Finno-Ugric Languages in Time and Space Tartu, Estonia, February 1-3, 2015

Finno-Ugric Languages in Time and Space Tartu, Estonia, February 1-3, 2015

Ariste Conference Finno-Ugric Languages in Time and Space Tartu, Estonia, February 1-3, 2015 On the Morphological Alignment of Erzya and Moksha Verbal Paradigms Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Finno-Ugric Languages in Time and Space => • Финнэнь-угрань кельтне: • Шкастонзо • Тарказост аравтозь => • Finno-Ugric Languages • In time • In their place Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Not “Why” but “What for” • Open morphological analyzers • Giellatekno.uit.no • Robust • Requires more analyses to disambiguate itself • Open syntactical disambiguation • Constraint Grammar course in the works for Autumn 2015 • Open text to speech, Open translation Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki • Language affinity statistics • Morphology and Function • Moods and tenses • First Preterit • Non-ambiguous forms Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Statistics we have seen or heard on Erzya and Moksha language affinity • Vocabulary statistics for Erzya and Moksha: • 80% affinity (Keresztes 2011: 118). • Actual figure 80.80% (Zaicz 1990: 7-13). • 116 words: 92.42% • 902 Erzya words: 685 Moksha cognates • 75.94% • 1039 Moksha words: 890 Erzya cognates • 85.66% Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Statistics few have counted on Mordvin affinity • Paasonen’s “Mordwinisches Wörterbuch” 1990-1996, 2703 pages • 6952 root entries containing cognate information • Erzya 5302 = 76% • Moksha 4808 = 69% • Intersection 3158 = 45% • Stem entries: 21,754 • Erzya 14,524 = 67% • Moksha 12,945 = 59% • Intersection 5,785 = 27% Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Mutual Mordvin verb inventory based on Paasonen’s dictionary (1990-1996) Macro root articles (6,952) Erzya Moksha Intersection Union 1210 1198 734 1674 72.2% 71.5% 44% 100% Stem articles (21,754) Erzya Moksha Intersection Union 5,127 5,371 2,183 8,315 61.6% 64.6% 26% 100% Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Moods and tenses • Indicative • Non-past (21|22), First Preterit (18|19), Second Preterit (18|19) • (Prt2 and Conjunctional are not distinguished in Moksha) • Conjunctional (18|19) • Desiderative (18|19) • Imperative: Second person subjects only (7|6) • Optative: (20?|6) • Derivations: Conditional, Causative, Refl- Feb. 3,Telic… 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Ind.Prt1 in Erzya (18 forms) кундынь Sg1; Sg1/Pl3 кундык Sg2/Sg3; Imp Sg2/Sg3 кундыть Sg2; Sg2/Pl3; (Imp Sg2/Pl3) кундымим Sg3/Sg1 кундась Sg3 кундынзеть Sg3/Sg2 кундынек Pl1; Pl1/Sg3; Pl1/Pl3 кундызе Sg3/Sg3 кундыде Pl2 кундынзе Sg3/Pl3 кундасть Pl3 кундынк Pl2/Sg3; Pl2/Pl3; (Imp =) кундытинь Sg1/Sg2 кундызь Pl3/Sg3; Pl3/Pl3 кундыя Sg1/Sg3 кундымизь Pl3/Sg1; Pl3/Pl1; Sg3/Pl1; Pl2/Sg1; Pl2/Pl1; Sg2/Pl1 кундымик Sg2/Sg1 кундыдизь Pl3/Sg2; Pl3/Pl2; Sg3/Pl2; Pl1/Pl2; Pl1/Sg2; Sg1/Pl2 Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Non-ambiguity in Erzya Indicative First Preterit = 10/34 1 4 2 5 3 6 0 1 + - + - - Sg1/Sg2; Sg1/Sg3 4 - - - - - 2 + - - - - Sg2/Sg1 5 - - - - + Pl2 3 + - + - + + + Sg3/Sg1; Sg3/Sg2; Sg3/Sg3; Sg3/Pl3; Sg3 6 - - - - - - + Pl3 Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Ind.Prt1 in Moksha (19 forms) кундань Sg1 кундамань Sg3/Sg1 кундать Sg2 кунданзе Sg3/Sg2 кундась Sg3 кундазе Sg3/Sg3 кундаме Pl1 кундызень Sg3/Pl3 кундаде Pl2 кундаськ Pl1/Sg3; Pl1/Pl3 кундасть Pl3; Pl2/Sg3; Pl2/Pl3 кундазь Pl3/Sg3; Pl3/Pl3 кундайтень Sg1/Sg2 кундамасть Pl2/Sg1; Pl2/Pl1; Sg2/Pl1 кундайне Sg1/Sg3; Sg1/Pl3 кундамазь Pl3/Sg1; Pl3/Pl1; Sg3/Pl1 кундамайть Sg2/Sg1 кундадязь Pl3/Sg2; Pl3/Pl2; Sg3/Pl2; Pl1/Pl2; Pl1/Sg2; Sg1/Pl2 кундайть Sg2/Sg3; Sg2/Pl3 Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Non-ambiguity in Moksha Indicative First Preterit = 11/34 1 4 2 5 3 6 0 1 + - - - + Sg1/Sg2; Sg1 4 - - - - + Pl1 2 + - - - + Sg2/Sg1; Sg2 5 - - - - + Pl2 3 + - + - + + + Sg3/Sg1; Sg3/Sg2; Sg3/Sg3; Sg3/Pl3; Sg3 6 - - - - - - - Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Non-ambiguity Ind. Prt1 Erzya = v ; Moksha = ✪ 1 4 2 5 3 6 0 1 v v ✪ Sg1/Sg2 ✪ 4 ✪ 2 v ✪ Sg2/Sg1 ✪ 5 v Pl2 ✪ 3 v v v v v Sg3/Sg1; Sg3/Sg2; Sg3/Sg3; Sg3/Pl3; Sg3 ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ ✪ 6 v Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki 8 non-ambiguous cells Erzya Moksha Intersection Union 10 11 8 13 76% 84% 61.5% 100% Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Non-ambiguous object conjugation forms Erzya Oral Erzya Lit. Moksha Lit Sg2/Sg1 180 10 197 Sg3/Sg1 118 13 138 Sg1/Sg2 189 13 169 Sg3/Sg2 254 3 89 Sg3/Sg3 1940 275 2877 Sg3/Pl3 625 107 826 Pl2 ? ? ? Sg3 ? ? ? 55% 15.5% 59.7% (cf. Trosterud 2006: 291, 294) Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Only 2 identically ambiguous Erzya Moksha Pl3/Sg3; Pl3/Pl3 Pl3/Sg3; Pl3/Pl3 = Pl3/Pl2, Pl3/Sg2; Pl1/Pl2, Pl3/Pl2, Pl3/Sg2; Pl1/Pl2, = Pl1/Sg2; Sg3/Pl2; Sg1/Pl2 Pl1/Sg2; Sg3/Pl2; Sg1/Pl2 Pl2/Pl1, Pl2/Sg1; Sg2/Pl1; Pl2/Pl1, Pl2/Sg1; Sg2/Pl1 Moksha distinguishes Pl3/Pl1, Pl3/Sg1; Sg3/Pl1 Pl3/Pl1, Pl3/Sg1; Sg3/Pl1 subject person (also IMP) Pl1, Pl1/Pl3, Pl1/Sg3 Pl1/Pl3, Pl1/Sg3 Moksha 1 less ambiguous Sg2/Sg3; Imp Sg2/Sg3 Sg2/Sg3, Sg2/Pl3 Moksha lacks distinct Sg3 object Sg2, Sg2/Pl3 Erzya lacks distinct Sg1, Sg2 Sg1, Sg1/Pl3 Sg1/Sg3, Sg1/Pl3 Moksha lacks distinct Sg3 object Pl3; Pl2/Pl3, Pl2/Sg3 Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Requirements for machine translation • Non-ambiguous forms Ind.Prt1: • 6 object conjugation functions/forms (over 55%) • 2 subject conjugation functions/forms • Equally ambiguous forms: • 8 object conjugation functions/2 object conjugation forms Disambiguation 34 – 16 = 18 Syntax required: Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Aitäh! Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki Keresztes, László 2011: Bevezetés a mordvin nyelvészetbe. Debreceni egyetemi kiadó. Trosterud, Trond 2006: Homonymy in the Uralic Two-Argument Agreement Paradigms. SUST 151. Zaicz, Gábor 1990: Beitrag zur Typologie und Statistik des Erza- und Mokscha-mordwinischen (eine vergleichende Untersuchung). In Congressus septimus internationalis fenno-ugristarum. Debrecen 27. VIII. – 2. 1I. 1990, 3C. Sessiones sectionum, dissertationes linguistica. Redigunt László Jakab, László Keresztes, Antal Kiss, Sándor Maticsák, S. 7-13. Debrecen. Open Corpora: http://gtweb.uit.no/u_korp Open Technology: Giellatekno (Tromsø) http://giellatekno.uit.no Generous Funding: Kone Säätiö (Helsinki) http://www.konesaatio.fi Feb. 3, 2015 Jack Rueter, PhD. University of Helsinki .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    19 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us