McClintock Drive Street Configuration Survey Results Overview Public meetings were held on March 25 and March 28, 2017, with the same material presented at both meetings, to get feedback on proposed design concepts for reconfiguring the current street design of McClintock Drive. Surveys were available at the meetings and online from March 25 – April 5, 2017. Five hundred and sixty-five (565) unduplicated survey responses were received. Responses 1) Do you live within a quarter mile of McClintock Drive? 28% Yes (392) No (154) 72% Total responses: 546 1 The scenario below includes three travel lanes southbound, two travel lanes northbound, standard bike lanes northbound and southbound and is the least expensive option with the least impact to neighbors and the right-of-way landscaping. Section Alternative Cost # of feet # of trees # of light curb impacted poles moves Apache to 2 $338,000 0 0 0 Broadway Broadway to 1 $2.2 million 4 111 22 Southern Southern to 1 $529,000 0 0 0 Baseline Baseline to 1 $2 million 4 73 30 Guadalupe Guadalupe to 3 $0* 0 0 0 Elliot TOTAL n/a $5.07 million 0 0 0 *Funded as part of a future paving project including striping. 2) Do you support the scenario above? All respondents who answered the question: 509 22% Yes (111) No (398) 78% Respondents who replied they live within ¼ mile of McClintock: 392 7% 20% Yes (77) No (286) No answer (29) 73% 2 3) If you answered no in question 2, why not? *respondents answered yes in question 2, but also selected an answer for question 3 *respondents answered no in question 2, but did not select an answer for question 3 All respondents who answered the question: 524 I support the sample scenario provided (95) 18% I support a different scenario as indicated (82) 16% 51% I support the current configuration that exists today (81) 15% I support returning the roadway to the 2015 configuration - no bike lanes (266) Respondents who replied they live within ¼ mile of McClintock: 355 I support the sample scenario provided 22% (77) I support a different scenario as indicated (48) 53% 13% I support the current configuration that exists today (43) 12% I support returning the roadway to the 2015 configuration - no bike lanes (187) Respondents had the opportunity to create their own scenario based on their answer to question 3. *77 people filled in the blank table (responses follow) *13 people who didn’t answer that they supported a different scenario in question 3 chose to submit a different scenario * 18 people who selected that they supported a different scenario as indicated in question 3 chose not to create their own scenario 3 Top alternative chose for each segment: Apache to Broadway to Southern to Baseline to Guadalupe to Broadway Southern Baseline Guadalupe Elliot Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Individual scenarios submitted: Apache to Broadway to Southern to Baseline to Guadalupe to Broadway Southern Baseline Guadalupe Elliot 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 4 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 5 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 6 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 7 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 8 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 3 Alternative 3 traffic lanes each traffic lanes each 9 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 way/std bike way/std bike Alternative 3 10 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 11 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 12 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 or 13 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 2 Alternative Del Rio to Baseline 14 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Opt. 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 15 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 16 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 17 Alternative 2 or 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 (if plan is for 3SB Keep as exists, lanes add separated 18 Univ2Apache) Keep as exists Alternative 2 Keep as exists bike lanes 19 Alternative 1 or 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 20 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 or 21 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 22 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 23 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 24 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 25 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 26 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 27 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 28 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 None of the 29 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 current Alternative 2 Alternative 2 4 Apache to Broadway to Southern to Baseline to Guadalupe to Broadway Southern Baseline Guadalupe Elliot 30 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 31 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 32 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 33 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 34 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 35 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 and 36 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 5 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 37 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 38 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 39 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 40 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 41 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 42 Alternative 3 43 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 44 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 45 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 46 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 47 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 48 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 49 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 or 50 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 4 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 51 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 52 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 53 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 54 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 (Del Rio) Alternative 2 Alternative 2 55 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 56 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 57 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 58 Alternative 3 As above As above As above As above 59 Alternative 3 60 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 61 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 62 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 63 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 5 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 64 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 65 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 5 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 66 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 5 Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 3 is preferred but Alt Alternative Alt 1 Alternative 1 or 67 1 ok Alternative Alt 1 or 2 2 68 No change No change No change No change 5 Apache to Broadway to Southern to Baseline to Guadalupe to Broadway Southern Baseline Guadalupe Elliot Just restripe Just restripe Just restripe Just restripe 69 lanes lanes lanes lanes Alternative 1 or 70 No change No change 2 No change No change 71 Not sure Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 1 Alternative 4 or 72 5 73 Alternative 5 Enhance this Enhance this 74 area area Alternative Vehicle option 2, 75 alt. 3 76 Alternative 1 or 3 Ride in the right Ride in the right side pay side n pay 77 Take Alameda Take Alameda Take Alameda attention attention 4) Please provide any other comments you may have about the project. Comments from those who responded “I support a different scenario”: 1. This is my first meeting and I would like to see if there is any plan on developing bike lanes north of Apache. Living in South Scottsdale, I often commute via McClintock and find myself feeling the need to use the sidewalk in some areas due to safety. Just like near the US60, the Loop 202 also becomes jammed up. 2. As a homeowner that purchased my home 2 yrs. ago, specifically because of the increasing bike community and dedicated bike lanes, and an avid cyclist, I am for the most clearly separated/protected bike lane options for safety of myself, my friends who cycle in the community and my growing family. I do understand the costs are significant, but the bike community is growing. Dedicated lane w/ green paint to more striping every few feet + at every intersections side rode entrance. **Possible cost effective happy medium for now, if no good solution for more buffer. Data that would be helpful: # of bike related accidents on streets with dedicated green striping before and after striping. The 2015 configuration was unsafe, laughable to spend money to establish bike lanes, consistent with changing society, only to spend money to return to ground zero and in future years spend more to establish bike-friendly lanes.