N200327s0160

N200327s0160

Clinical Review Sheral S. Patel, M.D. NDA 200327 SD478 S-16 and S-17 Ceftaroline fosamil (Teflaro®) CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type Pediatric Efficacy Supplements Application Number(s) NDA 200327 SD478 S-16 and S-17 Priority or Standard Priority Submit Date 7 December 2015 Received Date 7 December 2015 PDUFA Goal Date 7 June 2016 Division/Office Division of Anti-Infective Products/ OAP/ OND/ CDER Reviewer Name Sheral S. Patel, M.D. Team Leader Hala Shamsuddin, M.D. Review Completion Date 13 May 2016 Established Name Ceftaroline fosamil (Proposed) Trade Name Teflaro® Applicant Cerexa, Inc. (A Subsidiary of Forest Laboratories, LLC.) Formulation(s) Powder for Injection Dosing Regimen 1. Children aged 2 months to < 2 years: 8 mg/kg every 8 hours IV administered over 5 to 60 minutes 2. Children and adolescents aged 2 years to ≤ 18 years: 12 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 400 mg for pediatric patients weighing > 33 kg) q8h by IV infusion administered over 5 to 60 minutes Applicant Proposed For the pediatric population 2 months to < 18 years Indication(s)/Population(s) 1. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections 2. Community acquired bacterial pneumonia Recommendation on Approval Regulatory Action Recommended For the pediatric population 2 months to < 18 years Indication(s)/Population(s) 1. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (if applicable) 2. Community acquired bacterial pneumonia CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition 1 Reference ID: 3933750 Clinical Review Sheral S. Patel, M.D. NDA 200327 SD478 S-16 and S-17 Ceftaroline fosamil (Teflaro®) Table of Contents Glossary ......................................................................................................................................... 10 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Product Introduction ...................................................................................................... 12 1.2. Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness ............................................ 13 1.3. Benefit-Risk Assessment ................................................................................................ 13 2 Therapeutic Context .............................................................................................................. 18 2.1. Analysis of Condition ...................................................................................................... 18 2.2. Analysis of Current Treatment Options ......................................................................... 19 3 Regulatory Background ......................................................................................................... 20 3.1. U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ............................................................. 20 3.2. Summary of Presubmission/Submission Regulatory Activity ........................................ 21 3.3. Foreign Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ....................................................... 23 4 Significant Issues from Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical Conclusions on Efficacy and Safety................................................................................................................. 23 4.1. Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) .......................................................................... 23 4.2. Product Quality .............................................................................................................. 23 4.3. Clinical Microbiology ...................................................................................................... 24 4.4. Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ........................................................................... 24 4.5. Clinical Pharmacology .................................................................................................... 25 4.5.1. Mechanism of Action .............................................................................................. 25 4.5.2. Pharmacodynamics ................................................................................................. 25 4.5.3. Pharmacokinetics .................................................................................................... 26 5 Sources of Clinical Data and Review Strategy ....................................................................... 27 5.1. Table of Clinical Studies .................................................................................................. 27 5.2. Review Strategy .............................................................................................................. 35 6 Review of Relevant Individual Trials Used to Support Efficacy ............................................. 35 6.1. Study P903-23: A Multicenter, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Ceftaroline CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition 2 Reference ID: 3933750 Clinical Review Sheral S. Patel, M.D. NDA 200327 SD478 S-16 and S-17 Ceftaroline fosamil (Teflaro®) Versus Comparator in Pediatric Subjects With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (D3720C00004) ........................................................................................................ 35 6.1.1. Study Design............................................................................................................ 35 6.1.2. Study Results ........................................................................................................... 40 6.2. Study P903-31: A Multicenter, Randomized, Observer Blinded, Active-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone in Pediatric Subjects With Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization (DC3720C00007) .............................................................................................. 44 6.2.1. Study Design............................................................................................................ 44 6.2.2. Study Results ........................................................................................................... 49 6.3. Study P903-24: A Multicenter, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Active-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin in Pediatric Subjects with Complicated Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia ................................................................................................................. 49 6.3.1. Study Design............................................................................................................ 49 6.3.2. Study Results ........................................................................................................... 53 7 Integrated Review of Effectiveness ....................................................................................... 58 7.1. Assessment of Efficacy Across Trials .............................................................................. 58 7.1.1. Primary Endpoints ................................................................................................... 58 7.1.2. Secondary and Other Endpoints ............................................................................. 59 7.1.3. Subpopulations ....................................................................................................... 59 7.1.4. Dose and Dose-Response........................................................................................ 59 7.1.5. Onset, Duration, and Durability of Efficacy Effects ................................................ 59 7.2. Additional Efficacy Considerations ................................................................................. 59 7.3. Integrated Assessment of Effectiveness ........................................................................ 60 8 Review of Safety .................................................................................................................... 63 8.1. Safety Review Approach ................................................................................................ 63 8.2. Review of the Safety Database ...................................................................................... 64 8.2.1. Overall Exposure ..................................................................................................... 64 8.2.2. Baseline demographic and other characteristics ................................................... 66 8.2.3. Adequacy of the safety database: .......................................................................... 71 8.3. Adequacy of Applicant’s Clinical Safety Assessments .................................................... 71 CDER Clinical Review Template 2015 Edition 3 Reference ID: 3933750 Clinical Review Sheral S. Patel, M.D. NDA 200327 SD478 S-16 and S-17 Ceftaroline fosamil (Teflaro®) 8.3.1. Issues Regarding Data Integrity and Submission Quality ....................................... 71 8.3.2. Categorization of Adverse Events ........................................................................... 71 8.3.3. Routine Clinical Tests .............................................................................................. 72 8.3.4. Deaths ....................................................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    162 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us