move- 1966. Van Rossem collected for 20 months in 1912 and 1925-27. His data were not strictly comparable to net- ments. Hurricanes moving northward along ting data but he was a dedicated observer who anno- North Americas’ eastern seaboard force tated richly his impressions of abundance. Of other south-bound migrants and sea birds far in- visiting ornithologists, only Marshall (1943) added in- land (Pettingill 1970:271). Lowery (1946: formation pertinent to this paper. 192) and Mayhew (1949:403) described in- The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin- istration provided general information on cyclonic stances of birds caught in hurricanes. Bagg storms, details of Hurricanes Carmen, Fifi, and Anita, (1967:87-121) showed how severe storms and surface maps for the periods of these hurricanes. over the North Atlantic brought spectacular numbers of Eurasian Lapwings (Vanellus MIGRATION PATTERNS IN vanellus) to North America in 1927 and NORTHERN MIDDLE AMERICA 1966. Raffaele and Roby (1977:338-342) Lack of band recoveries limits understand- credited the 1960 Hurricane Donna with in- ing of migration patterns in Middle Ameri- troducing the Lesser Antillean Bullfinch ca. Approximate routes can be inferred from (Lorigilla noctis) into the Virgin Islands. species accounts in regional summaries, e.g. Fisk (1979:226) associated 1969 Hurricane Miller et al. (1957), Paynter (1955), Russell Gerda with an exceptional wave of migrants (1964), Land (1970), and Monroe (1968). at her banding station in south Florida. I Knowledge of migration schedules is in propose that Hurricane Fifi was responsible general limited to earliest recorded dates in for the unusual features of the 1974 fall mi- species accounts in Bent (1949, 1950, 1953, gration in El Salvador and that such storms 1958, 1968), Russell (1964), Land (1970), can and do affect migration patterns in Mid- and Monroe (1968); these dates may not dle America. represent normal arrival dates. 12121 HURRICANES AFFECTING MIGRATION 213 FIGURE 1. Tracks of Caribbean tropical cyclones, 1974: (1) H urricane Carmen, 29 August-9 September; (2) Hurricane Fifi, 14-22 September. Solid circles mark positions at 07:OO E.S.T. (Adapted from J. Hope 1975: 9, Fig. 10.) Passerines originating in western North ly August, as judged by earliest recorded America tend to migrate through western dates for Orchard Orioles (Zcterus spurius) Mexico and the interior highlands. Those and Northern Orioles (I. galhula). Other that arrive in Guatemala are usually at or passerines, e.g. Canada Warblers, begin to near the southern limit of their winter range arrive at the Gulf of Mexico in mid-August. (Land 1970:18-19; see also Monroe 1968: Migration seems to continue at least into 390). Western migrants are sheltered from late October and possibly into November in the effect of most Caribbean hurricanes, but Central America. in 1974 Fifi crossed the isthmus and, al- Species migrating along the Atlantic though its intensity diminished after mak- coast, especially those crossing the Gulfs of ing landfall, it continued to cause devasta- Mexico and Honduras, or flying offshore, tion along its path. are vulnerable to hurricanes that approach Some eastern species of migrants follow or skirt the coast. The season of tropical the coast around Yucatan, some bypass Yu- storms (winds 63-119 km/h) and hurricanes catan at the base of the peninsula, and some (over 119 km/h) extends from May to De- cross the Gulf of Mexico. The extent of cember but nearly all severe storms ap- trans-Gulf migration in autumn is uncertain proaching Middle America have done so although large-scale flights in spring are re- between mid-August and mid-October (Cry ported (Lowery 1951). Paynter (1951: 113- 1965:140-147, charts), a period which co- lI4) provided limited direct evidence of incides with the autumn migration of many south-bound crossings and inferences can species. A severe cyclonic storm can affect be drawn from the presence of fall migrants migrants for three to seven days depending on off-shore islands (see species accounts in upon whether the routes intersect at right Paynter 1955 and Miller et al. 1957). Many angles or tend to parallel each other. south-bound migrants continue along the The time and place where migrants may Caribbean slope, some probably crossing encounter severe storms vary. In the decade the Gulf of Honduras (see Monroe 1968: before Fifi (1964-1973) there were two sea- 390). Other species spread out onto the Pa- sons with no storms along the Atlantic coast cific slope upon reaching southern Mexico of Middle America. In the other eight years and Guatemala. there were six tropical storms and eight hur- For passerines along the Atlantic, the fall ricanes in the western Gulf of Mexico. Yu- migration season begins in late July and ear- catan was battered by six hurricanes and 214 WALTER A. THURBER FIGURE 2. Isobars showing position of Hurricane Fifi at 07:30 E.S.T., 17 September 1974. Arrows, flying with the wind, give wind directions at reDortinrr shim and land stations. (Adapted from Surface Analysis Map 122 17 Septembe; 1974, WMO Regional Center, %l&i.) eight tropical storms, including some of the ber and as a hurricane on the 17th (Fig. 2). above, which crossed it, brushed its tip, or Its center entered the Gulf of Honduras on paralleled its coasts. Farther south, three 18 September, made landfall in Guatemala tropical storms passed the mouth of the Gulf on the 19th, and crossed to the Pacific, re- of Honduras, one hurricane crossed it, and named Orlene. The maximum sustained one hurricane travelled its length, the route wind velocity was 176 km/h, attained in the followed later by Fifi but with less destruc- Gulf. Among the highest velocities reported tion. (Data from Cry 1965.) on land were 213 km/h on Isla de Guanja, 158 km/h at La Ceiba, Honduras, and gusts up to 185 km/h in Belize. Heavy rains, up HURRICANES AND MIGRANTS to 50 cm, fell for more than two days in Hon- CHARACTERISTICS OF HURRICANE FIFI duras, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Belize. In 1974 two hurricanes made landfall in (Data from Hope 1975:15-16, Table 5.) Middle America; Hurricane Carmen ap- Typical of all Caribbean cyclonic storms, proached and crossed Yucatan between 1 the winds of Fifi spiraled inward counter- and 6 September, and Hurricane Fifi ap- clockwise (Fig. 2). Birds in the northern and proached and entered Central America be- northwestern sectors encountered winds tween 17 and 20 September (Fig. 1). The which tended to push them inland; birds in dates and routes suggest that Fifi was the the western sector were pushed southward. more closely associated with the unusual The center of such a storm need not actually wave of early migrants at Cerro Verde but intersect a migration route to affect mi- two hurricanes close together may have had grants; the winds sweep a wide belt. Fifi a cumulative effect. may have been affecting migrants before Fifi, moving in from the Atlantic, was noon on 17 September when a ship 125 km classified as a tropical storm on 16 Septem- east of Yucatan (the northernmost reporting HURRICANES AFFECTING MIGRATION 215 station in Fig. 2) reported winds of 111 km/ colubris), about on schedule (earliest date h from the northeast (Hope 1965).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us