A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Harlem Parole Reentry Court

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Harlem Parole Reentry Court

Research. Development. Justice. Reform. 520 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10018 P. 646.386.3100 F. 212.397.0985 courtinnovation.org Coming Home to Harlem: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Harlem Parole Reentry Court The Harlem Parole Reentry Court engages parolees returning to Harlem for six to nine months in supportive services, including evidence-based treatment such as cognitive behavioral therapy and judicial monitoring to promote compliance. Coming Home to Harlem presents the results of a randomized control trial of the reentry court. A total of 504 parolees returning to Harlem were randomly assigned to either the reentry court or regular parole between June 2010 and February 2013. The parolees were predominantly male, black, and/or Hispanic, averaged around 30 years of age, and shared similar case characteristics and criminal histories. Findings include: Monitoring and Rewards Impact on Parolees’ Lives Supervision: Reentry court parolees report to parole Employment: One year after release, 75 percent of officers and case managers in their community, reentry court parolees were in school or employed, increasing opportunities to connect with family compared to 45 percent in the comparison group. and local social service providers. They reported Reentry court participants also had higher annual to their parole officers and case managers more incomes and jobs that provided health insurance frequently than regular parolees. and paid vacation or sick time. Incentives: Ninety-six percent of reentry court Drug Use: At one year after release, 65 percent of parolees received an incentive in their first year, as reentry court parolees were not using drugs at opposed to 77 percent of those on regular parole. all, as opposed to only 39 percent of those on regular parole. Sanctions: Reentry court parolees were less likely to receive a sanction than those on regular parole (30 Criminal Thinking: Reentry court participants percent v. 63 percent.) were less likely to express feelings of entitlement, the need for power and control, and personal Procedural Justice irresponsibility. Perceived Fairness: Reentry court parolees reported better experiences than those on regular parole. Impact on Recidivism Ninety-six percent said that they were treated Revocation: The reentry court produced a 45 with respect, compared to 40 percent of regular percent relative reduction in parole revocations parolees. Only 8 percent of reentry court parolees when compared to the control group (12 percent v. stated that they were treated unfairly in court, 22 percent.) as opposed to 60 percent of regular parolees. Center for Court Innovation | Page 2 Re-arrest: Fifty-one percent of reentry court Office of Criminal Justice, the Center for parolees and 56 percent of control group parolees Court Innovation, and an array of local service were re-arrested within 18 months of release. providers. This study was underwritten by the U.S. Department of Justice (grant #2009-CZ-BX-0051 Reconviction: Reentry court parolees were 22 and grant #2013-CZ-BX-0033) and the J.C. Flowers percent less likely than regular parolees to be Foundation. reconvicted within 18 months, with a 60 percent reduction in felony reconvictions. For More Information Download a copy of the report: The Harlem Parole Reentry Court serves http://bit.ly/HarlemReport approximately 200 parolees each year. The program is operated as a partnership involving Listen to an interview with the report’s author: the New York State Department of Corrections and http://bit.ly/HarlemPodcast Community Supervision, New York City Mayor’s.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us