Do Differences in Mating Behaviour Lead to Differences in Connectivity

Do Differences in Mating Behaviour Lead to Differences in Connectivity

Marine Environmental Research 151 (2019) 104760 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Environmental Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marenvrev Do differences in mating behaviour lead to differences in connectivity patterns of reef fishes? Insights from two sympatric surgeonfish species in T the Indian Ocean Levy Michael Otwomaa,b,c,*, Hauke Reutera,b a Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany b Faculty Biology and Chemistry, University of Bremen, Germany c Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI), Mombasa, Kenya ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Disentangling the contribution of biotic and abiotic factors in the structuring of the genetic diversity of reef Mating behaviour species is critical to illuminate the diversification of evolutionary lineages in marine environment. Howevr, Habitat preference previous studies have mainly focused on determining the influence of pelagic larval duration on the connectivity Genetic diversity and demographic history of reef fishes, whereas few studies have examined the effects of other biotic factors, Demographic expansion such as mating behaviour and habitat preference. Here, we use mitochondrial DNA (ATPase 6/8) and ten mi- Acanthurus triostegus crosatellite loci to compare the population genetic structure and demographic history of the spawning ag- Acanthurus leucosternon gregating Acanthurus triostegus with the monogamous spawning Acanthurus leucosternon. Pairwise comparisons and discriminant analysis of principal components showed that the genetic structuring patterns of the two species are not consistent with the influence of mating behaviour, suggesting the possible role of other biotic and abiotic factors. However, demographic history estimates revealed that these species may have responded dif- ferently to sea level fluctuations during the glacial maxima. 1. Introduction overestimated (Barber et al., 2002; Weersing and Toonen, 2009; Selkoe and Toonen, 2011; Riginos et al., 2013). Furthermore, other features Understanding dispersal in the marine environment is essential such as past biogeographic events (Barber et al., 2002; Otwoma and because it has a profound influence on species evolution and persis- Kochzius, 2016), ocean currents, larval swimming ability (DiBattista tence (Mora and Sale, 2002). For most shallow water marine species et al., 2017), differences in habitat (Rocha et al., 2002), distance with a bipartite life cycle, dispersal through the pelagic larval stage (Otwoma et al., 2018a), mating behaviour (Jackson et al., 2014), and represents the only mechanism of linking populations between distant local adaptation (Imron et al., 2007) have been found to profoundly sites. However, tracking dispersal in the marine environment remains a affect the genetic population structure of marine species. major challenge, because marine larvae are minute and suffer high rates Comparative phylogeography offers invaluable insights into the of mortality (Sale et al., 2005). Consequently, the application of genetic factors that drive spatial genetic structuring in sympatric taxa markers to infer dispersal in marine organisms is increasingly a (Papadopoulou and Knowles, 2016). This approach uses the con- common practice (Hellberg et al., 2002; Jones et al., 2009). Because cordance-discordance criterion to determine whether the genetic larvae of most marine species spend times ranging from days to months structure of sympatric species is impacted by abiotic or biotic factors in the pelagic marine environment (Sale et al., 2005; Almany et al., (Papadopoulou and Knowles, 2016). The assumption of most com- 2007), it has long been thought that species with a long pelagic larval parative phylogeographic studies is that taxa evolving in a certain en- duration (PLD) will have a high dispersal and weak genetic structure. vironment should respond the same way to extrinsic and intrinsic fac- Indeed, previous studies have shown a correlation between PLD and tors that cause genetic divergence. Nevertheless, co-occurring taxa gene flow (Dawson et al., 2002; Faurby and Barber, 2012; Riginos et al., often show discordant phylogeographic structure, suggesting that every 2014). However, there is a growing number of studies which demon- species respond uniquely to environmental changes (Crandall et al., strate that the influence of PLD on dispersal distance is often 2008; DiBattista et al., 2012; Weber et al., 2015; Puritz et al., 2017). * Corresponding author. Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany. E-mail address: [email protected] (L.M. Otwoma). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2019.104760 Received 30 January 2019; Received in revised form 5 July 2019; Accepted 12 July 2019 Available online 12 July 2019 0141-1136/ © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. L.M. Otwoma and H. Reuter Marine Environmental Research 151 (2019) 104760 According to Papadopoulou and Knowles (2016), taxon-specific traits limit dispersal; species forming spawning aggregations would be ex- need to be incorporated into comparative phylogeography studies, so as pected to have lower connectivity patterns than monogamous pairing to provide a better understanding of the mode and rate of phylogeo- spawners (Portnoy et al., 2013; Jackson et al., 2014). graphic diversification. For example, Puritz et al. (2017) compared the Sea level fluctuations during the Pleistocene are suspected to have population genetics of the planktonic-developing seastar Meridiastra primarily influenced the demographic histories of marine taxa, in- calcar and benthic-developing dwarf cushion seastar Parvulastra exigua cluding crabs (He et al., 2010), gastropods (Crandall et al., 2008), in the temperate waters of Australia and linked their divergent re- corals (Woodroffe et al., 2010), and fish (Craig et al., 2010; Ludt et al., sponses to Pleistocene glacial cycles to species-specific traits. Similarly, 2012). However, species with narrow niches (habitat specialists) such Weber et al. (2015) found that the brooding lineages of the brittle star as A. leucosternon may have been more sensitive and likely to experi- Ophioderma longicauda display a greater genetic structure than the ence population declines than their congeners with high ecological broadcast spawner lineage. These studies confirm that integrating plasticity (habitat generalists) such as A. triostegus, when sea level species-specific traits into comparative phylogeographic tests can help dropped during the glacial maxima (Crandall et al., 2008; Craig et al., in understanding the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on the ge- 2010; Ludt et al., 2012). This is because habitat generalists with broad netic structuring of marine species (Papadopoulou and Knowles, 2016). niches have usually better chances to survive in adverse conditions than Among biotic factors that are predicted to affect the genetic struc- habitat specialists. turing of marine species, significant progress has been made in our In this study, we compared the population genetic structure of A. ability to understand the relationship between PLD and realized dis- leucosternon and A. triostegus, to determine whether reproductive persal distance of marine taxa (Weersing and Toonen, 2009). However, mating behaviour has an effect on the genetic structuring of these reef relatively few empirical studies have investigated the relationship be- fishes. Given that PLD estimates among Acanthurus species are not re- tween gene structuring and other biotic factors, such as mating beha- markably different (maximum = 70 days: Thresher, 1984; McCormick, viour (monogamous pairing vs. spawning aggregation) and habitat 1999; Rocha et al., 2002), we expected greater genetic structuring preferences (generalists vs. specialists). Although there is still no clear among populations of A. triostegus than A. leucosternon in the Indian consensus on whether mating behaviour and habitat preferences can Ocean, if spawning aggregation in the former does enhance larval re- affect the population genetics and demographic history of marine spe- tention. However, if the long PLD suffice to ensure large-scale dispersal, cies (Craig et al., 2010; Reece et al., 2011), it is likely that their in- then we predict similar geographic genetic homogeneity in the two fluence is governed by interactions with environmental factors such as, species whose adults differ in reproductive mating behaviour. In addi- ocean currents, large-scale climatic variations, and geological features. tion, we reconstructed the demographic history of A. triostegus and A. In other cases, the influence of these environmental factors may even leucosternon to determine whether habitat preferences played a role in override the influence of the two biotic factors on the genetic struc- shaping their present phylogeographic structure. If habitat preference turing of marine species (Ayre et al., 2009). did influence the species response to sea level fluctuations during the To further test whether mating behaviour and habitat preference Pleistocene, then these two species should exhibit different demo- can predict genetic structuring and demographic history of reef species, graphic history. respectively, we focus on two phylogenetically related surgeonfishes, the powder blue-tang Acanthurus leucosternon and convict surgeonfish 2. Materials and methods Acanthurus triostegus (Sorenson et al., 2013). These two species, like other Acanthurus species, are primarily herbivores, feeding on benthic 2.1. Sampling and DNA extraction algae that inhibit coral recruitment

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us