PROJECT TITLE: Oxygen Usage During Flotation – Nitrogen Vs

PROJECT TITLE: Oxygen Usage During Flotation – Nitrogen Vs

Washington State Wine Commission Demonstration Research Grant Program FINAL REPORT – SHORT TERM PROJECT 2020-21 FUNDING CYCLE Deadline for Submission: June 30, 2021 Submit reports to Washington State Wine Commission: [email protected] PROJECT TITLE: Oxygen Usage During Flotation – Nitrogen vs. Oxygen Project Duration: 1 year Principal Investigator: Tim Donahue Co-PI: Organization: Walla Walla College Organization: Telephone: Telephone: Email: [email protected] Email: Cooperators: 1. Summary: Flotation is a technique of using compressed gas combined with fining agents (bentonite, gelatin) to clarify white wine juice. The predominant reason for using flotation is to clarify juice quickly (2-3 hours vs. 1-2 days) and that the clarification is done at room temperature, which creates a large energy savings over the refrigeration used in cold settling. Post fermentation, wine was analyzed via- ETS Labs for: • Basic wine chemistry: pH, titratable acidity, volatile acidity, ethanol, free and total sulfur dioxide. • Wine phenolic chemistry: caffeic acid, caftaric acid, catechin, gallic acid, quercetin glycosides, tannin, astilbin, grape reaction product. quercetin aglycone. 2. Objectives and Experiments Conducted to Meet Stated Objectives: Floatation was done to observe modifications the phenolic makeup of a given white wine. Use of fining agents, along with an inert gas vs oxidative gas, can affect the phenolic makeup of the grape juice and subsequent wine. This investigated the way in which these different techniques can influence the makeup of grape juice and subsequent wine prior to fermentation. Procedures to Accomplish Objectives: Fruit was hand harvested from Sagemoor Vineyards in Pasco Washington. Juice was separated into 3 treatments: 1. Control: Riesling was cold settled using enzymes then racked for fermentation 2. Treatment 1: Floatation using nitrogen as the compressed gas then racked for fermentation. 3. Treatment 2 Flotation using oxygen as the compressed gas then racked for fermentation. Was accomplished with QA-23 yeast and nutrient supplemented with di-ammonium phosphate at a rate of 1/g/L to add 220mg/L of nitrogen to the fermentation. Brix and temperature were monitored daily. 3. Major Research Accomplishments and Results by Objective: It was noted that there were differences in wine chemistry and phenolic makeup between all treatments, additionally, there was a pronounced sensory difference between the wines. This trial gives a multifaceted set of data to winemakers who are considering using floatation as a tool to modify their wines, and/or energy and time savings associated. 4. Research Presentations: See attached. 5. Research Success Statements: Project demonstrated: • Flotation is a valuable tool for efficiency and time savings • Flotation combined with nitrogen or oxygen may be used to modify the phenolic makeup of a wine • Flotation combined with nitrogen or oxygen may be used to alter the sensory properties of the wine. 6. Funds Status: Include a general summary of how funds were spent. – See attached. Please submit the report to the Washington State Wine Commission’s Research Program Director, Melissa Hansen, at: [email protected] by June 30 of the end of the research funding year. Future research funding will be contingent on timely reporting. 1201 Western Avenue, Suite 450 Seattle, Washington 98101 206.326.5749 WashingtonWine.org Oxygen usage during Flotation Nitrogen vs Oxygen on 2020 Sagemoor Riesling Final Report for the Washington State Wine Commission Mini-Grant Program Flotation - Mechanics Pump Compressed gas Diffusion stone Expansion chamber Fining in the juice phase Must Foam/Froth Press juice Pectinase Gelatin Clarified Juice PVPP Carbon Bentonite Etc…. Pumped juice with compressed gas Visuals Press, 20, 40, 60, 90 minutes Nitrogen vs Oxygen 2020 Sagemoor Riesling Control Nitrogen Flotation Oxygen Flotation • Cinn-Free Enzyme @ • Cinn-Free Enzyme @ • Cinn-Free Enzyme 40ml/HL 40ml/HL @ 40ml/HL • Divergan F (PVPP) @ • Divergan F (PVPP) • Divergan F (PVPP) @ @ 10g/HL 10g/HL 10g/HL • GECOLL Supra @ • GECOLL Supra @ • GECOLL Supra @ 20ml/HL 20ml/HL 20ml/HL • Flotation for 90 • Flotation for 90 • Let settle minutes to 50 NTU minutes to 50 NTU with Oxygen with Nitrogen (inert) (Oxidizer) Wine Chem: Ethanol RIESLING ETHANOL Control Nitrogen FloAt Oxygen FloAt 14.13 14.06 13.06 CONCENTRATION (% BY VOL) (% BY CONCENTRATION ETHANOL Notes on Ethanol • Low SO2 usage led to a spontaneous MLF in the control treatment. • Given the low pH it did not cause a rise in volatile acidity, as glu/fru is converted to lactic acid <pH 3.6 Wine Chem - Acid RIESLING ACIDITY Control Nitrogen Float Oxygen Float 5.9 5.8 4.9 1.42 1.35 0 CONCENTRATION (G/L) CONCENTRATION L-MALIC ACID TITRATABLE ACIDITY Notes on Acidity • The control has significantly lower acidity due to the spontaneous ML fermentation • However not much of a difference between the O and N treatments. Wine Chem: Riesling pH RIESLING PH Control Nitrogen Float Oxygen Float 3.74 3.48 3.39 PH Notes on PH • The control is much higher, due to spontaneous MLF (Seeing a trend here?) • Why would the N be lower? QUERCETIN QUERCETIN AGLYCONE 0.4 Riesling Juice Phenolics 0.2 0 Control GLYCOSIDES QUERCETIN QUERCETIN 2.8 RIESLING PHENOLICS 2.3 Nitrogen Float 0.4 ASTILBIN 0.6 0.5 Float Oxygen 0.3 GALLIC ACID 1.4 1.4 0.8 Notes on phenolics • Both treatment wines were lower in phenolic material • The N treatment may be lower due to addition of fining agents & extra circulation? • The O treatment may lower due to fining agents as well as oxidation Riesling Wine Phenolics CHART TITLE tannin catechin 22.2 20.4 15.5 1.7 1.4 0 CONTROL NITROGEN FLOAT OXYGEN FLOAT Notes on overall tannin • The fining agents & extended circulation from flotation had an impact on reduction of tannin. • In this case, it appears that the oxygen treatment also caused some flocculation and precipitation of tannin. CAFTARIC ACID CAFTARIC 50.1 51.4 4.5 Control Nitrogen Float CHART TITLE CHART CAFFEIC ACID CAFFEIC 4.4 4.2 2.4 Oxygen Float Oxygen GRAPE REACTION PRODUCT GRAPE REACTION 2.7 2.7 0 Notes on Caftaric, Caffeic, and GRP • Caftaric acid degradation is a sign of oxidation, this certainly shows that. • Interesting note: there should be an increase in GRP due to oxidation. Did it just go so far that it precipitated? Interesting Student Sensory Notes Control Nitrogen Oxygen Honey Floral Honeysuckle Butter Banana Tropical Creamy Peach Lemon Oily Apple Citrus *Least Preferred *Most preferred for *Second most aromatics preferred for aromatics *Second for *Most preferred for “mouthfeel” “mouthfeel” Flotation conclusions • Flotation is very useful in reducing phenolic material up front. • Oxygen may be useful in conversion of certain phenolics and it definitely has an effect on mouthfeel and aroma. Good or bad? • Winemakers can use flotation combined with inert gas to modify the aromatic profile and mouthfeel of a wine. • Overall another tool to use to make great wine. .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    21 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us