1 REPORTABLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.649 OF 2018 MRINALINI PADHI ..PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS WITH MA No.2053 and 2131/2019 in WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1094 OF 2019 O R D E R ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. The petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India to direct an investigation/enquiry into the disappearance of the keys to the Ratna Bhandar of the Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri. It has also been prayed that an inventory of the valuables stored at the Ratna Bhandar of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri be taken and to direct appointment of an expert committee to submit a report to this Court for preservation and management of property and valuables of Shri Jagannath Temple. Prayer has also been made to provide express darshan to all the devotees visiting Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri. Reliance has been placed on the decision of this Court in Sarika v. 2 Administrator, Shri Mahakaleshwar Mandir Committee, Ujjain, M.P. & ors., 2018 (6) SCALE 651 (Civil Appeal No.4676 of 2018). 2. While entertaining the petition, this Court has passed an order on 8.6.2018, directing District Judge, Puri a submit a report. Later on, vide order dated 5.7.2018, in addition to order dated 8.6.2018, some more directions were issued and were summed up as follows: ª19. We may sum-up our directions in today's orders, in addition to the orders dated 8.6.2018, as follows: i) Report of the District Judge dated 26.6.2018 is accepted in principle and action to be taken by the temple administration. ii) District Judge, Puri may send further report, if any by 31.8.2018, preferably by e-mail. iii) The State Government may submit report of the Committee constituted by it on or before 31.8.2018. iv) The Central Government may constitute its Committee, as already directed, within two weeks from today and place its interim report on record of this Court on or before 31.8.2018. v) Copy of the Report of the District Judge may be placed on the websites of the temple management, Ministry of Culture and website of the Supreme Court for two weeks. vi) The directions in the order dated 8.6.2018 may be complied with by all concerned and non-compliance thereof may be reported to this Court for appropriate action if necessary. vii) The temple management may consider, subject to regulatory measures, with regard to dress code, giving of an appropriate declaration or compliance with other directions, permitting every visitor irrespective of his faith, to offer respects and to make offerings to the deity. viii) We have noted that Hinduism does not eliminate any other belief and is eternal faith and wisdom and inspiration of centuries, as noted in earlier judgments of this Court. ix) Difficulties faced by the visitors, deficiencies in management, maintenance of hygiene, appropriate utilization 3 of offerings and protections of assets with regard to shrines, irrespective of religion is a matter for consideration not only for the State Government, Central Government but also for Courts. Every District Judge throughout India may examine such matters himself or through any court under his jurisdiction and send a report to the concerned High Court so that such report can be treated as PIL on the judicial side and such direction may be issued as may be considered necessary having regard to individual fact situation. x) Learned amicus is at liberty to engage with all stakeholders and to give suggestions for bringing about improvements and also to give a report to this Court. However, this will not stand in the way of the Committee of the State Government, Committee of the Central Government or any District Judge considering matters in terms of above directions.º 3. This Court vide order dated 9.1.2019, has appointed Shri Ranjit Kumar, learned Senior Counsel as Amicus Curiae and Ms. Priya Hingorani, learned Senior Counsel was requested to assist him in the matter. Learned Amicus Curiae has submitted interim reports pursuant to the orders which have been passed by this Court from time to time. During the pendency of the writ petition, the State Government has decided to make certain land acquisitions so as to provide various facilities to the pilgrims such as building of watch tower, an evacuation plan, widening of roads, etc. A Cabinet of the State Government of Orissa has taken a decision, which has been gazetted on 27.8.2019. Thereafter, as the instructions had been issued by the State Government, there was some unrest for the time being which has been settled. We had requested the Amicus Curiae to make a site visit and submit a report. They have submitted their report. 4 4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have considered various reports. We are happy to place it on record that the learned Counsel appearing at the Bar expressed satisfaction that the action is being taken by the State Government as per the Resolution dated 27.8.2019. IN RE: REPORT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, PURI 5. The District Judge, Puri has submitted the report along with various documents pursuant to order dated 8.6.2018. Following Annexures have been filed: ªANNEXURES A-I Sketch Map of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri. A-II Sketch Map of different locations in Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri. A-III Sketch Map of Shri Jagannath Temple with indication of five rows of queue of Darshan of the Jews in Shri Jagannath Temple. B. Proposed and Existing C.C.T.V. Cameras. C. List of cases against Sevaks. D. Statement of Sanctioned Post, present strength and vacancy position in Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri as on March 2018. E. Fund Management of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri. F. Audit Report of the Accountant General, Odisha of the accounts of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri for period April 2009 to September, 2015. G. Relevant Extracts of the Record-of-Rights prepared under the Puri Shri Jagannath Temple (Administration) Act, 1952 Part-I and Part-II. H. List of Sevaks and Palia Awards. J. Number of Hundi installed in Shri Jagannath Temple premises, Puri. K. Relevant extracts of report of Shri Jagannath Temple Administration Improvement Committee. L. Relevant extracts of report of the Commission of Inquiry 5 by Justice B.K. Patra, Former Judge, Orissa High Court. M. Recommendations of the Hon'ble Shri Justice P.K. Mohanty, Commission of Inquiry. N. Recommendations in the interim report dated 20-04- 2017 of the Commission of Inquiry into the affairs of the Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri. P. The Puri Shri Jagannath Temple (Administration) Act, 1952. Q. Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1954.º 6. The audit report of the Accountant General, Odisha has also been filed as Annexure-F on following various aspects: 1. Fund Management; 2. Estate Management; 3. Project Management; 4. Financial Management; 5. Utilisation of Grants-in-Aid; 6. Unrealistic Budget; 7. Submission of Inflated Utilization Certificate (UC) in excess of actual expenditure; 8. Contract Management; 9. Human Resource Management; 10. Miscellaneous observations as to jewellery and ornament, non-maintenance of Asset register, non-maintenance of subsidiary Registers, non-preparation of Report on administration of the affairs of Shri Jagannath Temple etc.; and 6 11. Limitation to Audit 7. Annexure-K is the report of the Committee headed by Shri B.D. Sharma, Ex-Governor for the State of Orissa for improvement of the temple in which certain recommendations have been made including accommodation and other facilities to the pilgrims. It was recommended that accommodation for 60,000 pilgrims should be provided by the Temple Administration. To start with, accommodation for 10,000 pilgrims should be provided as early as possible. With respect to the management of the existing properties and augmentation of income of the Temple, certain recommendations were made in Chapter III. Recommendations have also been made with respect to Sevapuja, Nitis, appointment of Sevaks and their conditions of service and subsidiary shrines. In Part III, recommendations were made as to accommodation and other facilities to the pilgrims and devotees. It was recommended that accommodation for 60,000 pilgrims should be provided by the Temple Administration and to start with, accommodation for 10,000 pilgrims, should be provided as early as possible. With respect to import of the record of rights and daily nitis, recommendations were made in Chapters XXIII and XXIV respectively. Main cause for delay in performance of Nitis and the remedy therefor had been dealt with in 7 Chapter XXV. Certain irregularities in the preparation of Kotha Bhog were dealt with in Chapter XXVI. In Chapter XXVII, it was recommended that Temple should take possession of Rosaghar Ovens. Certain nature of disputes, which hold back Nitis were mentioned in Chapter XXVIII. Economic condition of servitors and their numbers to be reduced were mentioned in Chapter XXIX. The aspect with respect to reforms in the system of puja and performance of nitis, was dealt with in Chapter XXXI of the report. With respect to the constitution of Managing Committee, certain recommendations were made in Chapter XXXII. Appointment of Administrator was dealt with in Chapter XXXIII. Sarbasadharan Darsan and the queue system were dealt with in Chapter XXXV. Paramanik Darsan and special sevas were dealt with in Chapter XXXVII. Suggestions for augmenting the income of the Temple was dealt with in Chapter XXXVIII. In the report, reference was also made to transport, dairy farm, lease of other rights and properties, land and buildings of Lord Jagannath situated outside the district of Puri and outside the State of Orissa.