Incipient Sexual Isolation in Laupala Cerasina: Females Discriminate Population-Level Divergence in Acoustic Characters

Incipient Sexual Isolation in Laupala Cerasina: Females Discriminate Population-Level Divergence in Acoustic Characters

Current Zoology 58 (3): 416−425, 2012 Incipient sexual isolation in Laupala cerasina: Females discriminate population-level divergence in acoustic characters Jaime L. GRACE1*, Kerry L. SHAW2 1 Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 2 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA, [email protected] Abstract Sexual selection by female choice can shape the evolution of male traits within populations, since the most attractive males experience an increase in fitness through elevated mating success. Speciation by sexual selection occurs when evolution in traits and preferences within populations causes differentiation among populations, such that females in alternative populations prefer sexual signals of their own population relative to others. Differentiated traits and preferences thereby play an active role in limiting gene flow between divergent populations. The effectiveness of differentiated preferences in maintaining differentiated male signals against the homogenizing effects of gene flow across populations will be limited by both the degree to which fe- males can discriminate against non-local males, and the breeding values of traits and preferences. Populations of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina have diverged in pulse rate, a sexually selected male signal, and female acoustic preference for pulse rate. Gene flow between neighboring populations may be reduced if migrants from sexually diverged populations experience re- duced mating success. We show that females discriminate among divergent songs characteristic of neighboring populations, that differences among populations in song and preference breed true in a common environment, and that mean preferences for each population closely match the mean pulse rates. Divergence in preference was observed only between populations that also dif- fered in song. Along with a striking ability to discriminate slight differences in song, correlated evolution of song and preference within populations could be a mechanism that promotes assortative mating among populations, thereby reducing gene flow, and leading to speciation in Laupala [Current Zoology 58 (3): 416−425, 2012]. Keywords Sexual selection, Phenotypic divergence, Behavioral isolation, Preference functions, Speciation More than a century ago, Darwin (1871) first ob- Griffith, 2009) as by-products may contribute, there are served that secondary sexual characters diverge rapidly several reasons to suspect that sexual selection actively among closely related species, suggesting that sexual facilitates speciation. First, reproductive isolation is selection is an important mechanism influencing evolu- more likely to result from a divergence in traits directly tion within species. Much more recently, divergent sex- involved in mate choice, such as sexually selected ual selection among populations has been proposed as a characters (Panhuis et al., 2001; West-Eberhard, 1983). mechanism that could drive speciation (Coyne and Orr, Second, in several taxonomic groups, behavioral (and 2004; Panhuis et al., 2001; Ritchie, 2007; West-Eber- especially sexual) isolation appears to evolve at a faster hard, 1983). Since sexual selection within species is rate than hybrid incompatibilities (Alexander and widely reported (Andersson, 1994), its action within Breden, 2004; Coyne and Orr, 1997; Mendelson, 2003). geographically isolated populations may lead to popula- Third, comparative studies using various proxies for the tion divergence across a broader geographic range intensity of sexual selection have indicated that phy- (Endler, 1992; Lande, 1982). Indeed, because isolated logenetic clades with higher levels of sexual selection populations experience no selection pressure to maintain (and sexual conflict) tend to be species-rich (Arnqvist et reproductive compatibility, their divergence is possibly al., 2000; Barraclough et al., 1995; Kraaijeveld et al., inevitable (Mayr, 1963; Turelli et al., 2001; West-Eber- 2011; Mitra et al., 1996). Lastly, the rapid evolution of hard, 1983). sexual signaling is a key feature associated with diversi- While divergence through natural selection (Schluter, fication in two systems demonstrating accelerated rates 2009; Schluter and Conte, 2009; van Doorn et al., 2009) of speciation (cichlids, Danley and Kocher, 2001; or the evolution of genetic incompatibilities (Pryke and crickets, Mendelson and Shaw, 2005). Received Nov. 3, 2011; accepted Jan. 7, 2012. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] . Current affiliation: Dept. of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Norbyvägen 18d, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden © 2012 Current Zoology GRACE JL, SHAW KL: Song discrimination in Hawaiian crickets 417 Demonstrating that sexual selection has contributed ing potential mates. Furthermore, the interspecific dif- to speciation requires detailed studies of specific popu- ferences in both pulse rate and preference have a genetic lations in the process of divergence. First, sexual selec- basis (Oh et al., in press; Shaw and Lesnick, 2009; tion within populations must occur or have occurred, Shaw et al., 2007; Wiley and Shaw, 2010). resulting in differentiation among populations in the Within the species Laupala cerasina, pulse rate has phenotypic targets of selection. Second, differentiation been shown to be a sexually selected trait that varies in these phenotypic targets must be substantial enough extensively among populations, with females exhibiting to actively discourage gene flow between populations. correspondingly variable preferences for pulse rates at For example, females must be capable of discriminating or near the male population mean (Grace and Shaw, between males from their own versus phenotypically 2011; Mendelson and Shaw, 2002; Shaw, 2000b; Shaw distinct neighboring populations. Under these circum- and Herlihy, 2000). In addition, evidence supports a stances, coevolution of signal and preference is ex- genetic basis to intraspecific variation in song and prefe- pected to bring about the assortative mating that can rence in L. cerasina (Grace and Shaw, 2011; Otte, 1994; close the reproductive boundary between incipient spe- Shaw, 1999). Because the within-species divergence in cies (Kirkpatrick, 1982; Lande, 1981). these sexual communication traits mirrors the diffe- Many species exhibit minor inter-populational dif- rences between species, albeit to a lesser degree, we ferences in male sexual signals (Andersson, 1994; hypothesized that L. cerasina acoustic variation reflects Gerhardt and Huber, 2002); however, geographic varia- incipient speciation by sexual selection. In the present tion in sexual signals may not always reflect a corre- study, we test whether females are capable of distin- lated divergence in female preference for those signals guishing among the slight differences in pulse rate that (Hill, 1994; van der Sluijs et al., 2010; Zuk et al., 2006). characterize geographically adjacent populations (~ 0.2 Several studies of various frog species have found that pulses per second, pps) across the range of L. cerasina divergence in male acoustic characters among popula- on Hawaii Island (known as the Big Island of Hawaii). tions may have been the result of divergent sexual se- If females are to influence the reproductive fate of mi- lection (Boul et al., 2007; Prohl et al., 2006); however, grant males from phenotypically distinct populations, these studies have not addressed differences in the shape they are expected to exhibit biased phonotactic re- of female preference functions in populations in the sponses to songs that differ by this order of magnitude. process of divergence. In contrast, many studies of di- Furthermore, when neighboring populations are com- vergent sexual selection in crickets do indicate divergent pared, females should express divergent preferences, preference functions (Gray and Cade, 2000; Shaw, thus favoring songs representative of homotypic over 2000b); however, these studies document differences at heterotypic males. Finally, if coordinated changes arise the interspecific level. In the cricket Teleogryllus oce- due to selection within populations, we expect to see anicus, populations vary in the shape of the female evidence of this in the form of genetic correlations be- preference function but these differences are not corre- tween song and preference within families. lated with male song, which is constrained by strong 1 Materials and Methods natural selection from predators (Simmons et al., 2001). Understanding the shape of female preference functions Laupala cerasina were collected from eight locations among populations in the early stages of divergence is on the Big Island of Hawaii in July 2005, hereafter re- critical, because this is the time when these initially ferred to as populations. The collecting sites cover the minor differences have the greatest potential to either majority of the range of L. cerasina, both geographi- accelerate or hinder the rate of population divergence by cally and phenotypically, and included the following impacting the degree of gene flow. paired comparisons: A) Muliwai Plateau (MP) vs. The Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala makes an ideal Waimea Reservoir (WM) (7.55 km apart), B) Kalopa candidate for studying questions of sexual selection and Park (KP) vs. Laupahoehoe (LP) (21.26 km apart), C) speciation. The 38 constituent species evolved recently Eucalyptus Toe (ET) vs. Kaiwiki (KW) (4.08 km apart), and are morphologically

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us