1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 30327/2009(LB-RES) BETWEEN THE SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT MONITORNG COMMITTEE, GOVERNMENT KANNADA HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, KOODLI, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.G.B.CHANDRE GOWDA, ADV.) AND 1. JANAKIRAM K.S. S/O LATE SOMASUNDARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST. 2. PATTABHIRAM K.S. S/O LATE SOMASUNDARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST. 3. RAGHURAM K.S. S/O LATE SOMASUNDARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, 4. SEETHARAM K.S. S/O LATE SOMASUNDARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, 2 5. ANANTHARAM K.S. S/O LATE SOMASUNDARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, 6. PRASANNARAM K.S. S/O LATE SOMASUNDARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 7. SHASHIKALA K.S. S/O LATE SOMASUNDARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 8. DAYANANDA RAO K.S. S/O LATE SOMASUNDARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, K.E.B.EMPLOYEE, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF KOODLI VILLAGE, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. 9. KOODLI GRAM PANCHAYATH, KOODLI VILLAGE, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 10. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYATH, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. 11. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, SHIMOGA, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, 12. THE HEAD MASTER, GOVERNMENT KANNADA HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, KOODLI, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, …RESPONDENTS 3 (BY SRI.K.N.MAHABALESHWARA RAO, ADV. FOR R1,R2,R4 TO R8; SRI.B.J.ESHWARAPPA, ADV. FOR R9 TO R11; R12 – SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 7.3.2008 MARKE AS ANNEXURE-H ISSUED BY TE R10 AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL, UNJUST AND ARBITRARY AND CONTRARY TO LAW. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Even according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the term of office of the petitioner school development Monitoring committee has expired. If that is so, Writ Petition is not maintainable and is accordingly rejected. IAs. are unnecessary and accordingly it stands disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE PL.